REFERENCES
- Barrett, Justin. 2009. “Cognitive Science, Religion, and Theology.” In The Believing Primate. Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origins of Religion, edited by JeffreySchloss and MichaelMurray, 76–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dennett, Daniel, and AlvinPlantinga. 2011. Science and Religion. Are they Compatible?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Feldman, Richard, and Ted A.Warfield, eds. 2010. Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kelly, Thomas. 2011. “Consensus Gentium: Reflections on the ‘common consent’ argument for the existence of God.” In Evidence and religious belief, edited by Kelly JamesClark and Ray J.Vanarragon, 135–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ratzsch, Del. 2001. Nature, Science, Design. The Status of Design in Natural Science. New York: SUNY Press.
- Ratzsch, Del. 2003. “Perceiving Design.” In God and Design. The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, edited by Neil A.Manson. London: Routledge.
- Reid, Thomas. 1763 [2002]. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Edited by DerekBrookes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Van Woudenberg, René. 2013. “Thomas Reid Between Externalism and Internalism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy51: 75–92.
- Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 2001. Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.