420
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Arbitrary combination and the use of signs in mathematics: Kant's 1763 Prize Essay and its Wolffian background

Pages 658-685 | Received 07 Mar 2014, Accepted 14 Jul 2014, Published online: 28 Nov 2014

References

  • Note. Kant's and Descartes's works are cited according to standard conventions and in the translations published by Cambridge University Press (except as noted). Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding is cited by chapter and paragraph number. Leibniz's Nouveaux Essais sur l'Entendement Humaine is cited by chapter and paragraph of Locke's essay and page number of the 1765 edition (Amsterdam and Paris: Eric Raspe) and in the translation of Jonathan Bennett and Peter Remnant (Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1996).
  • Anderson, R. Lanier. 2005. “The Wolffian Paradigm and its Discontents.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie87: 22–74.
  • Arndt, H. W.1965. “Christian Wolffs Stellung zur ‘Ars Characteristica Combinatoria’.” Studi e ricerche di storia della filosofia (Torina)71: 1–12.
  • Basso, Paola. 2011. “Le mythe de la démonstrabilité résiste-t-il encore?” Astérion9 (n.p.)
  • Boyer, Carl. 1956. History of Analytic Geometry. Reprint New York: Dover, 2004.
  • Capozzi, Mirella. 1981. “Kant on Mathematical Definition.” In Italian Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, edited by M. L. DallaChiara. Vol. 47, 423–452. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Capozzi, Mirella. 2011. “Philosophy and Writing.” Quaestio11: 307–350.
  • Carson, Emily. 1999. “Kant on the Method of Mathematics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy37: 629–652.
  • Corr, Charles. 1972. “Christian Wolff's Treatment of Scientific Discovery.” Journal of the History of Philosophy10: 323–334.
  • Desmaizeaux, Pierre, ed. 1720. Recueil de diverse pieces … par Mrs. Leibniz, Clarke, Newton, et autres Auteurs célèbres. Amsterdam: Duillard et Changuion.
  • Detlefsen, Michael. 2005. “Formalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, edited by S.Shapiro, 236–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dunlop, Katherine. 2012. “Kant and Strawson on the Content of Geometrical Concepts.” Nous46: 86–126.
  • Dunlop, Katherine, “Definitions and Empirical Justification in Christian Wolff's Theory of Science.” Unpublished Manuscript.
  • Engfer, H.-J.1982. Philosophie als Analyse. Studien zur Entwicklung philosophische Analysiskonzeption. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
  • Engfer, H.-J.1983. “Zur Methodendiskussion bei Wolff und Kant.” In Schneiders, 198348–65.
  • Guyer, Paul. 1991. “Mendelssohn and Kant.” Philosophical Topics19: 119–152. Cited as reprinted in Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • Hintikka, Jaakko. 1965. “Kant's ‘New Method’ of Thought and his Theory of Mathematics.” Ajatus27: 37–47.
  • Hintikka, Jaakko. 1967. “Kant on the Mathematical Method.” The Monist51: 351–372.
  • Hintikka, Jaakko. 1974. Knowledge and the Known. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.
  • Körner, Stefan. 1968. The Philosophy of Mathematics. Reprint New York: Dover, 1986.
  • Leibniz, G. W.1969. Philosophical Papers and Letters. Translated and edited by L. Loemker.Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Leibniz, G. W.1989. Philosophical Essays. Translated and edited by R. Ariew and D. Garber.Indianapolis: Hackett.
  • Loemker, Leroy. 1966. “Leibniz's Conception of Philosophical Method.” First published in Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, Bd. 20 Heft 3-4. Cited as reprinted in Ivor LeClerc, ed., The Philosophy of Leibniz and the Modern World. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1973.
  • McRae, Robert. 1995. “The Theory of Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, edited by NicholasJolley, 176–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mittelstrass, Jürgen. 1979. “The Philosopher's Conception of Mathesis Universalis from Descartes to Leibniz.” Annals of Science36: 593–610.
  • Onof, Christian, and Dennis Schulting (transls.). 2014. “On Kästner's Treatises.” Kantian Review19: 305–313.
  • Parsons, Charles. 1969. Kant's Philosophy of Arithmetic. Cited as reprinted in Mathematics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.
  • Parsons, Charles. 2009. Mathematical Thought and its Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pimpinella, Pietro. 2001. “Cognitio intuitiva bei Wolff und Baumgarten.” In Vernunftkritik und Aufklärung, edited by M.Oberhausen, et al., 265–294. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
  • Pombo, Olga. 1987. Leibniz and the Problem of a Universal Language. Materialien zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft und der Semiotikvol. 3. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
  • Rechter, Ofra. 2006. “The View from 1763.” In Intuition and the Axiomatic Method, edited by E.Carson and R.Huber. The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Schwaiger, Clement. 2001. “Symbolische und intuitive Erkenntnis bei Leibniz, Wolff, und Baumgarten.” In Nihil sine ratione. Mensch, Natur und Technik im Wirken von G.W. Leibniz (VII. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress), edited by H.Poser. Hanover: Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft.
  • Sepper, Dennis. 2012. “Spinoza, Leibniz, and the Rationalist Reconceptions of Imagination.” In A Companion to Rationalism, edited by AlanNelon. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Shabel, Lisa. 1998. “Kant on the ‘Symbolic Construction’ of Mathematical Concepts.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science29: 589–621.
  • Shabel, Lisa. 2003. Mathematics in Kant's Critical Philosophy. New York: Routledge.
  • Shabel, Lisa. 2006. “Kant's Philosophy of Mathematics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, edited by P.Guyer, 94–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sutherland, Daniel. 2004. “Kant's Philosophy of Mathematics and the Greek Mathematical Tradition.” Philosophical Review113: 157–201.
  • Sutherland, Daniel. 2006. “Kant on Arithmetic, Algebra, and the Theory of Proportions.” Journal of the History of Philosophy44: 533–558.
  • Sutherland, Daniel. 2010. “Philosophy, Geometry, and Logic in Leibniz, Wolff, and the Early Kant.” In Discourse on a New Method, edited by M.Dickson and M.Domski, 155–192. Chicago and LaSalle: Open Court.
  • Tonelli, Giorgio. 1959. “Der Streit über die mathematische Methode in der Philosophie in der ersten Hälfte des 18.Jahrhunderts.” Archiv für Philosophie9: 37–66.
  • Ungeheuer, Gerold. 1983. “Sprache und symbolische Erkenntnis bei Wolff.” In Christian Wolff (1679–1754), edited by W. Schneiders, 9–112. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag.
  • Weir, Alan. 2011. “Formalism in the Philosophy of Mathematics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 edition), edited by E.Zalta.
  • Wolff, Christian. (1716) 1965. Mathematisches Lexicon. edited by J. E.Hoffmann. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
  • Wolff, Christian. (1737) 1981. Herrn Christian Wolffs Gesammelte kleine philosophische Schrifften, Dritter Theil. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
  • Wolff, Christian. (1738) 1968. Psychologia Empirica, edited by ÉcoleJean. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
  • Wolff, Christian. (1740) 1983. Philosophia Rationalis sive Logica, edited by ÉcoleJean. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
  • Wolff, Christian. (1742) 1968. Elementa Matheseos Universae. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
  • Wolff, Christian. (1750) 1999. Anfangsgründe aller mathematischen Wissenschaften, Erster Theil. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
  • Wolff, Christian. (1751) 1983. In Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschens, auch allen Dingen überhaupt, edited by C. A.Corr. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
  • Wolff, Christian. (1754) 1965. Vernünftige Gedanken von den Kräften des menschlichen Verstandes, edited by H. W.Arndt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
  • Wolff, Christian. 1963. Preliminary Discourse Concerning Philosophy in General, edited by R. J.Blackwell. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Zac, Sylvain. 1974. “Le prix et la mention.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale79: 473–498.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.