References
- Allison, Henry. 1983. Kant's Transcendental Idealism – An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Allison, Henry. 2004. Kant's Transcendental Idealism – An Interpretation and Defense. Revised and Enlarged Edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Anderson, R. Lanier. 2004. “It Adds Up After All: Kant's Philosophy of Arithmetic in Light of the Traditional Logic.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research69 (3): 501–540.
- Anderson, R. Lanier. Forthcoming. The Poverty of Conceptual Truth: Kant's Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Buroker, Jill Vance. 2006. Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Carson, Emily. 1997. “Kant on Intuition in Geometry.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy57 (4): 489–512.
- Descartes, René. 1964–1974. Oeuvres de Descartes, edited by CharlesAdam and PaulTannery. 12 vols.Revised Edition. Paris: J. Vrin [AT].
- Domski, Mary. 2008. “Kant's Argument for the Infinity of Space.” In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants – Akten des X. internationalen Kant-Kongresses, edited by ValerioRohden, RicardoRerra, Guidode Almeida, and MargitRuffing. 2 vols, 149–159. New York: De Gruyter.
- Engstrom, Stephen. 2006. “Understanding and Sensibility.” Inquiry49 (1): 2–25.
- Euclid. 1908. The Thirteen Books of Euclid's ‘Elements’. Translated and edited by T.L. Heath.3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Euler, Leonhard. 1911. “Vollständige Anleitungzur Algebra.” In Opera Omnia, edited by RudioFerdinand, AldofKrazer, and PaulStäckel, series 1, 1 vols. Tübingen: Lipsiae & Berolini.
- Ewing, A. C.1950. A Short Commentary on Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. 2nd ed.London: Metheun.
- Falkenstein, Lorne. 1995. Kant's Intuitionism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
- Friedman, Michael. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Gardner, Sebastian. 1999. Kant and the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. New York: Routledge.
- Grünbaum, Adolf. 1952. “A Consistent Conception of the Extended Linear Continuum as an Aggregate of Unextended Elements.” Philosophy of Science19 (4): 288–306.
- Guyer, Paul. 1987. Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hollis, Martin. 1967. “Times and Spaces.” Mind76 (304): 524–536.
- Kant, Immanuel. 1900. Gesammelte Schriften, edited by Deutsche Akademieder Wissenschaften. Berlin: de Gruyter.
- Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770. translated and edited by David Walford, and Ralf Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kästner, Abraham Gotthelf. 1758. Anfängsgründe der Arithmetik, Geometrie, ebenen und sphärischen Trigonometrie und Perspektiv. Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht.
- Kemp Smith, Norman. 1923. A Commentary to Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. 2nd ed.London: MacMillan.
- Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1923. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Series 6: Philosophische Schriften, edited by the Deutsche Akademieder Wissenschaften. Darmstadt: Akademie-Verlag [A].
- Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1978. Die philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, edited by C. I.Gerhardt. 7 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms [G].
- Leibniz, GottfriedWilhelm. 1981. New Essays on Human Understanding. Translated and edited by Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Levey, Samuel. 1998. “Leibniz on Mathematics and the Actually Infinite Division of Matter.” The Philosophical Review107 (1): 49–96.
- Locke, John. 1959. Essay Concerning Human Understanding, edited by AlexanderCampbell Fraser. 2 vols. New York: Dover.
- Longuenesse, Béatrice. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Meier, George Friedrich. 1752. Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre. Halle: Gebauer.
- Melnick, Arthur. 1973. Kant's Analogies of Experience. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Messina, James. Forthcoming. “Conceptual Analysis and the Essence of Space: Kant's Metaphysical Exposition Revisited.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosopie.
- Parsons, Charles. 1992. “The Transcendental Aesthetic.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant, edited by PaulGuyer, 62–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Parsons, Charles. 1998. “Infinity and Kant's Conception of the ‘Possibility of Experience’.” In Kant's ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ – Critical Essays, edited by PatriciaKitcher, 45–58. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Parsons, Charles. 2012. “Arithmetic and the Categories.” In From Kant to Husserl: Selected Essays, 109–121. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Paton, H. J.1936. Kant's Metaphysic of Experience. 2 vols. New York: MacMillan.
- Pippin, Robert. 1982. Kant's Theory of Form. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Quentin, Anthony. 1962. “Times and Spaces.” Philosophy37 (140): 130–174.
- Rosenberg, Jay F.2005. Accessing Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Rosenkoetter, Timothy, 2012. “Which Logic is Home to the (So-Called) ‘Table of Judgments’: An Unconsidered Alternative.” Unpublished manuscript.
- Schechtman, Anat. 2014. “Descartes' Argument for the Existence of the Idea of an Infinite Being.” Journal of the History of Philosophy52 (3): 487–517.
- Shabel, Lisa. 2010. “The Transcendental Aesthetic.” In The Cambridge Companion to the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’, edited by PaulGuyer, 93–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Smyth, Daniel. n.d. “Infinity and Givenness: Kant's Critical Theory of Sensibility.” PhD diss., University of Chicago.
- Strawson, P. F.1966. The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen.
- Sutherland, Daniel. 2004. “Kant's Philosophy of Mathematics and the Greek Mathematical Tradition.” The Philosophical Review113 (2): 157–201.
- Vaihinger, Hans. 1892. Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Vol. 2. Stuttgart: Union Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft.
- Wilson, Kirk Dallas. 1975. “Kant on Intuition.” Philosophical Quarterly25 (100): 247–265.