References
- Arntzenius, Frank. 2003. “Some Problems for Conditionalization and Reflection.” The Journal of Philosophy 100 (7): 356–370.
- Berker, Selim. 2013. ”The Rejection of Epistemic Consequentialism.” Philosophical Issues 23 (1): 363–387.
- Briggs, Rachael. ( manuscript) ”An Accuracy-dominance Argument for Conditionalization.”
- Carr, Jennifer. ( manuscript) ”How to Expect When You’re Expecting.”
- Christensen, David. 2000. “Diachronic Coherence versus Epistemic Impartiality.” Philosophical Review 109 (3): 349–371.
- Friedman, Jane. ( manuscript) ”Inquiry and Belief.”
- Greaves, Hilary, and David Wallace. 2006. “Justifying Conditionalization: Conditionalization Maximizes Expected Epistemic Utility.” Mind 115 (459): 607–632.
- Harman, Gilbert. 1986. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Hedden, Brian. 2013. “Options and Diachronic Tragedy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (1): 423–451.
- Hedden, Brian. 2015. “Time-slice Rationality.” Mind 124 (494): 449–491.
- James, William. 1896. ”The Sentiment of Rationality”. In The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, 63–110. Norwood, MA: Synthèse.
- Joyce, James. 1998. “A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism.” Philosophy of Science 65 (4): 575–603.
- Joyce, James, Franz, Huber and Christoph, Schmidt-Petri, eds. 2009. ”Accuracy and coherence: Prospects for an alethic epistemology of partial belief”. Vol. 342, In Degrees of Belief, New York: Synthese, Springer, 263–297.
- Kolodny, Niko , and John MacFarlane. 2010. ”Ifs and Oughts.” The Journal of Philosophy 107 (3): 115–143.
- Leitgeb, Hannes, and Richard Pettigrew. 2010. “An Objective Justification of Bayesianism: The Consequences of Minimizing Inaccuracy.” Philosophy of Science 77 (2): 236–272.
- McGrath, Matthew. 2007. “Memory and Epistemic Conservatism.” Synthese 157 (1): 1–24.
- Meacham, Chris. ( Forthcoming) ”Understanding Conditionalization.” Vol. I.
- Meacham, Christopher J.G., Tamar Szabo, Gendler, John, Hawthorne, eds. 2010. ”Unravelling the tangled web: Continuity, internalism, non-uniqueness and self-locating beliefs”. Vol. 3, In Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 86–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Moss, Sarah. 2014. “Credal Dilemmas.” Noûs 48 (3): 665–683.
- Rosenkrantz, R. 1981. Foundations and Applications of Inductive Probability, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Press.
- Schwarz, Wolfgang. 2012. Worms first! in defence of diachronic rationality, Wollongong: Unpublished AAP talk
- Talbott, W. J. 1991. “Two Principles of Bayesian Epistemology.” Philosophical Studies 62 (2): 135–150.
- Titelbaum, Michael. 2006. ”Comments on greaves & wallace”. In Pacific APA,
- Robert, J. and G. Williams. ( manuscript) ”A Nonpragmatic Dominance Argument for Conditionalization.”
- Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112444/Skyscraper-humanities.png"})