Kant (vs. Leibniz, Wolff and Lambert) on real definitions in geometry

References

• Adickes, Erich, ed. 1911. Kants Handschriftlicher Nachlass. Mathematik – Physik und Chemie – Physische Geographie. Volume 14 of Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, Emily. 1999. “Kant on the method of mathematics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy37: 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, Emily. 2006. “Locke and Kant on mathematical knowledge.” In Intuition and the Axiomatic Method, edited by EmilyCarson and RenateHuber, 3–21. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Risi, Vincenzo. 2007. Geometry and Monadology. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, Katherine. 2009. “Why Euclid's Geometry Brooked No Doubt: J.H. Lambert on Certainty and the Existence of Models.” Synthese167: 33–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, Katherine. 2012. “Kant and Strawson on the Content of Geometrical Concepts.” Noûs46: 86–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euclid. 1925. The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, Translated from the Text of Heiberg, with Introduction and Commentary. 2nd ed. Translated and edited by Sir Thomas Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, Gideon. 2006. “Definition and Construction: Maimon's Philosophy of Geometry.” . Preprint 317 of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin. http://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/Preprints/P317.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Michael. 2010. “Synthetic History Reconsidered.” In Discourse on a New Method, edited by MichaelDickson and MaryDomski, 571–813. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Heis, Jeremy. Forthcoming. “Kant on Parallel Lines: Definitions, Postulates, and Axioms.” In Kant's Philosophy of Mathematics: Modern Essays. Vol. 1: The Critical Philosophy and Its Background, edited by OfraRechter and CarlPosy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hintikka, Hans. 1969. “On Kant's Notion of Intuition (Anschauung).” In The First Critique, edited by T.Penelhum and J.J.Macintosh, 38–53. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1902. Gesammelte Schriften. Edited by the Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaft.29 vols. Berlin: DeGruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1967. Philosophical Correspondence, 1759–99. Edited and translated by Arnulf Zweig.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Lectures on Logic. Translated and edited by J. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 2002. “On a Discovery Whereby Any New Critique of Pure Reason is to be Made Superfluous by an Earlier One.” In Theoretical Philosophy After 1781. Translated by Henry Allison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 2004. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Translated and edited by Michael Friedman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1764. Neues Organon. Band I. Leipzig: Wendler. Partially translated by Eric Watkins in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: CUP, 2009, 257-274.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1771. Anlage zur Architectonic. Vol.1. Riga: Hartknock.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1895a. “Letter to Holland.” In Die Theorie der Parallellinien von Euklid bis auf Gauss, edited by FriedrichEngel and PaulStäckel, 141–142. Leipzig: Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1895b. “Theorie der Parallellinien.” In Die Theorie der Parallellinien von Euklid bis auf Gauss, edited by FriedrichEngel and PaulStäckel, 152–207. Leipzig: Teubner. Partially translated by William Ewald in From Kant to Hilbert. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 158–167.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1915. “Abhandlung vom Criterium Veritatis.” Kant-Studien. Ergänzungsheft36: 7–64. Partially translated by Erick Watkins in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials (Cambridge: CUP, 2009), 233–257.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1918. “Über die Methode, die Metaphysik, Theologie und Moral richtiger zu beweisen.” Kant-Studien. Ergänzungsheft42: 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Laywine, Alison. 1998. “Problems and Postulates: Kant on Reason and Understanding.” Journal of the History of Philosophy36: 279–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laywine, Allison. 2001. “Kant in Reply to Lambert on the Ancestry of Metaphysical Concepts.” Kantian Review5: 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Laywine, Alison. 2010. “Kant and Lambert on Geometrical Postulates in the Reform of Metaphysics.” In Discourse on a New Method, edited by MichaelDickson and MaryDomski, 113–133. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1858. “In Euclidis πρ;ˆτα.” In Leibnizens mathematischen Schriften, edited by C. I.Gerhardt. Vol. V, 183–211. Halle: Schmidt.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1970. Philosophical Papers and Letters. 2nd ed.. Translated by L.E. Loemker. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1989. Philosophical Essays. Translated and edited by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1996. New Essays on Human Understanding. Edited and translated by Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saccheri, Girolamo. 1920. Euclides Vindicatus. Translated by Bruce Halsted. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Johann. 1784. Entdeckte Theorie der Parallelen. Königsberg: Kanter.
   Google Scholar
• Shabel, Lisa. 2003. Mathematics in Kant's Critical Philosophy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Daniel. 2005. “Kant on Fundamental Geometrical Relations.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie87: 117–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Daniel. 2010. “Philosophy, Geometry, and Logic in Leibniz, Wolff, and the Early Kant.” In Discourse on a New Method, edited by MichaelDickson and MaryDomski, 155–192. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Judson. 2006. “Hintikka on Aristotelean Cosntructions, Kantian Intuitions, and Peircean Theorems.” In The Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka, edited by Auxier and Hahn, 195–265. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Christian. 1710. Der Anfangs-Gründe aller mathematischen Wissenschaften. Halle. Reprinted in Wolff, 1962, Gesammelte Werke, I.12.Hildesheim: Olms.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Christian. 1716. Mathematisches Lexicon. Leipzig. Reprinted in Wolff, 1962, Gesammelte Werke, I.11.Hildesheim: Olms.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Christian. 1740. Philosophia Rationalis sive Logica. Frankfurt and Leipzig. Reprinted in Wolff, 1962, Gesammelte Werke, II.1. Hildesheim: Olms. Partially translated by Richard Blackwell as Preliminary Discourse on Philosophy in General. New York: Merrill, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Christian. 1741. Elementa Matheseos Universae. Halle. Reprinted in Wolff, 1962, Gesammelte Werke, II.29.Hildesheim: Olms.
   Google Scholar