References
- American Association of Universities. (2017). AAU STEM project sites. www.aau.edu/aau-stem-project-sites
- Burd, G. D., Tomanek, D., Blowers, P., Bolger, M., Cox, J., Elfring, L., Grubbs, E., Hunter, J., Johns, K., Lazos, L., Lysecky, R., Milsom, J. A., Novodvorsky, I., Pollard, J., Prather, E., Talanquer, V., Thamvichai, K., Tharp, H., & Wallace, C. (2016). Developing faculty cultures for evidence-based practices in STEM: A progress report. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century, (pp. 90–102). Purdue University Press.
- Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Weiman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031), 862–864.
- Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984.
- Heron, P. R. L. (2004). Empirical investigations of learning and teaching, part II: Developing research-based instructional materials. In 3 & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi” course CLVI: Research on physics education (pp. 351–365). IOS Press.
- Hieggelke, C., Maloney, D., & Kanim, S. (2012). Newtonian tasks inspired by physics education research: nTI-PERs. Pearson.
- Lawson, R. A., & McDermott, L. C. (1987). Student understanding of the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems. American Journal of Physics, 55(9), 811–817.
- Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. In A. S. Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming digest (pp. 109–113). University of Maryland.
- Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user ’s manual. Prentice Hall.
- McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (2008). Tutorials in introductory physics. Pearson.
- McGrath, S. (2015). Physics 141 student outcomes: Comparison between experimental and traditional teaching methods. External evaluator report. University of Arizona.
- O’Kuma, T. L., Maloney, D. P., & Hieggelke, C. J. (2008). Ranking task exercises in physics. Pearson.
- Otero, V., Finkelstein, N., McCray, R., & Pollock, S. (2006). Who is responsible for preparing physics teachers? Science 313 (5786), 445–446.
- Prather, E. E., & Brissenden, G. (2009). Development and application of a situated apprenticeship approach to professional development of astronomy instructors. Astronomy Education Review, 7(2), 1–17.
- Pride, T. O., Vokos, S., & McDermott, L. C. (1998). The challenge of matching learning assessments to teaching goals: An example from the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems. American Journal of Physics, 66(2), 147–157.
- Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1980). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. American Journal of Physics, 48(12), 1020–1028.
- University of Arizona. (2021). Teaching resources. https://w3.physics.arizona.edu/undergrad/teaching-resources.
- Wallace, C. S. (2020). Developing peer instruction questions for quantitative problems for an upper-division astronomy course. American Journal of Physics, 88(3), 214–221.
- Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2012). Sears & Zemansky’s university physics with modern physics (13th ed.). Pearson.