The problem of empty names and Russellian Plenitude

References

• Adams, Fred, Gary Fuller, and Robert Stecker. 1992. “The Semantics of Thought.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73: 375–389.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, Fred, Gary Fuller, and Robert Stecker. 1997. “The Semantics of Fictional Names.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78: 128–148.10.1111/papq.1997.78.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, Fred, and Robert Stecker. 1994. “Vacuous Singular Terms.” Mind and Language 9: 387–401.10.1111/mila.1994.9.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, David. 1993. “Empty Names.” Noûs 27: 449–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, David. 2005. “Empty Names, Fictional Names, Mythical Names.” Noûs 39: 596–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breckenridge, Wylie, and Ofra Magidor. 2012. “Arbitrary Reference.” Philosophical Studies 158: 377–400.10.1007/s11098-010-9676-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, Stuart. 2004. “The Ubiquitous Problem of Empty Names.” Journal of Philosophy 101: 277–298.10.5840/jphil2004101618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, Gregory. 1990. The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511897498
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, Keith. 1974. “Speaking of Nothing.” The Philosophical Review 83: 3–31.10.2307/2183871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, Anthony. 2003. “Empty Names and ‘Gappy’ Propositions.” Philosophical Studies 116: 1–36.10.1023/B:PHIL.0000005533.25543.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frege, Gottlob. 1892/1980. “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50. Translated as “On Sense and Reference” by M. Black in Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. 3rd ed., edited and translated by P. Geach, M. Black. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, Stacie. 2007. “Fictional Characters.” Philosophy Compass 2: 141–156.10.1111/phco.2007.2.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, Peter. 2014. “What Are the Primary Bearers of Truth?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43: 558–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks, Peter. 2015. Propositional Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684892.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, David. 1989. “Demonstratives.” In Themes from Kaplan, edited by J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein, 481–564. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korman, Daniel Z. 2006. “What Externalists Should Say About Dry Earth.” Journal of Philosophy 103: 503–520.10.5840/jphil20061031030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kripke, Saul. 2011. “Vacuous Names and Fictional Entities.” In Philosophical Troubles, 52–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kripke, Saul. 2013. Reference and Existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928385.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1978. “Truth in Fiction.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 37–46. Reprinted in Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1, 261–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1991. Parts of Classes. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ludlow, Peter. 2003. “Externalism, Logical Form, and Linguistic Intentions.” In The Epistemology of Language, edited by Alex Barber, 399–414. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Markosian, Ned. 2004. “A Defense of Presentism.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Vol. 1, edited by Dean Zimmerman, 47–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavian, Seyed N. 2011. “Gappy Propositions?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41: 125–157.10.1353/cjp.2011.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, Nathan. 1987. “The Fact that x=y.” Philosophia 17: 517–518.10.1007/BF02381070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, Nathan. 1998. “Nonexistence.” Noûs 32: 277–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soames, Scott. 2012. What is Meaning? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, Roy. 1988. Blindspots. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, Roy. 2001. Vagueness and Contradiction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, Joshua. 2014. “Unnecessary Existents.” The Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43: 766–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Kenneth. 2000. “Emptiness without Compromise.” In Empty Names, Fiction, and the Puzzles of Non-Existence, edited by A. Everett and T. Hofweber, 17–36. Stanford: CSLI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, Amie L. 1999. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tillman, Chris, and Greg Fowler. 2012. “Propositions and Parthood: The Universe and Anti-symmetry.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90: 525–539.10.1080/00048402.2011.611812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Inwagen, Peter. 1979. “Creatures of Fiction.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14: 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Inwagen, Peter. 1983. “Fiction and Metaphysics.” Philosophy and Literature 7: 67–77.10.1353/phl.1983.0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Inwagen, Peter. 2000. “Quantification and Fictional Discourse.” In Empty Names, Fiction and the Puzzles of Non-existence, edited by A. Everett and T. Hofeber, 235–247. Stanford: CSLI Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Inwagen, Peter. 2001. “Existence, Ontological Commitment, and Fictional Entities.” In The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, edited by M. Loux and D. Zimmerman, 131–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Timothy. 1994. Vagueness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar