126
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
IV. Political Implications of Feminist Relational Approaches

The Importance of Ontology for Feminist Policy-making in the Realm of Reproductive Technology

Pages 273-295 | Published online: 01 Jul 2013

References

  • I wish to thank all those who generously commented on earlier drafts of this paper, particularly Richmond Campbell, Sue Campbell, Jeffrey Nisker, and Jason Scott Robert.
  • In practice, women are often allowed some relief on the high costs of the treatment if they agree to “donate” their eggs to other women or to science. These financial incentives call into question the voluntariness of their “donations.”
  • Nisker , J. and Gore-Layton , R. E. 1995 . “Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Model of Progress and Concern.” . Journal of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada , 17 : 247 – 61 .
  • Boyle , R. J. and Savulescu , J. 2001 . “Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person.” . British Medical Journal , 323 : 534 – 38 . (7323): 1240–43. G. Pennings, R. Schots and I. Liebars, “Ethical considerations on preimplantation genetic diagnosis for HLA typing to match a future child as a donor of haematopietic stem cells to a sibling.” Human Reproduction 17 (2002):
  • Religious arguments tend to become marginalized in the secularized context of Canadian policy-making. While they are respected as sincere and important to individuals, the logic of liberal individualism relegates religious conviction to the “private sphere” to be celebrated as part of the diverse cultural mosaic of the nation but an inappropriate basis for social policy. Given the conservative nature of most traditional religions and their tendency to embrace policies oppressive to women, I have no interest in challenging this response to policy arguments based solely on religious beliefs.
  • 2003 . After more than ten years of reflection, including a four-year-long, multi-million- dollar Royal Commission investigation and two previous efforts at legislation that did not make it to final passage, the Canadian government recently (fall 2002) introduced legislation that will regulate reproductive technologies (Bill C-13). The government has expressed its intention of bringing this bill back to the floor of the House of Commons for final reading in the spring of
  • Sherwin , S. 1998 . “ coordinator ” . In Feminist Health Care Ethics Research Network. The Politics of Women's Health: Exploring Agency and Autonomy Edited by: Mackenzie , C. and Stoljar , N. Philadelphia , PA : Temple University Press . Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).
  • Wolf , S. M. 1999 . “Erasing Difference: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender in Bioethics,” in ” . In Embodying Bioethics: Recent Feminist Advances Edited by: Donchin , A. and Purdy , L. M. Lanham , MD : Rowman and Littlefield .
  • On Liberty While moral theorists differ on many important matters, most of the reigning moral theories of the West treat respect for individual autonomy as foundational. For example, protection of the freedom of individual persons to pursue their own conception of the good is a core value of Kantian, rights-based, and social contract moral theories. Even utilitarians believe that respect for individual autonomy is extremely important, if only for extrinsic reasons. (John Stuart Mill was the author of as well as Utilitarianism).
  • 1971 . A Theory of Justice Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press . Some theorists, e.g., Rawls, treat families or households as the basic unit of analysis at certain levels. See John Rawls,. This practice carries with it a host of other concerns for feminists, as has been articulated by Susan Moller Okin. See S. M. Okin, Justice, Gender, and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989).
  • 1992 . The Millbank Quarterly , 70 This is a significant demand. It appears that at present few women actually receive the level of counseling a genuine commitment to informed consent would require and that there are nowhere near the number of trained counselors available to meet the need associated with such a commitment. For a sense of the scope of the problem regarding a single genetic disease, see B. Wilfond and N. C. Fost, “The Introduction of Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Screening into Clinical Practics: Policy Considerations.”: 629.
  • Robertson , J. A. 1994 . Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
  • Sherwin , S. 1992 . No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care Philadelphia , PA : Temple University Press .
  • Rothman , B. K. 1986 . The Tentative Pregnancy: Prenatal Diagnosis and the Future of Motherhood New York : Viking .
  • Young , I. M. 1990 . Justice and the Politics of Difference Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
  • This does not mean that every member of an oppressed group has less power than every member of a dominant group, of course. Obviously, there are some very powerful women in society. It is that women, collectively, have less power than men collectively (and similarly, people of color have less power than white people, people with disabilities have less power than those without disabilities, and so on). Indeed, it is the relative power of groups— rather than of each individual member— that is at issue here.
  • Sherwin , S. No Longer Patient.
  • Baier , A. 1985 . Postures of the Mind: Essays on Mind and Morals Minneapolis , MN : University of Minnesota Press .
  • Sherwin , S. “ coordinator. ” . In Feminist Health Care Ethics Research Network Mackenzie and Stoljar, Relational Autonomy
  • 1989 . Self, Society, and Personal Choice New York : Columbia University Press . Diana Tietjens Meyers
  • Rothman , B. K. 1991 . The Tentative Pregnancy. , A. Lippman, “Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequalities,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 17: 15–50. S. Sherwin, “Normalizing Reproductive Technologies and the Implications for Autonomy,” in Globalizing Feminist Bioethics, ed. G. Anderson, A. Santos, and R. Tong (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2001).
  • Young , I. M. Justice and the Politics of Difference.
  • Ibid.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.