108
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PART II Probing the Orthodox Dichotomy

Democracy and Nationalism

Pages 159-195 | Published online: 01 Jul 2013

References

  • 1970 . Qu'est-ce que le Tiers état “[A] body of associates living under a common law and represented by the same legislature.” E. Sieyès, critical edition with an introduction and notes by R. Zapperi (Genève: Droz, 126
  • Renaut , A. 1988 . “Les deux logiques de l'idée de Nation,” in ” . In Cahiers de philosophie politique et juridique nr. 14, 7ff
  • Acton , J. E. 1862 . Essays in the Liberal Interpretation of History: Selected Papers Chicago : University of Chicago Press . “Nationality” [], in his ed. and with an introduction by W.H. McNeill 1967), 140
  • Meinecke , Fr. 1908 . Weltbürgertum und Nationalstaat [] (München: Oldenbourg 1969), 10ff. Meinecke admits that he does not intend this distinction to be absolute. Pure cultural nations with no contribution by political factors are as rare as state nations with no cultural element.
  • 1943 . The Modern Democratic State 614 – 15 . London : Oxford University Press . “A state becomes a nation when instead of its members being primarily divided between sovereign and subject, government and citizenship become a common task, demanding not passive citizenship but active cooperation from all.” A.D. Lindsay, I, 151, quoted in R.A. Nisbet, “Citizenship: Two Traditions,” in Social Research 41 (1974)
  • Dann , O. and Wehler , H.-U. , eds. 1991 . Weltbürgertum Göttingen : Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht . The fact that states are often called nations, as in the expression “United Nations Organization,” does not contradict this but is a result of the modern principle of legitimacy which accepts only the nation-state as a legitimate state, i.e., the state which has become a state of some nation. Cf. Meinecke, 286; Th. Schieder, Nationalismus und Nationalstaat. Studien zum nationalen Problem im modernen Europa, 17.
  • “Sense for autonomous political conviction and free political activity”
  • Meinecke . 1990 . Weltbürgertum Edited by: Mann , M. Vol. 17 , 210 – 11 . 31, 37; W.J. Mommsen, “The Varieties of the Nation State in Modern History: Liberal, Imperialist, Fascist and Contemporary Notions of Nation and Nationality,” in The Rise and Decline of the Nation State (London: Basil Blackwell
  • Geertz , C. , ed. 1963 . Old Societies and New States: The Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa New York : The Free Press . “What the civic sense more than anything else seems to involve is a definite concept of the public as a separate and distinct body and an attendant notion of a genuine public interest, which though not necessarily superior to, is independent of and at times even in conflict with both private and other sorts of collective interest.” C. Geertz in 156.
  • 1914 . Although this process of emancipation was carried out in the name of universal claims, the natural rights of individuals, and the sovereignty of the people, in reality it was from the outset the emancipation of a particular group which identified itself with the nation. As already mentioned, the nation was originally seen as equivalent to the third estate, even to the extent of excluding the nobility and clergy insofar as they refused to subscribe to the terms of the social contract and the universal principles of the revolution. There is little doubt that this identification of the nation with the bourgeoisie influenced the attitude of socialists and Marxists toward nationalism. In 1848–9, the workers still supported the national struggle. They believed a solution to the national question was a precondition for solving the social question. However, when the bourgeoisie rejected the notion that national emancipation also entailed the emancipation of the fourth estate, the workers turned against national movements. But demonstrated once more that this was more an appearance than a reality.
  • Rawls , J. 1993 . Political liberalism New York : Columbia University Press . 29ff., 48ff., 79
  • Renan , E. 1882 . Qu'est qu'une nation 27 Paris : Calmann Lévy . In the words of Meinecke, Weltbürgertum, 12: “Nation ist, was eine Nation sein will” [”A nation is what wants to be a nation”].
  • 1990 . Nationalism and International Society Cambridge : Cambridge University Press . The abstractness of this point of view can be seen from the fact that a people must first be identified before a plebiscite can be taken (J. Mayall, [], 41). Furthermore, a plebiscite will never solve the problem of minorities. Despite the theoretical acceptance of the principle of nationality in 1919, the map of Europe was redrawn according to pragmatic strategies and political criteria. Even in those states which were decolonized after World War II, borders were frozen without a plebiscite. Cf. Mayall, 56.
  • Meinecke . Weltbürgertum 71 According to Meinecke, this “formalistically” conceived idea of national sovereignty is blind to the nation in a historical, “substantial” sense.
  • 1994 . La communauté des citoyens. Sur l'idée moderne de nation Paris : Gallimard . For many commentators, the absence of a “they” at this level is an argument supporting the view that belonging to humanity can never be a truly subjective, existential feeling, but only a rational construction of the mind. See, most recently, D. Schnapper, 183.
  • Nationalism and International Society This “realism” is also apparent in the way in which a people's right to self-determination was conventionally interpreted after the Treaty of Versailles. It was reserved for the peoples of the disintegrating multinational Empires, and (later) for ex-colonies. Cf. Mayall, 50ff.
