8
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research and Teaching

Implementing Peer-Led Team Learning and Cyber Peer-Led Team Learning in an Organic Chemistry Course

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. https://online-learningsurvey.com/reports/digtial-learningcompassenrollment2017.pdf
  • Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1–23.
  • Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from randomized trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111.
  • Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1996). Do mediated contexts differ in information richness? A comparison of collocated and dispersed meetings. In 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 92–101). Maui, Hawaii.
  • Chan, J. Y. K., & Bauer, C. F. (2015). Effect of peer-led team learning (PLTL) on student achievement, attitude, and self-concept in college general chemistry in randomized and quasi experimental designs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 319–346.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4th ed.). Harper & Row.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
  • Dorner, H. (2012). Effects of online mentoring in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: Mentor presence and cognitive engagement. American Journal of Distance Education, 26(3), 157–171.
  • Elam, C., Seaver, D. C., Berres, P. N., & Brandt, B. F. (2002). Preparation for medical, dental, pharmacy, physical therapy, and physician assistant careers: Helping students gain a competitive edge. Journal of College Admission, 176, 16–21.
  • Finn, K., & Campisi, J. (2015). Implementing and evaluating a Peer-Led Team Learning approach in undergraduate anatomy and physiology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(06), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst15_044_06_38
  • Gafney, L. (2001). Workshop evaluation. In D. K. Gosser, M. S. Cracolice, J. A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V. S. Strozak, & P. Varma-Nelson (Eds.), Peer-Led Team Learning: A guidebook (pp. 75–93). Prentice Hall.
  • Gafney, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2008). Peer-Led Team Learning: Evaluation, dissemination and institutionalization of a college level initiative. Springer.
  • Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148.
  • Gaston, J. L. (2004). An analysis of a special peer-led team learning mathematics. Assessment Essentials, 1(1), 2–4.
  • Gosser, D. K., Cracolice, M. S., Kampmeier, J. A., Roth, V., Strozak, V., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2001). Peer-Led Team Learning: A guidebook. Prentice Hall.
  • Gosser, D. K., Kampmeier, J. A., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2010). Peer-Led Team Learning: 2008 James Flack Norris Award address. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(4), 374380.
  • Gosser, D., Roth, V., Gafney, L., Kampmeier, J., Strozak, V., Varma-Nelson, P., Radel, S., & Weiner, M. (1996). Workshop chemistry: Overcoming the barriers to student success. The Chemical Educator, 7(1), 1–17.
  • Graham, C. R. (2005). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.
  • Horwitz, S., & Rodger, S. H. (2009). Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 163–167.
  • Mauser, K., Sours, J., Banks, J., Newbrough, J. R., Janke, T., Shuck, L., & Zhu, L. (2011). Cyber Peer-Led Team Learning (cPLTL): Development and implementation. EDUCAUSEReview Online, 1–17.
  • McIssac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C. (1996). Distance education. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 403–437). Macmillan.
  • Means, B., Yukie, T., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–47.
  • Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309–320.
  • Olson, S., & Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President.
  • Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L. L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209.
  • Preszler, R. W. (2009). Replacing lecture with peer-led workshops improves student learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 8, 182–192.
  • Quitadamo, I. J., Brahler, C. J., & Crouch, G. J. (2009). Peer-Led Team Learning: A prospective method for increasing critical thinking in undergraduate science courses. Science Educator, 18(1), 29–39.
  • Rosner, B., & Grove, D. (1999). Use of the Mann-Whitney U-test for clustered data. Statistics in Medicine, 18(11), 1387–1400.
  • Schray, K., Russo, M. J., Egolf, R., Lademan, W., & Gelormo, D. (2009). Are in-class peer leaders effective in the peer-led team-learning approach? Journal of College Science Teaching, 58(4), 62–67.
  • Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
  • Smith, J., Wilson, S. B., Banks, J., Zhu, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2014). Replicating Peer-Led Team Learning in cyberspace: Research, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(6), 714–740.
  • Tagg, A. C. (1994). Leadership from within: Student moderation of computer conferences. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 40–50.
  • Tien, L. T., Roth, V., & Kampmeier, J. A. (2002). Implementation of a peer-led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(7), 606–632.
  • Tutty, J., & Klein, J. (2008). Computermediated instruction: A comparison of online and face-to-face collaboration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 101–124.
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). Healthcare occupations. http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/home.htm
  • Wilson, S. B. & Varma-Nelson, P. (2016). Small groups, significant impact: A review of Peer-Led Team Learning research with implications for STEM education researchers and faculty. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(10), 1686–1702.
  • Wilson, S. B., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2019). Characterization of first-semester organic chemistry peer-led team learning and cyber peer-led team learning students’ use and explanation of electronpushing formalism. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00387

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.