9,495
Views
241
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Examining Productive Failure, Productive Success, Unproductive Failure, and Unproductive Success in Learning

REFERENCES

  • Albanese, M., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of the literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81.
  • Bassok, M. (1996). Using content to interpret structure: Effects on analogical transfer. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(2), 54–58.
  • Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2012). Motivation and transfer: The role of mastery-approach goals in preparation for future learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 399–432.
  • Belenky, D. M., & Schalk, L. (2014). The effects of idealized and grounded materials on learning, transfer, and interest: An organizing framework for categorizing external knowledge representations. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 27–50.
  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age: Design-centered models of teaching and instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 695–713). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. H., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120, 322–330.
  • Braithwaite, D. W., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015). Effects of variation and prior knowledge on abstract concept learning. Cognition and Instruction, 33, 226–256.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What's so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22, 61–79.
  • Carroll, W. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 360–367.
  • Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.
  • Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Clifford, M. M. (1984). Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure. Educational Psychologist, 19, 108–120.
  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291–315.
  • Dean, D., & Kuhn, D. (2006). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education, 91, 384–397.
  • DeCaro, M. S., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). Exploring mathematics problems prepares children to learn from instruction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 552–568.
  • De Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
  • Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Nagarajan, A., Chernobilsky, E., & Beitzel, B. (2006). Cognitive transfer revisited: Can we exploit new media to solve old problems on a large scale? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 145–162.
  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.
  • Gagne, R. M., & Brown, L. T. (1961). Some factors in the programming of conceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 313–321.
  • Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Eds.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Hmelo, C. E. (1998). Problem-based learning: Effects on the early acquisition of cognitive skill in medicine. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 173–236.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.
  • Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P. A., Sweller, J. & Tuovinen, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 579–588.
  • Kalyuga, S., & Singh, A. M. (2015). Rethinking the boundaries of cognitive load theory in complex learning. Educational Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9352-0
  • Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 320(5875), 454–455.
  • Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2013). The cost of concreteness: The effect of nonessential information on analogical transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19(1), 14–29.
  • Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424.
  • Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38, 523–550.
  • Kapur, M. (2011). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39, 561–579.
  • Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40, 651–672.
  • Kapur, M. (2013). Comparing learning from productive failure and vicarious failure. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 651–677. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.819000
  • Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38, 1008–1022.
  • Kapur, M. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51–65.
  • Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2011). Classroom-based experiments in productive failure. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2812–2817). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83.
  • Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning and problem solving. Instructional Science, 40, 645–650.
  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.
  • Kittel, J. E. (1957). An experimental study of the effect of external direction during learning on transfer and retention of principles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 391–405.
  • Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661–667.
  • Kuhn, D. (2007). Is direct instruction the answer to the right question? Educational Psychologist, 42, 109–114.
  • Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2005). Is developing scientific thinking all about learning to control variables? Psychological Science, 16, 866–870.
  • Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2013). The impact of guidance during problem-solving prior to instruction on students’ inventions and learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 42, 305–326.
  • Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). Knowing what you don't know makes failure productive. Learning and Instruction, 34, 74–85.
  • Mayer, R. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
  • Mergendoller, J. R., Maxwell, N. L., & Bellisimo, Y. (2006). The effectiveness of problem-based instruction: A comparative study of instructional method and student characteristics. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem based Learning, 1, 49–69.
  • Miller, G., & Gildea, P. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American, 257, 94–99.
  • Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning from performance errors. Psychological Review, 103, 241–262.
  • Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for achieving transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.
  • Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423–451.
  • Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.
  • Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 185–217.
  • Roll, I., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. (2011). Outcomes and mechanisms of transfer in invention Activities. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2824–2829). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 92, 91–97.
  • Schmidt, H. G., van der Molen, H. T., te Winkel, W. W. R., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2009). Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: A meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school. Educational Psychologist, 44, 227–249.
  • Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217.
  • Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–522.
  • Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Oppezzo, M. A., & Chin, D. B. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 759–775.
  • Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 129–184.
  • Siegler, R. S. (1994). Cognitive variability: A key to understanding cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 3, 1–5.
  • Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44–58.
  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
  • Sweller, J. (2009). What human cognitive architecture tells us about constructivism. In S. Tobias and T.M. Duffy (Eds.)., Constructivist theory applied to instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 127–143). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
  • Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 351–362.
  • Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Tuovinen, J. E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 334–341.
  • Vernon, D. T. A., & Blake, R. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550–563.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Westermann, K., & Rummel, N. (2012). Delaying instruction—evidence from a study in a university relearning setting. Instructional Science, 40, 673–689.
  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.