  • 1990 . Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality Cambridge : Cambridge University Press . The term “patriot” did not originally refer to someone who professed blind allegiance to his country (”my country, right or wrong”), but rather to someone who worked to renew and reform the nation according to the principles of natural law. Americans and Dutchmen used the term in this sense, around 1780. The “patria” which is the object of a patriot's loyalty is no existential, pre-existing unity, but a nation to which its members can consent. Cf. E.J. Hobsbawm, 87.
  • Renan . Qu'est qu'une nation 26
  • Meinecke , Fr. Weltbürgertum 248 – 9 .
  • Mayall . Nationalism and International Society 92
  • Mayall . Nationalism and International Society 57
  • Rawls . Political Liberalism , 217 253 23
  • Schnapper . La communauté des citoyens 155
  • 1971 . Reden an die Deutsche Nation This problem is also I.G. Fichte's starting point in in Fichtes Werke (Hrsg. I.H. Fichte), Bd. VII, Zur Politik und Philosophie der Geschichte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 26ff.
  • Alter , P. 1990 . Nationalism 39 London : Edward Arnold . Later, the republic will in fact take on the task of forging this unity and determination of the will via republican education in J. Ferry's école laïque. Although in principle, this indoctrination does not refer to language and soil, but to the values of the republic, in reality the reference is to “la France”, “la République” simultaneously.
  • Nationalism Alter, 39
  • 1970 . Projet de Constitution pour la Corse 69 – 84 . Undoubtedly, Rousseau is thought of in the first place as a promoter of republican patriotism. Nevertheless, there are already announcements of this transition in his thinking. In his (in Oeuvres Complètes, T. III, Ed. de la Pléiade [Paris: Gallimard], 913) he states: “La première règle que nous avons à suivre est le caractère nationnal. Tout peuple a ou doit avoir un caractère nationnal et s'il en manquoit il faudroit commencer par le lui donner” [”The first rule to be followed is the principle of national character; for each people has, or ought to have, a national character; if it did not, we should have to start by giving it one”]. And in his Considerations sur le gouvernement de Pologne et sur sa réformation projettée (in idem, 960) we read: “La vertu de ses Citoyens, leur zèle patriotique, la forme particulière que des institutions nationales peuvent donner à leurs âmes, voila le seul rempart toujours prêt à la défendre, et qu'aucune armée ne sauroit forcer [.] Ce sont les institutions nationales qui forment le génie, le caractère, les goûts, et les moeurs d'un peuple, qui le font être lui et non pas un autre, qui lui inspirent cet ardent amour de la patrie fondé sur des habitudes impossibles à déraciner, qui le font mourir d'ennui chez les autres peuples au sein des délices dont il est privé dans le sien” [The virtue of its citizens, their patriotic zeal, the distinctive form which its national institutions may give their soul, this is the only rampart that will stand ever ready to defend it, and which no army could subdue by force. It is national institutions which form the genius, the character, the tastes, and the morals of a people, which make it be itself and not another, which inspire in it that ardent love of fatherland founded on habits impossible to uproot, which cause it to die of boredom among other peoples in the midst of delights of which it is deprived in its own”]. For an examination of the ramifications of these texts within the thought of Rousseau, see R. Derathé, “Patriotisme et nationalisme au XVIIIe siècle,” in M. Albertini et al., L'idée de Nation (Annales de Philosophie Politique, 8) (Paris: PUF 1969)
  • “The theory of nationality is involved in the democratic theory of the sovereignty of the general will.” Acton, ‘Nationality,’ 147.
  • “Thus after surrendering the individual to the collective will, the revolutionary system makes the collective will subject to conditions which are independent of it, and rejects all law, only to be controlled by an accident.” Acton, ‘Nationality,’ 159.
  • Nations and Nationalism For an example of an early mixture of both concepts of nationhood, see Hobsbawm, 20ff.
  • 1960 . Nationalism: A Religion This intertwining of nationalism with (pseudo)religious language has been noted by C.J.H. Hayes. See his (New York. The relation between nationalism and religion (or fundamentalism) is in fact extremely complex. Often religion competes with the nation by claiming exclusive loyalty. See, for example, Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism, 67ff., 168ff.
  • This difference in virulence most likely has to do with the fact that nations which can count on a sufficiently high degree of internal cohesion can also afford to tolerate more liberal and subjective elements in the state. If this is not the case, unity and homogeneity must be compelled by force.
  • Weber , E. 1976 . Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914 (Stanford
  • Mommsen , W. J. “ ‘Varieties of the Nation State,’ 215ff.; Hobsbawm ” . In Nations and Nationalism 80ff
  • “La coïncidence entre unité politique et communauté culturelle a été l'idéal politique de la nation, ce n'en est pas pour autant le type-idéal, au sens analytique du terme” [”The coincidence of political unity and cultural community has been the political ideal of the nation. It was, however, not its ideal type in the analytical sense of the word”]. Schnapper, La communauté des citoyens, 43.
