99
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perception

The extension of color sensations: Reid, Stewart, and Fearn

Pages 50-79 | Received 15 May 2013, Accepted 17 Nov 2013, Published online: 25 Sep 2014

REFERENCES

  • Atherton, Margaret. 2005. “Reading Lady Mary Shepherd.” Harvard Review of Philosophy13 (2): 73–85.
  • Bréhier, Émile. 1937. “Matière cartesienne et creation.” Revue de Métaphysique et Morale44 (1): 21–34.
  • Brown, Thomas. 1820. Lectures on the Philosophy of the Human Mind. Edinburgh: Tait.
  • Falkenstein, Lorne. 2000. “Reid's Account of Localization.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research61 (2): 305–328.
  • Falkenstein, Lorne. 2005. “Condillac's Paradox.” Journal of the History of Philosophy43 (4): 403–435.
  • Falkenstein, Lorne, and GiovanniGrandi. 2003. “The Role of Material Impressions in Reid's Theory of Vision: A Critique of Gideon Yaffe's ‘Reid on the Perception of Visible Figure’.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy1 (2): 117–133.
  • Fearn, John. 1810/1812. An Essay on Consciousness; or a Series of Evidences of a Distinct Mind. 1st edition 1810, 2nd edition 1812.London: Printed by D. Cock; and Published by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown; and by Black, Parry, and Kingbury.
  • Fearn, John. 1813a. A Review of First Principles of Bishop Berkeley, Dr. Reid, and Professor Stewart. With an Indication of Other Principles. London: Printed by D. Cock for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown; and Black and Parry.
  • Fearn, John. 1813b. Essay on External Perception. Enlarged edition, appended to A Review of First Principles of Bishop Berkeley, Dr. Reid, and Professor Stewart. London: Printed by D. Cock for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown; and Black and Parry.
  • Fearn, John. 1815a. A Demonstration of the Principles of Primary Vision. With the Consequent State of Philosophy in Great Britain. London: Printed by D. Cock for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown; and Black and Parry.
  • Fearn, John. 1815b. A Demonstration of Necessary Connexion. London: Printed by D. Cock for Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown; and Black and Parry.
  • Fearn, John. 1818. “A Letter to Professor Stewart, on the Objects of General Terms and on the Axiomatical Laws of Vision. Second Edition. To which are here added some Remarks on the Monthly Review on this Subject.” In The Pamphleteer. vol. 12. London: Printed by A.J. Valpy. Sold by Fenner; Lloyd; Black; Kingbury, Parbury, and Allen.
  • Fearn, John. 1820. First Lines of the Human Mind. London: Printed by A.J. Valpy; and Sold by Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown; Black, Kingbury, Parbury and Allen; and Roland Hunter. [References by chapter, section, and page numbers].
  • Fearn, John. 1829. A Manual of the Physiology of Mind, Comprehending the First Principles of Physical Theology: with which are Laid Out the Crucial Objections to the Reidian Theory. To which is Suffixed a Paper on the Logic of Relations Considered as a Machine for Rationative Science. London: Printed by A.J. Valpy; Sold by Longman, Rees, Orme, and Green; and Hunter. [References by section and page numbers].
  • Fearn, John. 1837. An Appeal to Philosophers, by Name, on the Demonstration of Vision in the Brain, and Against the Attack by Sir David Brewster on the Rationale of Cerebral Vision. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green.
  • Hatfield, Gary. 1990. The Natural and the Normative: Theories of Spatial Perception from Kant to Helmholtz. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hume, David. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by David FateNorton and Mary J.Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [References by book, part, section, and paragraph numbers].
  • Hutcheson, Francis. 2002. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on Moral Sense, edited by AaronGarrett. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
  • Morgan, Michael J.1977. Molyneux's Question: Vision, Touch and the Philosophy of Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nichols, Ryan. 2007. Thomas Reid's Theory of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pastore, Nicholas. 1971. Selective History of Theories of Visual Perception: 1650–1950. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Reid, Thomas. 1880. The Works of Thomas Reid, D.D., with Notes and Supplementary Dissertations, edited by WilliamHamilton. 2 vols,8th edition. Edinburgh: MacLachlan and Stewart.
  • Reid, Thomas. 1995. Thomas Reid on the Animate Creation: Papers Relating to the Life Sciences, edited by WoodPaul. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Reid, Thomas. 1997. An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense: A Critical Edition, edited by Derek R.Brookes. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press. [References by chapter, section, page, and line numbers].
  • Reid, Thomas. 2002a. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man: A Critical Edition, edited by Derek R.Brookes. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press. [References by essay, chapter, page, and line numbers].
  • Reid, Thomas. 2002b. The Correspondence of Thomas Reid, edited by PaulWood. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Reid, Thomas. 2012. Selected Philosophical Writings, edited by Giovanni B.Grandi. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
  • Stewart, Dugald. 1792. Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind. London: A. Strahan and T. Cadell, and Edinburgh: W. Creech.
  • Stewart, Dugald. 1854. Dissertation: Exhibiting the Progress of Metaphysical, Ethical and Political Philosophy since the Revival of Letters in Europe. In The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, edited by WilliamHamilton. Vol. 1. Edinburgh: T. Constable.
  • Stewart, Dugald. 1855. Philosophical Essays. In The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, edited by WilliamHamilton. Vol. 5. Edinburgh: T. Constable.
  • Yaffe, Gideon. 2003a. “Reid on the Perception of Visible Figure.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy1 (2): 103–115.
  • Yaffe, Gideon. 2003b. “The Office of an Introspectible Sensation: A Reply to Falkenstein and Grandi.” Journal of Scottish Philosophy1 (2): 135–140.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.