Two-Year Community: Identifying Differences in Learning Strategies by Demographics and Course Grade in a Community College Context

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. AAAS.
   Google Scholar
• Cassady, J. C. (2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(12).
   Google Scholar
• Clement, L. (2016). External and internal barriers to studying can affect student success and retention in a diverse classroom. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(3), 351–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cole, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2010). Accuracy of self-reported SAT and ACT test scores: Implications for research. Research in Higher Education, 51(4), 305–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychologic Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. K., Bond, J. B, & Denton, D. W (2012). An analytical literature review of the effects of metacognitive teaching strategies in primary and secondary student populations. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Development, 1(1), 9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. K., Denton, D. W., & Bond, J. B. (2014). An analysis of research on metacognitive teaching strategies. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4015–4024.
   Google Scholar
• Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutierrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Moses Okpodu, C., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M. F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15, es5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, F. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of psychological inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the interpretation of x2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J., Pfund, C., & Miller, S. (2006). Scientific teaching. W. H. Freeman & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hartle, R. T., Baviskar, S., & Smith, R. (2012). A field guide to constructivism in the college science classroom: Four essential criteria and a guide to their usage. Bioscene, 38(2), 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, M. J., Dwyer, C. P., Harney, O. M., Noone, C., & Conway, R. J. (2015). Metacognitive skill development and applied systems science: A framework of metacognitive skills, self regulatory functions and real-world applications. In A. Pena-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 76–106). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Dignath-van Ewijk, C., Buttner, G., & Klieme, E. (2010). Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms: Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), 157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutwyler, B. (2009). Metacognitive learning strategies: Differential development patterns in high school. Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. A. (2015). Learning how students learn: An exploration of self-regulation strategies in a two-year college general chemistry class. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(3), 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 1999. Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 2009. A new biology for the 21st century: Ensuring the United States leads the coming biology revolution. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parson, M., & Brown, K. S. (2002). Educator as reflective practitioner and action researcher. Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. A., Porter, S. R., & Rogers, J. (2017). Understanding student self-reports of academic performance and course-taking behavior. AERA Open, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417711427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenman, R., Tennekoon, V., & Hill, L. G. (2011). Measuring bias in self-reported data. International Journal of Behavioral & Healthcare Research, 2(4), 320–332.
   Google Scholar
• Saribas, D., & Bayram, H. (2016). Investigation of the effects of using metacognitive activities in chemistry laboratory on the development of conceptual understanding. Bogaziçi University Journal of Education, 33(1), 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Schinske, J. N., Balke, V L., Bangera, M. G., Bonney, K. M., Brownell, S. E., Carter, R. S., Curran-Everett, D., Dolan, E. L., Elliot, S. L., Fletcher, L., Gonzalez, B., Gorga, J. J., Hewlett, J. A., Kiser, S. L., McFarland, J. L., Misra, A., Nenortas, A., Ngeve, S. M., Pape-Lindstrom, P A., Seidel, S. B., Tuthill, M. C., Yin, Y, & Corwin, L. A. (2017). Broadening participation in biology education research: Engaging community college students and faculty. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11, 113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R. F. (1954). Correlation between a discrete and a continuous variable. Point-biserial correlation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(3), 603–607.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2019). Race & ethnicity. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.census.gov/mso/www/training/pdf/race-ethnicity-onepager.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2019). White House initiative on educational excellence for Hispanics. https://sites.ed.gov/hispanic-initiative/hispanic-serving-institutions-hsis
   Google Scholar
• van der Stel, M., & Veenman, M. V J. (2008). Relation between intellectual ability and metacognitive skillfulness as predictors of learning performance of young students performing tasks in different domains. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(1), 128–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. R. (2014). The limitations of self-report measures of non-cognitive skills. Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, N., Wardeska, J. G., McGuire, S. Y, & Cook, E. (2014). Metacognition: An effective tool to promote success in college science learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(4), 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. A., Caldwell, C. H., Bernat, D. H. (2002). Discrepancy between self-report and school-record grade point average: Correlates with psychosocial outcomes among African American adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 86–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar