Seven Affordances of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: How to Support Collaborative Learning? How Can Technologies Help?

REFERENCES

• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, E. (1978). The Jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ashman, A. F., & Gillies, R. M. (2013). Collaborative learning for diverse learners. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. M. O'Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 297–313). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Azmitia, M., & Montgomery, R. (1993). Friendship, transactive dialogues, and the development of scientific reasoning. Social Development, 2, 202–221.
   Google Scholar
• Baghaei, N., Mitrovic, A., & Irwin, W. (2007). Supporting collaborative learning and problem-solving in a constraint-based CSCL environment for UML class diagrams. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 159–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., Andriessen, J., Lund, K., van Amelsvoort, M., & Quignard, M. (2007). Rainbow: A framework for analyzing computer-mediated pedagogical debates. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 315–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R., & Siemens, G. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 253–272). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Leaning Sciences, 12, 307–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholome, T., Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 623–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielaczyc, K. (2013). Informing design research: Learning from teachers’ design of social infrastructures. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 258–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 368–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyajian, T. S., LaCourse, D. M., Rappaport, S. A., Fabrycky, D., Fischer, D. A., Gandolfi, D., & Jek, K. J. (2015). Planet Hunters X. KIC 8462852 - Where's the Flux? ArXiv E-Prints, 000(October). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03622
   Google Scholar
• Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (2008). Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F.-K. (2014). A case study of augmented reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capdeferro, N., & Romero, M. (2012). Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences?. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 26–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. K. (2013). Collaborative knowledge building: Toward a knowledge creation perspective. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. M. O'Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 437–461). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M. G. (2008). Communication, coordination, and camaraderie in World of Warcraft. Games and Culture, 4(1), 47–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Looi, C.-K., & Tan, S. (2010). What do students do in a F2F CSCL classroom? The optimization of multiple communications modes. Computers and Education, 55, 1159–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester, A., & Gwynne, G. (1998). Online teaching: Encouraging collaboration through anonymity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4, 0. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00096.x
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49, 219–243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers and Education, 48, 409–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (2016). A brief history of mass collaboration: How innovations over time have enabled people to work together more effectively. In Mass collaboration and education (pp. 31–42). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. C., & Hilchey, K. G. (2011). A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 176, 273–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, U., Barquero, B., Schwan, S., & Hesse, F. W. (2007). Improving quality and quantity of contributions: Two models for promoting knowledge exchange with shared databases. Computers and Education, 49, 423–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., & Jeong, H. (Eds.). (2016). Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, E. (2006). Students’ construction of external representations in design-based learning situations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Nagarajan, A., Chernobilsky, E., & Beitzel, B. D. (2006). Cognitive transfer revisited: Can we exploit new media to solve old problems on a large scale?. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. New York: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open University Nederland.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced Learning (pp. 3–19). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2014). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice: Participation support structures for newcomers in faculty student councils. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 216–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, M. (2016). Stigmergic collaboration: A framework for understanding and designing mass collaboration. In Mass collaboration and education (pp. 65–84). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2011). Fostering sharing of unshared knowledge by having access to the collaborators’ meta-knowledge structures. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2078–2087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., & Hoadley, C. M. (2006). From dialogue to monologue and back: Middle spaces in computer-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 413–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcão, T. P., & Price, S. (2011). Interfering and resolving: How tabletop interaction facilitates co-construction of argumentative knowledge. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 539–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Kafai, Y. B., & Giang, M. T. (2016). Coding by choice: A transitional analysis of social participation patterns and programming contributions in the online Scratch community. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (pp. 209–240). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From Wikipedia to the classroom: Exploring online publication and learning. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2009). Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 40(1), 19–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman-Segall, R., & Maxwell, J. (2002). Computers, the Internet, and new media for learning. In Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (pp. 393–427). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identiy formation in online social networks. Learning Media and Technology, 34, 119–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 437–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K. (2013). Sociocultural perspectives on collaborative learning: Toward collaborative knowledge creation. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. M. O'Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 57–73). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halatchliyski, I., Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia's knowledge base. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(1), 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, C., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Learning by foraging: The impact of individual knowledge and social tags on web navigation processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, J. (2001). Beyond threaded discourse. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7, 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo, C. E., Nagarajan, A., & Day, R. S. (2000). Effects of high and low prior knowledge on construction of a joint problem space. The Journal of Experimental Education, 69(1), 36–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 48–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Pschologist, 42, 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Liu, L., Gray, S., & Jordan, R. (2015). Using representational tools to learn about complex systems: A tale of two classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 1–35
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Nagarajan, A., & Derry, S. J. (2006). From face-to-face to online participation: tensions in facilitating problem-based learning. In M. Savin-Baden & K. Wilkie (Eds.), Problem-based learning online (pp. 61–78). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D. (1997). Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning. Instructional Science, 25, 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle school learners’ science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 323–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., & Sharples, M. (2007). A study of multimedia annotation of Web-based materials. Computers and Education, 48, 680–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, N. Ã., & Mcfarlane, A. (2005). Conferences as learning communities: Some early lessons in using “back-channel” technologies at an academic conference - distributed intelligence or divided attention?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 317–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Visualization of agreement and discussion processes during computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1105–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., Tattersall, C., Waterink, W., van den Berg, B., van Es, R., Bolman, C., & Koper, R. (2007). Self-organising navigational support in lifelong learning: How predecessors can lead the way. Computers and Education, 49, 781–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H. (2013). Development of group understanding via the construction of physical and technological artifacts. In D. D. Suthers, K. Lund, C. Rose, C. Teplovs, & N. Law (Eds.), Productive multivocality in the analysis of group interactions (pp. 331–351). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., & Chi, M. H. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35, 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2010). Productive use of learning resources in an online problem-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2012). Technology Supports in CSCL. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reinmann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012)—Volume 1, Full papers (pp. 339–346). Sydney, Australia: Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Group mirrors to support interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving. Computers and Education, 51(1), 279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2006). Synchronous and asynchronous text-based CMC in educational contexts: A review of recent research. TechTrends, 50(4), 46–53.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, R., Gray, S., Sorenson, A., Newman, G., Mellor, D., Hmelo-Silver, C., & Crall, A. (in press). Studying citizen science, Adaptive management, and learning feedback as a mechanism for improving conservation. Conservation Biology.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Peppler, K. A. (2011). Beyond small groups: New opportunities for research in Computer-Supported Collective Learning. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds)., Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: CSCL2011 Conference Proceeding Volume I—Long papers (pp. 17–24). Hong Kong, China: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Kali, Y. (2006). Collaborative knowledge building using the Design Principles Database. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 403–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2013). Toward a framework for CSCL research. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 211–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L., Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Puntambekar, S. (1998). Learning by design from theory to practice. In ICLS’98. Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T., & LeBaron, C. D. (2003). Reconsidering common ground: Examining Clark's contribution theory in the OR. In K. Kuutti, E. Karsten, G. Fitzpatrick, P. Dourish, & K. Schmidt (Eds.), ECSCW 2003: Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 81–98). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lajoie, S., & Lu, J. (2012). Supporting collaboration with technology: Does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine?. Metacognition Learning, 7, 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-J. (2005). VisSearch: A collaborative Web searching environment. Computers and Education, 44, 423–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty's brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18, 181–208.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H. (1999). Computer-supported collaborative learning: A review. Retrieved from http://www.kas.utu.?/clnet/clnetreport.html.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C.-C., & Kao, L.-C. (2007). Do handheld devices facilitate face-to-face collaboration? Handheld devices with large shared display groupware to facilitate group interactions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2010). Community-based individual knowledge construction in the classroom: a process-orientation account. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 202–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., & Littlejohn, A. (2008). Repositories and communities at cross-purposes: Issues in sharing and reuse of digital learning resources. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 333–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matusov, E. (1996). Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(1), 25–45.
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier, J., & Frederiksen, C. H. (2007). Individual differences in graduate students ’ help-seeking process in using a computer coach in problem-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 184–203.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, N., & Okita, S. Y. (2012). Robot facilitation as dynamic support for collaborative learning. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds), The future of learning: Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences—Volume 1, Full papers (pp. 57–63). Sydney, Australia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Morken, E. M., Divitini, M., & Haugaløkken, O. K. (2007). Enriching spaces in practice-based education to support collaboration while mobile: The case of teacher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 300–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskaliuk, J., Bertram, J., & Cress, U. (2013). Training in virtual environments: Putting theory into practice. Ergonomics, 56, 195–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interations, 6(3), 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers and Education, 61, 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, A. M., & O'Kelly, J. (1994). Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 321–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeberst, A., Halatchliyski, I., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Knowledge construction in Wikipedia: A systemic-constructivist analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, J. E. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: War stories and community memory among service technicians. In D. S. Middelton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering: Memory in society (pp. 169–181). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Overdijk, M., & Diggelen, W. (2008). Appropriation of a shared workspace: Organizing principles and their application. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 165–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
   Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psychology, 12, 378–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persico, D., Pozzi, F., & Sarti, L. (2010). Monitoring collaborative activities in computer supported collaborative learning. Distance Education, 31(1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, V., & Slotta, J. D. (2010). Scaffolding knowledge communities in the classroom: New opportunities in the web 2.0 era. In M. J. Jacobson & P. Reinmann (Eds.), Designs for learning environments of the future: International perspectives from the learning sciences (pp. 205–232). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pifarré, M., & Staarman, J. K. (2011). Wiki-supported collaborative learning in primary education: How a dialogic space is created for thinking together. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 187–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recker, M. M., Walker, A., & Lawless, K. (2003). What do you recommend? Implementation and analyses of collaborative information filtering of web resources for education. Instructional Science, 31, 299–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernandez, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 679–744). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J. (2013). Special issue on CSCL: Discussion. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 67–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 201–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saab, N. (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salinas, M. F. (2008). From Dewey to Gates: A model to integrate psychoeducational principles in the selection and use of instructional technology. Computers and Education, 50, 652–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 18–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmiento, J. W., & Stahl, G. (2008). Group creativity in interaction: Collaborative referencing, remembering, and bridging. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24, 492–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Peru, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In L. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 397–417). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., Passant, A., & Breslin, J. G. (2011). Understanding and improving Wikipedia article discussion spaces. Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing - SAC ’11, 808.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, R. B. (2016). Toward participatory discovery networks: A critique of current mass collaboration environments and a possible learning-rich future. In Mass collaboration and education (pp. 187–207). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, S., Rogat, T. K., Adams-Wiggins, K. R., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2015). Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 273–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1992). When and why does cooperative learning increase achievement? Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 145–173). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2005). Explaining behavior through observational investigation and theory articulation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 315–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, H., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staarman, J. K., Krol, K., & Van Der Meijden, H. (2005). Peer interaction in three collaborative learning environments. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(1), 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. D. (2014). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 479–500). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 421–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthers, D. D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 315–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 183–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthers, D. D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S., & Dwyer, N. (2008). Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments. Computers and Education, 50, 1103–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. L. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 229–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• van Aalst, J. (2009). Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 259–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Joolingen, W. R., de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 671–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicari, R., Flores, C. D., Seixas, L., Gluz, J. C., & Coelho, H. (2008). AMPLIA: A probabilistic learning environment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18, 347–373.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Adaptive support for CSCL: Is it feedback relevance or increased student accountability that matters? In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: CSCL2011 Conference Proceeding Volume I—Long papers (pp. 334–341). Hong Kong, China: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (2013). Information processing approaches to collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. M. O'Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 19–40). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, T. (2006). Code talk: Student discourse and participation with networked handhelds. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 359–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. C., & Huang, L. (2007). Computer-mediated critical doing history project. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2144–2162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. J. H., Zhang, J., Su, A. Y. S., & Tsa, J. J. P. (2011). A collaborative multimedia annotation tool for enhancing knowledge sharing in CSCL. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(1), 45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 262–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Leaning Sciences, 18, 7–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar