Use of a Linked-Course Model to Teach Scientific Writing to First-Year Undergraduates

References

• Auchincloss, L. C., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, C. M., Pelaez, N., Rowland, S., Towns, M., Trautmann, N. M., Varma-Nelson, P., Weston, T. J., & Dolan, E. L. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: a meeting report. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 29–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balgopal, M., & Wallace, A. (2013). Writing-to-learn, writing-to-communicate, & scientific literacy. The American Biology Teacher, 75(3), 170–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangera, G., & Brownell, S. E. (2014). Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 602–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradforth, S. E., Miller, E. R., Dichtel, W. R., Leibovich, E. K., Feig, A. L., Martin, J. D., Bjorkman, K. S., Schultz, Z. D., & Smith, T. L. (2015). University learning: Improve undergraduate science education. Nature, 523(7560), 282–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Singla, V., Chander Seawell, P., Conklin Imam, J. F., Eddy, S. L., Stearns, T., & Cyert, M. S. (2015). A high-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(ar21), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Day, R. A. (1989). The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRAD format. American Medical Writers Association Journal, 4(2), 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gammill, L., Hansen, C., & Tinkler, S. (1992). Linked courses: a method to reinforce basic skills. Journal of Education for Business, 67(6), 358–360.
   Google Scholar
• Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 364–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. (2006). Toward a unified writing curriculum: integrating WAC/WIC with freshman composition. The WAC Journal, 17, 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, H. (2018). Continue our standard biology teaching practices? Bologna. BioScience, 68(8), 543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, A.H. (2017). Scientific writing and communication: Papers, proposals, and presentations (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Impey, C. (2013). Science literacy of undergraduates in the United States. Organizations, People and Strategies in Astronomy, 2, 353–364.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, E. P., Pearce, W. L., Smith, J. W., & Roe, R. M. (1990). Inheritance of the white larval trait in a laboratory colony of Manduca sexta (L.). American Entomologist, 36(4), 289–290.
   Google Scholar
• Luebke, S. R. (2002). Using linked courses in the general education curriculum. Academic Writing. http://aw.colostate.edu/articles/luebke_2002.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. H., & Gardner, A. (2006). Beyond the lab report: Why we must encourage more writing in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 325–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., Wyse, S. A., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Just the facts? Introductory undergraduate biology courses focus on low-level cognitive skills. CBE—Life Sciences Education 9(4), 435–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskovitz, C., & Kellogg, D. (2011). Science education. Inquiry-based writing in the laboratory course. Science, 332(6032): 919–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, K., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013, July 16). The impact of digital tools on student writing and how writing is taught in schools. Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Rauschert, E. S. J., Dauer, J., Momsen, J. L., & Sutton-Grier, A. (2011). Primary literature across the undergraduate curriculum: teaching science process skills and content. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 92(4), 396–405.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. A., Thaiss, C., Katkin, W., & Thompson, R. J. (2012). Writing-to-learn in undergraduate science education: a community-based, conceptually driven approach. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(1), 17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E. (1998). “Scientific writing”—A course to improve the writing of science students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 27(4), 267–272.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, C. A. (2010). Student confidence as a measure of learning in an undergraduate Principles of Horticultural Science course. HortTechnology, 20(4), 683–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollaci, L. B., & Pereira, M. G. (2004). The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: a fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(3), 364–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speth, E. B., Momsen, J. L., Moyerbrailean, G. A., Ebert-May, D., Long, T. L., Wyse, S., & Linton, D. (2010). 1, 2, 3, 4: Infusing quantitative literacy into introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(3), 323–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., & Lee, J. (2008). Confidence and cognitive test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 961–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, B. (1997). Writing in the disciplines, first year composition, and the research paper. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 2(1), 46–57.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., & Blankinship, L. A. (2015). Teaching information literacy skills to sophomore-level biology majors. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 16(1), 29–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turbek, S. P., Chock, T. M., Donahue, K., Havrilla, C. A., Oliverio, A.M., Polutchko, S. K., Shoemaker, L. G., & Vimercati, L. (2016). Scientific writing made easy: A step-by-step guide to undergraduate writing in the biological sciences. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 97(4), 417–426.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education (US DoE). (2016). STEM 2026: A vision for innovation in STEM education. https://www.air.org/system/files/downloads/report/STEM-2026-Vision-for-Innovation-September-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WAC Clearinghouse. (n.d.). What is writing in the disciplines? https://wac.colostate.edu/resources/wac/intro/wid/
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. S., Hand, B., & Pram, V. (2004). Writing and learning in the science classroom. Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, B. J., Obadi, O. M., & Lampert, E. C. 2017. Effects of carotenoid sequestration on a caterpillar’s cryptic coloration and susceptibility to predation. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 163(2), 177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodham, H., Marbach-Ad, G., Downey, G., Tomei, E., & Thompson, K. (2016). Enhancing scientific literacy in the undergraduate cell biology laboratory classroom. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(3), 458–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Selfmotivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Education Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar