Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Spanning Two Semesters of Biology Impact Student Self-Efficacy but not Future Goals

References

• Ainscough, L., Foulis, E., Colthorpe, K., Zimbardi, K., Robertson-Dean, M., Chunduri, P., & Lluka, L. (2016). Changes in biology selfefficacy during a first-year university course. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(2), ar19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allee, V. (2000). Knowledge networks and communities of practice. OD Practitioner, 32(4), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. AAAS.
   Google Scholar
• Auchincloss, L. C., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, C. M., Pelaez, N., & Rowland, S. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: a meeting report. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 29–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action : A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014). Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 602–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Singla, V., Chandler Seawell, P., Conklin Imam, J. F., Eddy, S. L., Stearns, T., & Cyert, M. S. (2015). A high-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(2), ar21. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.l4-05-0092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Kloser, M. J., Fukami, T., & Shavelson, R. (2012). Undergraduate biology lab courses: Comparing the impact of traditionally based” cookbook” and authentic research-based courses on student lab experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 36.
   Google Scholar
• California State University Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (CSU-LSAMP). (n.d.). https://www.csus.edu/csu-lsamp/
   Google Scholar
• Caspers, M. L., & Roberts-Kirchhoff, E. S. (2003). An undergraduate biochemistry laboratory course with an emphasis on a research experience. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31(5), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.2003.494031050257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemers, M. M., Hu, L., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology 93(1), 5564. https://doi.org/10.1037/Z0022-0663.93.1.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corwin, L. A., Graham, M. J., & Dolan, E. L. (2015). Modeling course-based undergraduate research experiences: An agenda for future research and evaluation. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), es1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, C., & Cunningham, M. (2006). Enhancing diversity in science: Is teaching science process skills the answer? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 5(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-10-0121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolan, E. L. (2016). Course-based undergraduate research experiences: Current knowledge and future directions. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_177288.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Drew, J. C., & Triplett, E. W (2008). Whole genome sequencing in the undergraduate classroom: outcomes and lessons from a pilot course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 9(1), 3–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P (2014). Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-10-0204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–241. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.92315ww157656k3u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutierrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M. F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), es5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K. M., & Einarson, J. (2017). Gender, math confidence, and grit: Relationships with quantitative skills and performance in an undergraduate biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(3), ar47. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-08-0253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 6(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-09-0194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanauer, D. I., Graham, M. J., & Hatfull, G. F. (2016). A measure of college student persistence in the sciences (PITS). CBE Life Sci Educ, 15(4), ar54. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-09-0185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, P. R., Schultz, P. W., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Chance, R. C. (2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08980-000
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. T., Barlow, A. E. L., & Villarejo, M. (2010). Importance of undergraduate research for minority persistence and achievement in biology. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 82–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, T. C., Burnett, S. H., Carson, S., Caruso, S. M., Clase, K., DeJong, R. J., Dennehy, J. J., Denver, D. R., Dunbar, D., Elgin, S. C., Findley, A. M., Gissendanner, C. R., Golebiewska, U. P., Guild, N., Hartzog, G. A., Grillo, W. H., Hollowell, G. P., Hughes, L. E., Johnson, A. … Hatfull, G. F. (2014). A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. MBio, 5(1), e01051–13. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01051-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloser, M. J., Brownell, S. E., Shavelson, R. J., & Fukami, T. (2013). Effects of a research-based ecology lab course: A study of nonvolunteer achievement, self-confidence, and perception of lab course purpose. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(3), 72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Knekta, E., Runyon, C., & Eddy, S. (2019). One size doesn’t fit all: Using factor analysis to gather validity evidence when using surveys in your research. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 78(1), rml. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2015). MVN: multivariate normality tests. The R Journal, 6(2), 151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (learning in Doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. K., & Landerholm, T. E. (2018). Making researchers of STEM undergraduates. Scientia, STEM Education. http://www.scientia.global/dr-kelly-mcdonald-dr-thomas-landerholm-making-researchers-of-stem-undergraduates.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. K., Martin, A. R., Watters, C. P., & Landerholm, T. E. (2019). A faculty development model for transforming a department’s laboratory curriculum with course-based undergraduate research experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(3), 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Bower Glienke, B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzes, J. J., & Leonard, W. H. (2006). Handbook of college science teaching: Theory, research, and practice. National Science Teaching Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mordacq, J. C., Drane, D. L., Swarat, S. L., & Lo, S. M. (2017). Development of course-based undergraduate research experiences using a design-based approach. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(4), 64–75.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine (NASEM). (2015). Integrating discovery-based research into the undergraduate curriculum: Report of a convocation. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olimpo, J. T., Fisher, G. R., & Dechenne-Peters, S. E. (2016). Development and evaluation of the tigriopus course-based undergraduate research experience: Impacts on students’ content knowledge, attitudes, and motivation in a majors introductory biology course. CBE Life Sciences Education, 75(4), ar72. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-11-0228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, S., & Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, A., Street, P., & Colleges, W. S. (2002). An analysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math and engineering majors. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 5(1), 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, T. D., Warner, D. M., Ludlow, L. H., & O’Connor, C. M. (2018). Pathways over time: Functional genomics research in an introductory laboratory course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 77(1), ar1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-01-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2014). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenbusch, S. E., Hernandez, P. R., Simmons, S. L., & Dolan, E. L. (2016). Early engagement in course-based research increases graduation rates and completion of science, engineering, and mathematics degrees. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 75(2), ar20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, D., Prather, P., & Zeilik, M. (2006). Stratergies for interactive engagment in large lecture science survey classes. In J. J. Mintzes & W. H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 45–53). National Science Teaching Association.
   Google Scholar
• Staub, N. L., Poxleitner, M., Braley, A., Smith-Flores, H., Pribbenow, C. M., Jaworski, L., Lopatto, D., & Anders, K. R. (2016). Scaling up: Adapting a phage-hunting course to increase participation of first-year students in research. CBE Life Sciences Education, 75(2), ar13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-10-0211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. TRENDS in Sport Sciences, 7(21), 19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vargha, A., & Delaney, H. D. (2000). A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25(2), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986025002101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarejo, M., Barlow, A. E. L., Kogan, D., Veazey, B. D., Sweeney, J. K., & Siegel, V. (2008). Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: Career paths survey results. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-04-0018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar