840
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Explaining the Significance of Participationist Approaches for Understanding Students' Knowledge Acquisition

REFERENCES

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 84, 261–271.
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260–267.
  • Azevedo, F. S. (2013). The tailored practice of hobbies and its implication for the design of interest-driven learning environments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 462–510.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34, 87–98.
  • Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Deci, E. E. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382–393.
  • Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am i and what am i going to do with my life? personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89.
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
  • Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black students' school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting white’.” The Urban Review, 18, 176–206.
  • Greeno, J. G., & Gresalfi, M. S. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Greeno, J. G., & the Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group (TMSMTAPG). (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.
  • Greeno, J. G., & van de Sande, C. (2007). Perspectival understanding of conceptions and conceptual growth in interaction. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 9–23.
  • Gresalfi, M. S. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 327–369.
  • Hand, V. M. (2010). The co-construction of opposition in a low-track mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 97–132.
  • Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 51–67.
  • Hansen, K. G. (2000). Situeret læring i klasserummet [Situated learning in the classroom]. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Tekster om læring (pp. 206–223). Frederiksberg, Denmark: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
  • Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571.
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
  • Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls' interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners. Learning and Instruction, 12, 447–465.
  • Hoffmann, L., & Häussler, P. (1996, June). An intervention project promoting girls' and boys' interest in physics. Paper presented at the Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender, Kiel, Germany.
  • Hogg, M. A. (2012). Social identity and the psychology of groups. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 502–519). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Holland, D., Lachicotte Jr, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (1996). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 15–34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
  • Kasworm, C. (2005). Adult student identity in an intergenerational community college classroom. Adult Education Quarterly, 56(1), 3–20.
  • Kessels, U. (2005). Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 309–323.
  • Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409.
  • Krapp, A. (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381–395.
  • La Guardia, J. G. (2009). Developing who i am: A self-determination theory approach to the establishment of healthy identities. Educational Psychologist, 44, 90–104.
  • Lave, J. (1997). Learning, apprenticeship, social practice. Nordisk Pedagogik, 17(3), 140–151.
  • Lave, J., & Packer, M. (2008). Towards a social ontology of learning. In K. Nielsen, S. Brinkmann, C. Elmholdt, L. Tanggaard, P. Musaeus, & G. Kraft (Eds.), A qualitative stance (pp. 17–46). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
  • Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviaet psychology. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Levin, J. R., & Pressley, M. (1983). Cognitive strategy research: Psychological foundations. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.
  • McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., & Lin, Y.-G. (1985). Teaching learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 20, 153–160.
  • Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.
  • Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.
  • Morf, C. C., & Mischel, W. (2012). The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: Toward a converging science of selfhood. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self, and identity (pp. 21–49). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Nielsen, K., & Kvale, S. (2006). The workplace—A landscape of learning. In E. Antonacopoulou, P. Jarvis, V. Andersen, B. Elkjær, & S. H. Pedersen (Eds.), Learning, working and living (pp. 119–135). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Mestre, J. P. (2013). Toward a model of transfer as sense-making. Educational Psychologist, 48, 184–207.
  • Nolen, S. B. (2007). Young children's motivation to read and write: Development in social contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 219–270.
  • Ogbu, J. U. (1987). Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search of an explanation. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 18, 312–334.
  • Oyserman, D., Elmore, K., & Smith, G. (2012). Self, self-concept, and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 69–104). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Packer, M. J. (2001). The problem of transfer, and the sociocultural critique of schooling. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 493–514.
  • Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227–241.
  • Postareff, L. (2010, June). How do teachers' self-reports of their teaching correspond with their teaching practices? Paper presented at the International Consortium for Educational Development, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Renninger, K. A. (2009). Interest and Identity Development in instruction: An inductive model. Educational Psychologist, 44, 105–118.
  • Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Eisenberg, M. (2000). Beyond black boxes: bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 7–30.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–323.
  • Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 23–52.
  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195–208.
  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
  • Solvoll, B. A., & Heggen, K. (2003). Læring i sykepleiepraksis [Learning in nursing practice]. In M. S. Bjerknes & I. T. Bjørk (Eds.), Å lære i praksis – en veiviser for studenten. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Tajfel, H. (1972). La catégorisation sociale [Social categorization]. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (pp. 272–302). Paris, France: Larousse.
  • Tanggaard, L. (2006). Situating gendered learning in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18, 220–234.
  • Thrysøe, L. (2011). At blive og at være sygeplejerske: En undersøgelse af oplevelsen ved at være næsten færdiguddannet og nyuddannet sygeplejerske og interaktionens betydning for deltagelse i praksisfællesskabet [Becoming and being a nurse: An investigation of the experience of being a nearly qualified and a newly qualified nurse and the significance of interaction for participation in the community of practice] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Research Unit of Nursing, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Urdan, T., & Turner, J. C. (2005). Competence motivation in the classroom. In A. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 297–317). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • von Glasersfeld, E. (2001). Radical constructivism and teaching. Prospects, 31, 161–173.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Wortham, S. (2004). From good student to outcast: The emergence of a classroom identity. Ethos, 32, 164–187.
  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.