  • La communauté des citoyens [”transcendence by the abstract political society, but also a social reality concretely inscribed in time and space.“] Schnapper, 82.
  • In this connection, it should not be overlooked that the idea of nationhood sets in motion a dynamic which moves in the direction of the welfare state. Indeed, the very idea of integrating all individuals into one single political bond has consequences not only for the diversity of ethnic groups and regions, but also for social and economic disparities. The principle of the equal value of every citizen which forms the basis of the logic of the nation may not be contradicted by too great a social or economic inequality. A generalized citizenship cannot really, nor symbolically compensate for this. The nation-state, therefore, has felt itself to be increasingly responsible for the economic and social development of the nation.
  • Acton, ‘Natinality,’ 157
  • This explains why the thought of Herder and Fichte also contain references to humanism and universalism. Similarly, Renan was not insensitive to the ethnic element in the concept of a nation. Just as in the first section, then, this is also a description of an ideal type.
  • Mommsen . ‘Varieties of the Nation State,’ 214
  • Nationalismus und Nationalstaat Because of this, Theodor Schieder believes that the nationalist politics of these empires has not been correctly evaluated (Schieder, 30ff.). On his view, the dynastic principle and personal union offered more possibilities for freedom and plurality than the idea of the self-determination of a fictive “einheitlich nationale Demokratie” [unitary national democracy”] (Schieder, 21). In such a case, the sovereign can appear as a neutral (non-national) mediator who, far removed from social and national groups, can apply justice.
  • 1991 . Weltbürgertum Thus, paradoxically, modern individualism acquires more depth. Cf. Meinecke, 168ff.; L. Dumont, Essais sur l'individualisme. Une perspective anthropologique sur l'idéologie moderne (Points) (Paris: Editions du Seuil, 134ff.
  • Meinecke . Weltbürgertum 19 – 20 . 189; The state is national because it is the product of a specific national soul or Volksgeist, not of the will of the people. In the same sense, the Historical Law School opposes the doctrines of natural law. According to this school, all law arises intrinsically from customs, tradition, and popular belief. On “national” science, see Meinecke, Weltbürgertum, 125ff.
  • Meinecke . Weltbürgertum 247 – 8 .
  • Von Ranke , L. 1836 . Politisches Gespräch 246 – 7 . [], quoted in Meinecke, Weltbürgertum
  • Fichte . Reden an die Deutsche Nation 313ff., 359ff
  • “Hier heiszt es nicht: Eine Nation ist, was eine Nation sein will,—sondern umgekehrt: Eine Nation ist, mögen die Einzelnen, aus denen sie besteht, ihr zugehören wollen oder nicht. Sie beruht nicht auf freier Selbstbestimmung, sondern auf Determination” [”Here we do not say: a nation is what wants to be a nation. The contrary is true. A nation exists whether the individuals wish to belong to it or not. It is not rooted in free self-determination but in determinacy”]. Meinecke, Weltbürgertum, 247. As a result, revolutionaries consider this view to be undemocratic and irrational.
  • 1991 . Modernity and Ambivalence Cambridge : Polity Press . Assimilation is, on this view, impossible. Nationalists of the Romantic nation saw the high degree of assimilation by the German Jews as proof of their perfidy and of the extent to which they had already compromised the purity of the Volksgeist. On this point, see Z. Bauman, 102ff., 121.
  • Meinecke . Weltbürgertum 130 The introduction of a British-style parliamentary democracy would therefore be like planting a foreign (British) flower on German soil. At the same time, the liberal constitution is identified with a materialistic, utilitarian bourgeois society, such that loyalty to the Volksgeist entails loyalty to a way of life which transcends egoism.
  • Meinecke . Weltbürgertum 78
  • Meinecke . Weltbürgertum 225 – 6 .
  • Fichte . Reden an die Deutsche Nation 384ff
  • Meinecke . Weltbürgertum 252 It is the task of the intellectuals to keep the nation alive and guide it by interpreting its deepest nature and singularity.
  • Arendt , H. 1958 . The Human Condition London : University . (Chicago- of Chicago Press, 214
  • Habermas , J. 1992 . Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaat Suhrkamp : Frankfurt am Main . 190ff
  • It is a strange but perhaps not entirely fortuitous coincidence that Rousseau's project, which tries to elevate the “public” into a completely transparent nation, seems so easily to undergo a reversal into a completely “privatized,” ethnic nation. The totalitarianism of universality seems here to touch on that of particularity. It seems that only a simultaneous recognition of particularity and universality can shield us from totalitarianism.
  • Acton, ‘Nationality,’ 149
  • 1977 . Democracies in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration New Haven : Yale University Press . This is indirectly confirmed by the thesis that the functioning of consociative democracies presupposes a sufficiently unified elite with a “common background and outlook.” Cf. A. Lijphart, 168.
  • Acton, (‘Nationality,’ 150ff.) sees the coexistence of several nations in a single state as a source of progress. Diversity and difference are “resources” and “incentives.” When national and political borders coincide, society is at risk of sclerosis, of reverting to itself.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.