REFERENCES
- Castagnetto, Susan. 1992. “Reid's answer to abstract ideas.” Journal of philosophical research17: 39–60.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian linguistics: a chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.
- Cuneo, Terrence, and Renevan Woudenberg, eds. 2004. The Cambridge companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Grice, H. P.1957. “Meaning.” The Philosophical Review66 (3): 377–388.
- Grice, H. P.1969. “Utterer's meaning and intention.” The Philosophical Review78 (2): 147–177.
- Immerwahr, John. 1978. “The development of Reid's realism.” The Monist61: 245–256.
- Jensen, Henning. 1979. “Reid and Wittgenstein on philosophy and language.” Philosophical studies36: 359–376.
- Newman, Lex, ed. 2007. The Cambridge companion to Locke's “essay concerning human understanding”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Reid, Thomas. 1764 [1997]. An inquiry into the human mind on the principles of common sense, edited by Derek R.Brookes. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
- Winkler, Kenneth P., ed. 2005. The Cambridge companion to Berkeley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112444/Skyscraper-humanities.png"})