Expressivism, meaning, and all that

References

• Baker, Derek, and Jack Woods. 2015. “How Expressivists Can and Should Explain Inconsistency.” Ethics 125: 391–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, Simon. 1993. “Attitudes and Contents.” In Essays in Quasi-Realism, edited by Simon Blackburn, 182–197. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, Simon. 1998. Ruling Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Block, Ned. 1986. “Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10: 615–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charlow, Nate. 2014. “The Problem with the Frege–Geach Problem.” Philosophical Studies 167 (3): 635–665. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0119-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlow, Nate. 2015. “Prospects for an Expressivist Theory of Meaning.” Philosophers’ Imprint 15 (23): 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisman, Matthew. 2016. The Meaning of “Ought”: Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Donald. 1990. “The Structure and Content of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 87 (6): 279–328.10.2307/2026863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, Hartry. 1978. “Mental representation.” Erkenntnis 13 (1): 9–61. doi:10.1007/BF00160888.
   Google Scholar
• Field, Hartry. 1994. “Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content.” Mind 103 (411): 249–285.10.1093/mind/103.411.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, Hartry. 2001. “Attributions of Meaning and Content.” In Truth and the Absence of Fact, edited by Hartry Field, 157–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199242895.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan. 2003. Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, Dorothy L., Joseph L. Camp, and Nuel D. Belnap. 1975. “A Prosentential Theory of Truth.” Philosophical Studies 27 (2): 73–125. doi:10.1007/BF01209340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, Gilbert. 1999. “(Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics.” In Reasoning, Meaning, and Mind, edited by Gilbert Harman, 207–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198238029.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Horgan, Terence, and Mark Timmons. 2006. “Cognitivist Expressivism.” In Metaethics after Moore, edited by Terry Horgan and Mark Timmons, 255–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199269914.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Horwich, Paul. 1998a. Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019823824X.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Horwich, Paul. 1998b. Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198752237.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, Sebastian. 2017. “Expressivism, Belief, And All That.” The Journal of Philosophy 114 (4): 189–207.10.5840/jphil2017114416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Huw. 1988. Facts and the Function of Truth. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Huw. 2013. Expressivism, Pragmatism and Representationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511842498
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, Frank. 1927. “Facts and Propositions.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 7 (1): 153–206.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/7.1.153
   Google Scholar
• Ridge, Michael. 2014. Impassioned Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682669.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Gideon. 1998. “Blackburn’s Essays in Quasi-Realism.” Noûs 32: 386–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffer, Stephen. 1996. “Language-Created, Language-Independent Entities.” Philosophical Topics 24 (1): 149–167.10.5840/philtopics199624117
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, Stephen. 2003. The Things We Mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199257760.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Mark. 2008. Being For: Evaluating the Semantic Program of Expressivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534654.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Mark. 2010. Noncognitivism in Ethics. New York: Rougtledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Mark. 2013. “Two Roles for Propositions: Cause for Divorce?” Noûs 47: 409–430. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2011.00833.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 1954. “Some Reflections on Language Games.” Philosophy of Science 21 (3): 204–228.10.1086/287344
   Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 1969. “Language as Thought and as Communication.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29: 417–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellars, Wilfrid. 1974. “Meaning as Functional Classifications.” Synthese 27: 417–437.
   Google Scholar
• Silk, Alex. 2013. “Truth Conditions and the Meanings of Ethical Terms.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, Vol. 8, 195–222. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wedgwood, Ralph. 2008. The Nature of Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Michael. 1999. “Meaning and Deflationary Truth.” Journal of Philosophy 96: 545–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar