Conceptualizing Debates in Learning and Educational Research: Toward a Complex Systems Conceptual Framework of Learning

REFERENCES

• Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11–13. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029004011
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5–11. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025004005
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 18–21. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026001018
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). Dynamics of complex systems. New York, NY: Perseus.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2005). Technology and literacies: From print literacy to dialogic literacy. In N. Bascia, A. Cumming, A. Datnow, K. Leithwood, & D. Livingstone (Eds.), International handbook of educational policy (pp. 749–761). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. (2006). On the implications of neuroscience research for science teaching and learning: Are there any? A skeptical theme and variations: The primacy of psychology in the science of learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 5, 104–110. http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-03-0153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clancey, W. J. (2008). Scientific antecedents of situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 11–34). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning prespectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002004
   Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., & Steinkuehler, C. A. (2003). Cognitive and situative theories of learning and instruction. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 800–805). London, UK: Nature.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 265–281). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex. New York, NY: Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L. (2006). The complex systems see-change in education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 35–43. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026001005
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal Systems Science & Complexity, 19, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J., & Kapur, M. (2012). Learning environments as emergent phenomena: Theoretical and methodological implications of complexity. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed., pp. 303–334). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., Hung, D., Jacobson, M. J., Voiklis, J., & Victor, C. D.-T. (2007). Emergence of learning in computer-supported, large-scale collective dynamics: A research agenda. In Computer supported collaborative learning conference. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2005). Problem solving seen through the lens of complex evolutionary activity: A novel theoretical and analytical framework for analyzing problem-solving processes. In B. G. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the cognitive science conference (pp. 1096–1101). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2008). Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers and Education, 51, 54–66. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L. (2010). Emergence in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 751–770. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01116.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pribram, K., & King, J. (1996). Learning as self organization. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (1999). The emergence of creativity. Philosophical Psychology, 12, 447–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2004). The mechanisms of emergence. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34, 260–282. http://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103262553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1999). Can there be a science of complex systems? In Y. Bar-Yam (Ed.), Unifying themes in complex systems (pp. 3–14). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., & Nolen, S. B. (2015). Introduction: The relevance of the situative perspective in educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 50, 167–172. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera, A. H., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 7–48. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar