References
- Arpaly, N. 2000. “On Acting Rationally Against One’s Best Judgment.” Ethics 110: 488–513.
- Ballantyne, N., and E. Coffman. 2012. “Conciliationism and Uniqueness.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90: 657–670.
- Bratman, M. E. 2010. “Agency, Time, and Sociality.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 84: 7–26.
- Bratman, M. E. 2012. “Time, Rationality, and Self-governance.” Philosophical Issues 22: 73–88.
- Broome, J. 2013. Rationality through Reasoning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
- Brown, P. M. 1976. “Conditionalization and Expected Utility.” Philosophy of Science 43: 415–419.
- Feldman, R. 2007. “Reasonable Religious Disagreements.” In Philosophers without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life, edited by L. M. Antony, 194–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ferrero, L. 2012. “Diachronic Constraints of Practical Rationality.” Philosophical Issues 22: 144-164.
- Greaves, H., and D. Wallace. 2006. “Justifying Conditionalization: Conditionalization Maximizes Expected Epistemic Utility.” Mind 115: 607–632.
- Hedden, B. 2015. “Time-slice Rationality.” Mind 124: 449–491.
- Holton, R. 2008. Willing, Wanting, Waiting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kelly, T. 2014. “Evidence may be Permissive”. In Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, edited by M. Steup, J. Turri, and E. Sosa, 298–311. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Kelly, T. (Forthcoming). “Historical versus Current Time Slice Theories of Epistemic Justification”. In Goldman and His Critics, edited by H. Kornblith and B. McLaughlin. Blackwell.
- Kopec, M. 2015. “A Counterexample to the Uniqueness Thesis.” Philosophia 43: 403–409.
- Kopec, M. (Forthcoming). “A Pluralistic account of Epistemic Rationality.” Unpublished manuscript.
- Korsgaard, C. M. 2009. Self-constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Meacham, C. J. G. 2014. “Impermissive Bayesianism.” Erkenntnis 79: 1185–1217.
- Moss, S. 2015. “Time-slice Epistemology and Action Under Indeterminacy”. In Oxford Studies in Epistemology, edited by T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne, Vol. 5, 172–194. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Paul, S. K. 2015. “Doxastic Self-control.” American Philosophical Quarterly 52: 145–158.
- Schoenfield, M. 2014. “Permission to Believe: Why Permissivism is True and What it Tells us About Irrelevant Influences on Belief.” Noûs 48: 193–218.
- Schroeder, M. 2007. Slaves of the Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Teller, P. 1973. “Conditionalization and Observation.” Synthese 26: 218–258.
- Titelbaum, M. G. 2010. “Not Enough There There: Evidence, Reasons, and Language Independence.” Philosophical Perspectives 24: 477–528.
- Titelbaum, M. G. 2013. Quitting Certainties: A Bayesian Framework Modeling Degrees of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Titelbaum, M. G., and M. Kopec. (Forthcoming). “Plausible Permissivism.” Unpublished manuscript.
- White, R. 2005. “Epistemic Permissiveness.” Philosophical Perspectives 19: 445–459.
- Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112447/MPU-L1HU.png"})