What to Expect With Group Work: Problems, Frequency, and Success of Mediation

References

• Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255–264.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, M., Kembro, J., Notander, J., Petersson, C., & Ohlsson, L. (2011). Conflict management in student groups—a teacher’s perspective in higher education. Högre utbildning, 1(2), 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. M., & Ammons, J. L. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments. Journal of Education for Business, 78(5), 268–272.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., & Bauer, C. (2015). Effect of Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL) on student achievement, attittude and self-concept in college general chemistry in randomized and quasi experimental designs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21197
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, W. M. (2009). Groupwork as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 58(4), 563–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1996). Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 44(2), 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2007). Cooperative learning. In P. A. Mabrouk (Ed.), Active learning: Models from the analytical sciences (pp. 34–53). American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L., & Greenacre, L. (2011). An examination of socially destructive behaviors in group work. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(1), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Harkins, S. G., & Jackson, J. M. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(4), 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167285114011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V (1974). Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90033-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2000). Cooperative learning, values, and culturally plural classrooms. Palmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosa, D. K., & Volet, S. E. (2013). Promoting effective collaborative case-based learning at university: a metacognitive intervention. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 870889. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.604409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2001). Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Moog, R. S., & Spencer, J. N. (2008). Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL). ACS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, B. K., Sumter, M., & Monk-Turner, E. (2005). Conflict resolution and group work. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(2), 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research of cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48(5), 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, L., Donovan, S. S., & Stanne, M. E. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, J. T., & Anderson, R. E. (1990). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Svinicki, M. D., & Schallert, D. L. (2016). Learning through group work in the college classroom: Evaluating the evidence from an instructional goal perspective. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher ediucation: Handbook of theory and cesearch (Vol. 31, pp. 513–538).
   Google Scholar
• Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., Tesluk, P. E. (2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34(2): 170–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J., & Van der Liert, E. (2001). Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall Jr., J. A., Stark, J. B., & Standifer, R. L. (2001). Mediation: A current review and theory development. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(3), 370–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, T. J. (2007). Evaluation tools to guide students’ peer-assessment and self-assessment in group activities for the lab and classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(1), 182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. (1992). Student attitudes towards approaches to learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 17(1), 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Johnston, L., & Kilic, G. B. (2008). Assessing the reliability of self-and peer rating in student group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 329–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar