References

  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012, June 12). Why flipped classrooms are here to stay. https://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2012/06/12/fp_bergmann_sams.html
  • Bishop, J. L, & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research [Paper presentation]. 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
  • Bormann, J. (2014). Affordances of flipped learning and its effects on student engagement and achievement. Graduate Research Papers, 137, 29.
  • Bretzmann, J. (2013). Flipping 2.0: Practical strategies for flipping your class. Brezmann Group.
  • Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71.
  • Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.
  • Ekici, G. (2010). An examination of the high school student’s perceptions about biology laboratory environment education. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 5, 180–186.
  • Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 57, 14–27.
  • Herreid, C. F. (2002). Using case studies in science, and still covering content. In L. Michaelsen, A. Knight, & L. Fink (Eds.), Team based learning: A transformative use of small groups (pp. 109–118). Praeger.
  • Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
  • Ingram, D., Wiley, B., Miller, C., & Wy-berg, T. (2014). A study of the flipped math classroom in the elementary grades. University of Minnesota.
  • Mason, G., Shuman, T., & Cook, K. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435.
  • Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Prentice-Hall.
  • McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., & Mumper, R. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. AcademicMedicine, 89(2), 236–243.
  • Michaelsen, L. K. (1992). Team learning: A comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. To Improve the Academy, 11, 107–122.
  • Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A., & Fink, L. D. (2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups. Praeger.
  • Miller, K., Lasry, N., Lukoff, B., Schell, J., & Mazur, E. (2014). Conceptual question response times in peer instruction classrooms. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11, 1–8.
  • Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just in time teaching. American Journal of Physics, 67(10), 937–938.
  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.
  • Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 196.
  • Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49.
  • Simon, J. (2020). The ultimate guide to easily make instructional videos. https://www.techsmith.com/blog/instructional-videos/
  • Tune, J. D, Sturek, M., Basile, D. P (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37(4), 316–320.
  • Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41.
  • Zeidan, A. (2010). The relationship between grade 11 Palestinian attitudes toward biology and their perceptions of the biology learning environment. International Journal of Science andMathematics Education, 8(5), 783–800.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.