8
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Departments

Two Year Community: Sustainability, Energy, and the Green Economy: An Interdisciplinary Course on Environmental Sustainability and Life Cycle Analysis

References

  • Anderson, Â., & Kalman, H. (2010). Reflections on learning in interdisciplinary settings. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 204–208.
  • Bakshi, B. R., Gutowski, T. G., & Sekulic, D. P. (2011). Thermodynamics and the destruction of resources. Cambridge University Press.
  • Barlett, P., & Chase, G. (Eds.). (2013). Sustainability in higher education: Stories and strategies for transformation. MIT Press.
  • Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The cognitive domain. David McKay Publications.
  • Ceulemans, G., & Severijns, N. (2019). Challenges and benefits of student sustainability research projects in view of education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(3), 482–499.
  • Cooper, J. S., & Fava, J. (2000a). Teaching life-cycle assessment at universities in North America. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3, 13–17.
  • Cooper, J. S., & Fava, J. (2000b). Teaching life-cycle assessment at universities in North America, II: Building capacity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4, 1–15.
  • Coops, N.C., Marcus, J., Construt, I., Frank, E., Kellett, R., Mazzi, E., Munro, A., Nesbit, S., Riseman, A., Robinson, J., Schultz, A., & Sipos, Y (2015). How an entry-level, interdisciplinary sustainability course revealed the benefits and challenges of a university-wide initiative for sustainability education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 16, 729–747.
  • DeZure, D. (2010). Interdisciplinary pedagogies in higher education. In R. Frodeman, J. Thompson Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 372–386). Oxford University Press.
  • Evans, G., Galvin, K., & Doroodchi, E. (2008). Introducing quantitative life cycle analysis into the chemical engineering curriculum. Education for Chemical Engineers, 3(1), 57–65.
  • Guggenheim, D. (Director). (2006). An inconvenient truth: A global warning [DVD]. Paramount.
  • Gutowski, T. (2014). Energy, sustainability and LCA short course. MIT Professional Education.
  • Harris, D. C. (2007). Quantitative chemical analysis. W.H. Freeman and Co.
  • Henson, R. (2011). The rough guide to climate change. Rough Guides.
  • Holley, K. A. (2009). Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 1–131.
  • Koenig, K., Sehen, M., Bao, L. (2012). Explicitly targeting pre-service teacher scientific reasoning abilities and understanding of nature of science through an introductory science course. Science Educator, 21(2), 1–9.
  • Kurland, N., Michaud, K., Best, M., Wohldmann, E., Cox, H., Pontikis, K., & Vasishth, A. (2010). Overcoming silos: The role of an interdisciplinary course in shaping a sustainability network. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 457–476.
  • Lin, K., Levan, A., & Dossick, C.S. (2012). Teaching lifecycle thinking in construction materials and methods: evaluation of and deployment strategies for life-cycle assessment in construction engineering and management education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 138(3), 163–170.
  • Llewellyn, A. B., Hendrix, J. P., Golden, K. C. (2008). Green jobs: A guide to eco-friendly employment. Adams Media Corp.
  • McConnell, R. L., & Abel, D. C. (2012). Environmental issues: Looking towards a sustainable future. (4th ed.) Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Meo, M., Bowman, K., Brandt, K., Dillner, M., Finley, D., Henry, J., Sedlacek, K., & Winner, A., (2014). Teaching life-cycle assessment with sustainable minds: A discussion with examples of student projects. Journal of Sustainability Education, 7, 2151–7452.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2018). The integration of the humanities and arts with sciences, engineering, and medicine in higher education: Branches from the same tree. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24988.
  • Ottman, J. A. (2011). The new rules of green marketing: Strategies, tools, and inspiration for sustainable branding. Greenleaf Publishing.
  • Paletta, A., & Bonoli, A. (2019). Governing the university in the perspective of the United Nations 2030 agenda. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(3), 500–514.
  • Pisani, J.A. (2006). Sustainable development-historical roots of the concept, Environmental Sciences, 3(2), 83–96.
  • Shriberg, M., & Harris, K.E. (2012). Building sustainability change management and leadership skills in students: Lessons learned from “sustainability and the campus” at the University of Michigan. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2, 154–164.
  • Spelt, E. J. H., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H., Luning, P. A., & Mulder, M. (2009). Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 365–378.
  • Stevens, F. (2016). Before the flood. National Geographic Documentary Films.
  • Theis, T., & Tomkin, J. (2015). Sustainability: A comprehensive foundation. OpenStax CNX. https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/96
  • Vargas, L., Mac-Lean, C., & Huge, J. (2019). The maturation process of incorporating sustainability in universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(3), 441–451.
  • Vice. (2017, July 21). The future of energy [YouTube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd8O5YE8Uak
  • Wood, K., Koenig, K., Owens, L., & Bao, L. (2018). Development of student abilities in control of variables at a two-year college. AURCO Journal, 24, 164–179.
  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
  • Zhou, S., Han, J., Koenig, K., Raplinger, A., Pi, Y., Li, D., Xiao, H., Fu, Z., & Bao, L. (2016). Assessment of student reasoning: The effects of task context, data, and design on student reasoning in control of variables. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 175–187.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.