Why we should not identify sentence structure with propositional structure

REFERENCES

• Bach, Kent. 1994. “Conversational Impliciture.” Mind and Language9 (2): 124–162. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, Kent. 2001. “You Don't Say?” Synthese128: 15–44. 10.1023/A:1010353722852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, Alexander, and EmmaTobin. 2012. “Natural Kinds.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N.Zalta, 2012 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/natural-kinds/..
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, Herman, and ErnieLepore. 2007. “The Myth of Unarticulated Constituents: Essays on the Philosophy of John Perry.” In Situating Semantics, edited by MichaelO'Rourke, and CoreyWashington. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, John. 2007. “Syntax, More or Less.” Mind116 (464): 805–850. 10.1093/mind/fzm805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, John. 2010. “Naturalism in the Philosophy of Language; Or Why There is No Such Thing as Language.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Language, edited by SarahSawyer. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, John. 2013. “Cutting it (too) Fine.” Philosophical Studies. 10.1007/s11098-013-0163-1.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, Gilbert. 1970. “Deep Structure as Logical Form.” Synthese21: 275–297. 10.1007/BF00484801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, John, and ErnieLepore. 2011. “On Words.” The Journal of Philosophy108 (9): 447–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, Richard G., and RobertMay. 2011. “The Composition of Thoughts.” Noûs45 (1): 126–166. 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00769.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, Irene Roswitha, and AngelikaKratzer. 1997. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Thomas. 2013. “Propositions: An Essay on Linguistic Content.” PhD diss., University of St Andrews.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, David. 1990. “Words.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society64: 93–119. 10.2307/4106880.
   Google Scholar
• King, Jeffrey C.2007. The Nature and Structure of Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226061.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• King, Jeffrey C.2009. “Questions of Unity.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society109: 257–277. 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2009.00267.x.
   Google Scholar
• King, Jeffrey C.2012. “Structured Propositions.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N.Zalta, 2012 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/propositions-structured/..
   Google Scholar
• King, Jeffrey C.2013a. “Propositional Unity: What's the Problem, Who Has it and Who Solves it?” Philosophical Studies165: 71–93. 10.1007/s11098-012-9920-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Jeffrey C.2013b. “On Fineness of Grain.” Philosophical Studies163 (3): 763–781. 10.1007/s11098-011-9844-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Jeffrey C., and JasonStanley. 2005. “Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Role of Semantic Content.” In Semantics versus Pragmatics, edited by Zoltán GendlerSzabó. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.003.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, Luisa. 2006. “Unarticulated Constituents Revisited.” Linguistics and Philosophy29: 135–166. 10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, John. 1986. “Thought without Representation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volumes60: 137–152. 10.2307/4106900.
   Google Scholar
• Recanati, François. 2002. “Unarticulated Constituents.” Linguistics and Philosophy25: 299–345. 10.1023/A:1015267930510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615382.
   Google Scholar
• Recanati, François. 2007. “It is Raining (Somewhere).” Linguistics and Philosophy30: 123–146. 10.1007/s10988-006-9007-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recanati, François. 2010. Truth-conditional Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Sennet, Adam. 2011. “Unarticulated Constituents and Propositional Structure.” Mind and Language26 (4): 412–435. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01423.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soames, Scott. 1987. “Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content.” Philosophical Topics15 (1): 47–87. 10.5840/philtopics198715112.
   Google Scholar
• Soames, Scott. 2008. “The Gap between Meaning and Assertion: Why What We Literally Say Often Differs from What Our Words Literally Mean.” In Philosophical Essays. Vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, Dan, and DeirdreWilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ednOxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton, Robert J.2005. “In Defense of Non-sentential Assertion.” In Semantics versus Pragmatics, edited by Zoltán GendlerSzabó. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251520.003.0011.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, Jason. 2000. “Context and Logical Form.” Linguistics and Philosophy23: 391–434. 10.1023/A:1005599312747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar