References

  • Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE— Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6.
  • Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529–553.
  • Bussey, T. J., & Orgill, M. (2015). What do biochemistry students pay attention to in external representations of protein translation? The case of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 714–730.
  • Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10–13.
  • Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design. https://projects.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/pubs_p/docs/poster.pdf
  • Chen, C. M., & Wu, C. H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 80, 108–121.
  • Cook, M. P (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 10731091.
  • Cox, R., McKendree, J., Tobin, R., Lee, J., & Mayes, T. (1999). Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse. Instructional Science, 27(6), 431–458.
  • Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (supplement 4), 13614–13620.
  • Dawson, V., & Van Loosen, I. (2012). Use of online video in a first year tertiary mathematics unit. In A. Herrington, J. Schrape, & K. Singh (Eds.), Engaging students with learning technologies (pp. 35–46). Curtin Teaching and Learning.
  • diSessa, A. A. (2014). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 88–108). Cambridge University Press.
  • Duit, R. H., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Conceptual change: Still a powerful framework for improving the practice of science instruction. In C. D. T. Kim & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research (pp. 43–54). Springer Netherlands.
  • Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182.
  • Dupuis, J., Coutu, J., & Laneuville, O. (2013). Application of linear mixed-effect models for the analysis of exam scores: Online video associated with higher scores for undergraduate students with lower grades. Computers & Education, 66, 64–73.
  • Eick, C. J., & King Jr., D. T. (2012). Nonscience majors’ perceptions on the use of YouTube video to support learning in an integrated science lecture. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(1), 26–30.
  • Guo, P J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014, March). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the First Association for Computing Machinery Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 41–50). Association for Computing Machinery.
  • He, Y, Swenson, S., & Lents, N. (2012). Online video tutorials increase learning of difficult concepts in an undergraduate analytical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(9), 1128–1132.
  • Hegarty, M. (2005). Multimedia learning about physical systems. In R. Mayer & R. E. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 447–465). Cambridge University Press.
  • Heidig, S., Müller, J., & Reichelt, M. (2015). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Differentiation on relevant design features and their effects on emotions and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 81–95.
  • Hill, J. L., & Nelson, A. (2011). New technology, new pedagogy? Employing video podcasts in learning and teaching about exotic ecosystems. Environmental Education Research, 17(3), 393–408.
  • Hoogerheide, V, Loyens, S. M., & van Gog, T. (2016a). Learning from video modeling examples: Does gender matter? Instructional Science, 44(1), 69–86.
  • Hoogerheide, V., van Wermeskerken, M., Loyens, S. M., & van Gog, T. (2016b). Learning from video modeling examples: Content kept equal, adults are more effective models than peers. Learning and Instruction, 44, 22–30.
  • James, S., Brown, J., Gilbee, T., & Rees, C. (2013, January). Use and perceptions of worked example videos for first-year students studying mathematics in a primary education degree. In Proceedings of the Ninth Southern Hemisphere Conference on Teaching and Learning Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics (Shining Through the Fog, Lighthouse Delta) (pp. 24–29). University of Western Sydney.
  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83.
  • Johnstone, A. H. (1993). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701.
  • Jolley, D. F., Wilson, S. R., Kelso, C., O’Brien, G., & Mason, C. E. (2016). Analytical thinking, analytical action: Using prelab video demonstrations and e-quizzes to improve undergraduate preparedness for analytical chemistry practical classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(11), 1855–1862.
  • Kartal, G. (2010). Does language matter in multimedia learning? Personalization principle revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 615.
  • Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831.
  • Kay, R., & Kletskin, I. (2012). Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach mathematics in higher education. Computers & Education, 59(2), 619–627.
  • Lawson, T. J., Bodle, J. H., & McDonough, T. A. (2007). Techniques for increasing student learning from educational videos: Notes versus guiding questions. Teaching of Psychology, 34(2), 90–93.
  • Liew, T. W., Tan, S. M., & Jayothisa, C. (2013). The effects of peer-like and expert-like pedagogical agents on learners’ agent perceptions, task-related attitudes, and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 275–286.
  • Linn, M. (2003). Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 727–758.
  • Ljubojevic, M., Vaskovic, V., Stankovic, S., & Vaskovic, J. (2014). Using supplementary video in multimedia instruction as a teaching tool to increase efficiency of learning and quality of experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 275–291.
  • Lobato, J., & Walker, C. (2019). How viewers orient toward student dialogue in online math videos. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 38(2), 177–200.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171–173.
  • Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64.
  • Mayer, R. E., & Estrella, G. (2014). Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction. Learning and Instruction, 33, 12–18.
  • Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 389.
  • Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
  • McDonnell, L., Barker, M. K., & Wieman, C. (2016). Concepts first, jargon second improves student articulation of understanding. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(1), 12–19.
  • Mitra, B., Lewin-Jones, J., Barrett, H., & Williamson, S. (2010). The use of video to enable deep learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 15(4), 405–414.
  • Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in hightech and multimedia environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 63–67.
  • Moreno, R., & Flowerday, T. (2006). Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarityattraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 186–207.
  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358.
  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117.
  • Muller, D. A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2007). Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 144–155.
  • Muller, D. A., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P (2008). Raising cognitive load with linear multimedia to promote conceptual change. Science Education, 92(2), 278–296.
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
  • Newman, E. J., & Schwarz, N. (2018). Good sound, good research: How audio quality influences perceptions of the research and researcher. Science Communication, 40(2), 246–257.
  • Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128–140.
  • Prud’homme-Généreux, A., Schiller, N. A., Wild, J. H., & Herreid, C. F (2017). Guidelines for producing videos to accompany flipped cases. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(5), 40.
  • Richards-Babb, M., Curtis, R., Smith, V J., & Xu, M. (2014). Problem solving videos for general chemistry review: Students’ perceptions and use patterns. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1796–1803.
  • Seethaler, S., Czworkowski, J., & Wynn, L. (2017). Analyzing general chemistry texts’ treatment of rates of change concepts in reaction kinetics reveals missing conceptual links. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(1), 28–36.
  • Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370.
  • Smith, S. J., & Harvey, E. E. (2014). K-12 online lesson alignment to the principles of universal design for learning: The Khan Academy. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 29(3), 222–242.
  • Stieff, M., Werner, S. M., Fink, B., & Meador, D. (2018). Online prelaboratory videos improve student performance in the general chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(8), 1260–1266.
  • Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell, 162(5), 933–936.
  • Story, M. F. (2001). Principles of universal design. In: W. F. E. Preiser & E. Ostroff (Eds.), Universal design handbook. McGraw-Hill.
  • Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34.
  • Sweller, J., & Chandler, P (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185–233.
  • Tasker, R. (2016). ConfChem Conference on interactive visualizations for chemistry teaching and learning: Research into practice—visualizing the molecular world for a deep understanding of chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(6), 1152–1153.
  • Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Wright, L. K., Cardenas, J. J., Liang, P., & Newman, D. L. (2017). Arrows in biology: Lack of clarity and consistency points to confusion for learners. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), ar6.
  • Yezierski, E. J., & Birk, J. P (2006). Misconceptions about the particulate nature of matter. Using animations to close the gender gap. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(6), 954.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.