Effect of Exam Wrappers on Student Achievement in Multiple, Large STEM Courses

References

• Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). What are exam wrappers and how can we use them? In How learning works: Seven researchbased principles for smart teaching (pp. 251–254). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. S., Beall, L. C., & Hodges, L. C. (in press). Using the LMS for exam wrapper feedback to prompt metacognitive awareness in large courses. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, E., Kennedy, E., McGuire, S. Y. (2013). Effect of teaching metacognitive learning strategies on performance in general chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(8), 961–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberly Center. (2016). Exam wrappers. https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/teach/examwrappers
   Google Scholar
• Gezer-Templeton, P G., Mayhew, E. J., Korte, D. S., & Schmidt, S. J. (2017). Use of exam wrappers to enhance students’ metacognitive skills in a large introductory food science and human nutrition course. Journal of Food Science Education, 16, 28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. M., & Vallin, L. M. (2018). Evaluating the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory using empirical factor-structure evidence. Metacognition and Learning, 13(1), 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1999). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, L. C., Anderson, E. C., Carpenter, T. S., Cui, L., Feeser, E. A., & Gierasch, T. M. (2017). Using clickers for deliberate practice in five large science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(2), 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M., Silver, N., Lavaque-Manty, D., & Meizlish, D. (Eds.) (2013). Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning: Across the discipline, across the academy. Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Kustritz, M. V. R., & Clarkson, C. E. (2017). Use of examination wrappers to direct student self-assessment of examination preparation: A pilot study. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 44(2), 338–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. C. (2013). Make exams worth more than the grade: Using exam wrappers to promote metacognition. In M. Kaplan, D. LaVaque-Manty, D. Meizlish, & N. Silver (Eds.), Reflection and metacognition in college teaching (pp. 18–52). Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, S. Y (2015). Teach students how to learn: Strategies you can incorporate into any course to improve student metacognition, study skills, and motivation. Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebesta, A. J., & Speth, E. B. (2017). How should I study for the exam? Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in introductory biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soicher, R. N., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2017). Do exam wrappers increase metacognition and performance? A single course intervention. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16(1), 64–73.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A., & Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, N., Wardeska, J. G., McGuire, S., & Cook, E. (2014). Metacognition: An effective tool to promote success in college science learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(4), 48–53.
   Google Scholar