Spatial representation, magnitude and the two stems of cognition

References

• Allais, Lucy. 2009. “Kant, Non-Conceptual Content, and the Representation of Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy47: 383–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, Henry. 2004. Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. 2nd ed.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Lanier. 2005. “The Wolffian Paradigm and Its Discontents: Kant's Containment Definition of Analyticity in Historical Context.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie87: 22–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Lewis White. 2002. “Did the Sage of Königsberg Have No Dreams?” In Selected Essays on Kant, edited by HokeRobinson, 85–101. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, Emily. 1997. “Kant on Intuition in Geometry.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy27: 489–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Gareth. 1985. “Things Without the Mind.” In Collected Papers, edited by AntoniaPhillips, 249–290. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael. 2000. “Geometry, Construction, and Intuition in Kant and His Successors.” In Between Logic and Intuition, edited by GilaSher, and RichardTieszen, 186–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael. 2012. “Kant on Geometry and Spatial Intuition.” Synthese186: 231–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsborg, Hannah. 2006. “Kant and the Problem of Experience.” Philosophical Topics34: 59–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsborg, Hannah. 2008. “Was Kant a Nonconceptualist?” Philosophical Studies137: 65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, Aaron. 2012. “Perception and the Categories.” European Journal of Philosophy20: 193–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, Robert. 2005. “Kant and Nonconceptual Content.” European Journal of Philosophy13: 247–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, Robert. 2011. “Kant's Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and the Gap in the B Deduction.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies19: 399–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, Dieter. 1953. “Zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants” [On Kant's Theoretical Philosophy]. Philosophische Rundschau1: 124–149.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, Jaako. 1969a. “Kant on the Mathematical Method.” In Kant Studies Today, edited by LewisWhite Beck, 117–140. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, Jaako. 1969b. “On Kant's Notion of Intuition (Anschauung).” In The First Critique: Reflections on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, edited by T.Penelhum, and J. J.MacIntosh, 38–53. Belmont: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel.1902ff. Kants gesammelte Schriften. Edited by the Königlich Preußische Akademie derWissenschaften. Berlin: de Gruyter and predecessors.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited byPaulGuyer and AllenWood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Land, Thomas. 2006. “Kant's Spontaneity Thesis.” Philosophical Topics34: 189–220.
   Google Scholar
• Land, Thomas. Forthcoming. “No Other Use than in Judgment? Kant on Concepts and Sensible Synthesis.” Journal of the History of Philosophy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, John. 1998. “Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality.” Journal of Philosophy95: 431–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, John. 2009a. “Avoiding the Myth of the Given.” Chap. 14 inHaving the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, John. 2009b. “Sensory Consciousness in Kant and Sellars.” Chap. 6 inHaving the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLear, Colin. Forthcoming-a. “The Kantian (Non)-Conceptualism Debate.” Philosophy Compass.
   Google Scholar
• McLear, Colin. Forthcoming-b. “Two Kinds of Unity in the Critique of Pure Reason.” Journal of the History of Philosophy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, Charles. 1982. “Kant's Philosophy of Arithmetic.” In Kant on Pure Reason, edited by RalphWalker, 13–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pippin, Robert. 1982. Kant's Theory of Form. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rödl, Sebastian. 2012. Categories of the Temporal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohs, Peter. 2001. “Bezieht sich nach Kant die Anschauungunmittelbar auf Gegenstände?” [Does Intuition relate immediately to Objects, according to Kant?]. In Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, edited by VolkerGerhardt, Rolf-PeterHorstmann and RalphSchumacher, vol. 2, 214–228. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Schulthess, Peter. 1981. Relation und Funktion. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 1967. “Some Remarks on Kant's Theory of Experience.” Journal of Philosophy64: 633–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 1978. “The Role of Imagination in Kant's Theory of Experience.” In Categories: A Colloquium, edited by HenryJohnstone, 231–245. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 1992. “Sensibility and Understanding.” Chap. 1 inScience and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 2002. Kant and Pre-Kantian Themes: Lectures by Wilfrid Sellars, edited by PedroAmaral. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
   Google Scholar
• Shabel, Lisa. 1998. “Kant on the ‘Symbolic Construction’ of Mathematical Concepts.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science29A: 589–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabel, Lisa. 2003. Mathematics in Kant's Critical Philosophy: Reflections on Mathematical Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shabel, Lisa. 2005. “Apriority and Application: Philosophy of Mathematics in the Modern Period.” In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, edited by StewartShapiro, 29–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, Peter. 1966. The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Daniel. 2004a. “Kant's Philosophy of Mathematics and the Greek Mathematical Tradition.” Philosophical Review113: 157–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Daniel. 2004b. “The Role of Magnitude in Kant's Critical Philosophy.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy34: 411–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolley, Clinton. 2013. “The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions.” Kantian Review18: 107–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, Daniel. 1998. “Kant and the Apriority of Space.” Philosophical Review107 (2): 179–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, Michael. 1995. Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Miteinem Essay über Freges ‘Begriffsschrift’ [The Completeness of Kant's Table of Judgments. Including an Essay on Frege's ‘Begriffsschrift’]. Frankfurt a.M.Klostermann.
   Google Scholar