Aristotle and Aquinas on Cognition

References

• Herman Randall , John Jr. 1960 . Aristotle 300 New York : Columbia University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle . “ [4] ” . In Metaphysics XII.7.1072b30–1073al
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle . “ [1] ” . In De interpretation 1 16a3–8
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle . “ [3] ” . In De anima III.4.429a21–4
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., III.2.425b25–426al9; 5.430al9–20; 7.431al-2; 8.431b20–3
   Google Scholar
• Augustine . “ [2] ” . In De magistro 23 – 49 . 12.40; 48.5
   Google Scholar
• Russell . 1959 . My Philosophical Development 230 London : George Allen & Unwin .
   Google Scholar
• 1988 . Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association , 62 Gary Brent Madison, ‘Hermeneutics and (the) Tradition,’ 169
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle . “ [4] ” . In Metaphysics XII.9.1074b35–6
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., IV.2.1003b22–30
   Google Scholar
• Aquinas . Scriptum super Sententiis 1 36.1.3 ad lm; Thomas Aquinas [2], I, 836
   Google Scholar
• Aquinas . Quaestiones quodlibetales 159 – 60 . 8.1.1. Resp.; Thomas Aquinas [10]
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle . “ [3] ” . In De Anima III.8.431b28–432a3; cf. I.5.410al-12
   Google Scholar
• Aquinas , Thomas . “ [8] ” . In De veritate 2 2.Solut.; Thomas Aquinas [1] vol. XXII, 44.118–33
   Google Scholar
• 1990 . American Philosophical Quarterly , 27 : 199 – 212 . For a discussion of this topic, see Susan Haack, ‘Recent Obituaries of Epistemology,’
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke . An Essay Concerning Human Understanding 1 1.4; John Locke [1], 44–5. Cf. ibid., ‘Epistle to the Reader,’ 7.
   Google Scholar
• Russell , Bertrand . 1924 . Contemporary British Philosophy Edited by: Muirhead , J. H. London : George Allen & Unwin . Cf. “I could no longer believe that knowing makes any difference to what is known” [First Series], [], 360). This was in reaction to the argument previously accepted from Bradley that a thing may be altered in the process of being known: “And you cannot ever get your product standing apart from its process” (Francis Herbert Bradley, Appearance and Reality, 9th imp. [Oxford: Clarendon 1930], 23).
   Google Scholar