The extension of color sensations: Reid, Stewart, and Fearn

REFERENCES

• Atherton, Margaret. 2005. “Reading Lady Mary Shepherd.” Harvard Review of Philosophy13 (2): 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bréhier, Émile. 1937. “Matière cartesienne et creation.” Revue de Métaphysique et Morale44 (1): 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Thomas. 1820. Lectures on the Philosophy of the Human Mind. Edinburgh: Tait.
   Google Scholar
• Falkenstein, Lorne. 2000. “Reid's Account of Localization.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research61 (2): 305–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenstein, Lorne. 2005. “Condillac's Paradox.” Journal of the History of Philosophy43 (4): 403–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenstein, Lorne, and GiovanniGrandi. 2003. “The Role of Material Impressions in Reid's Theory of Vision: A Critique of Gideon Yaffe's ‘Reid on the Perception of Visible Figure’.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy1 (2): 117–133.
   Google Scholar
• Fearn, John. 1810/1812. An Essay on Consciousness; or a Series of Evidences of a Distinct Mind. 1st edition 1810, 2nd edition 1812.London: Printed by D. Cock; and Published by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown; and by Black, Parry, and Kingbury.
   Google Scholar
• Fearn, John. 1813a. A Review of First Principles of Bishop Berkeley, Dr. Reid, and Professor Stewart. With an Indication of Other Principles. London: Printed by D. Cock for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown; and Black and Parry.
   Google Scholar
• Fearn, John. 1813b. Essay on External Perception. Enlarged edition, appended to A Review of First Principles of Bishop Berkeley, Dr. Reid, and Professor Stewart. London: Printed by D. Cock for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown; and Black and Parry.
   Google Scholar
• Fearn, John. 1815a. A Demonstration of the Principles of Primary Vision. With the Consequent State of Philosophy in Great Britain. London: Printed by D. Cock for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown; and Black and Parry.
   Google Scholar
• Fearn, John. 1815b. A Demonstration of Necessary Connexion. London: Printed by D. Cock for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown; and Black and Parry.
   Google Scholar
• Fearn, John. 1818. “A Letter to Professor Stewart, on the Objects of General Terms and on the Axiomatical Laws of Vision. Second Edition. To which are here added some Remarks on the Monthly Review on this Subject.” In The Pamphleteer. vol. 12. London: Printed by A.J. Valpy. Sold by Fenner; Lloyd; Black; Kingbury, Parbury, and Allen.
   Google Scholar
• Fearn, John. 1820. First Lines of the Human Mind. London: Printed by A.J. Valpy; and Sold by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown; Black, Kingbury, Parbury and Allen; and Roland Hunter. [References by chapter, section, and page numbers].
   Google Scholar
• Fearn, John. 1829. A Manual of the Physiology of Mind, Comprehending the First Principles of Physical Theology: with which are Laid Out the Crucial Objections to the Reidian Theory. To which is Suffixed a Paper on the Logic of Relations Considered as a Machine for Rationative Science. London: Printed by A.J. Valpy; Sold by Longman, Rees, Orme, and Green; and Hunter. [References by section and page numbers].
   Google Scholar
• Fearn, John. 1837. An Appeal to Philosophers, by Name, on the Demonstration of Vision in the Brain, and Against the Attack by Sir David Brewster on the Rationale of Cerebral Vision. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, Gary. 1990. The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by David FateNorton and Mary J.Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [References by book, part, section, and paragraph numbers].
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheson, Francis. 2002. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on Moral Sense, edited by AaronGarrett. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Michael J.1977. Molyneux's Question: Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, Ryan. 2007. Thomas Reid's Theory of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pastore, Nicholas. 1971. Selective History of Theories of Visual Perception: 1650–1950. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. 1880. The Works of Thomas Reid, D.D., with Notes and Supplementary Dissertations, edited by WilliamHamilton. 2 vols,8th edition. Edinburgh: MacLachlan and Stewart.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. 1995. Thomas Reid on the Animate Creation: Papers Relating to the Life Sciences, edited by WoodPaul. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. 1997. An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense: A Critical Edition, edited by Derek R.Brookes. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press. [References by chapter, section, page, and line numbers].
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. 2002a. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man: A Critical Edition, edited by Derek R.Brookes. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press. [References by essay, chapter, page, and line numbers].
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. 2002b. The Correspondence of Thomas Reid, edited by PaulWood. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. 2012. Selected Philosophical Writings, edited by Giovanni B.Grandi. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Dugald. 1792. Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind. London: A. Strahan and T. Cadell, and Edinburgh: W. Creech.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Dugald. 1854. Dissertation: Exhibiting the Progress of Metaphysical, Ethical and Political Philosophy since the Revival of Letters in Europe. In The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, edited by WilliamHamilton. Vol. 1. Edinburgh: T. Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Dugald. 1855. Philosophical Essays. In The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, edited by WilliamHamilton. Vol. 5. Edinburgh: T. Constable.
   Google Scholar
• Yaffe, Gideon. 2003a. “Reid on the Perception of Visible Figure.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy1 (2): 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Yaffe, Gideon. 2003b. “The Office of an Introspectible Sensation: A Reply to Falkenstein and Grandi.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy1 (2): 135–140.
   Google Scholar