Exploring Peer Learning Assistants’ Impact on Student Performance and Perceptions in an Undergraduate Biology Course

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2009). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. AAAS.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, S., Katzen, S., Patel, N., Sun, Y., & Emenike, M. (2017). Developing the preparation in STEM leadership programs for undergraduate academic peer leaders. Learning Assistance Review, 22(1), 49–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (1st ed). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bulte, C., Betts, A., Garner, K., & Durning, S. (2007). Student teaching: Views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Medical Teacher, 29(6), 583–590.
   Google Scholar
• Chapín, H. G., Wiggins, B. L., & Martin-Morris, L. E. (2014). Undergraduate science learners show comparable outcomes whether taught by undergraduate or graduate teaching assistants. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(2), 90–99.
   Google Scholar
• Chasteen, S. V., Perkins, K. K., Beale, P. D., Pollock, S. J., & Wieman, C. E. (2011). A thoughtful approach to instruction: Course transformation for the rest of us. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(4), 70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Froyd, J. E. (2008). White paper on promising practices in undergraduate STEM education. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_072616.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2008). Making students’ thinking explicit in writing and discussion: An analysis of formative assessment prompts. Science Education, 92(5), 798–824.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K. (2013). Teaching to learn: Analyzing the experiences of first-time physics learning assistants [Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado Boulder]. CU Scholar. https://scholar.colorado.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/rf55z7870
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. K., Wise, S. B., Rentsch, J., & Furtak, E. M. (2015). Cues matter: Learning assistants influence introductory biology student interactions during clicker-question discussions. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(4), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 298–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lockspeiser, T. M., O’Sullivan, P., Teherani, A., & Muller, J. (2008). Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: The value of social and cognitive congruence. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 361–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, V., Finkelstein, N., Mccray, R., & Pollock, S. (2006). Who is responsible for preparing science teachers? Science, 313(5786), 445–446.
   Google Scholar
• Philipp, S. B., Tretter, T. R., & Rich, C. V. (2016a). Development of undergraduate teaching assistants as effective instructors in STEM courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(3), 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Philipp, S. B., Tretter, T. R., & Rich, C. V. (2016b). Partnership for persistence: Exploring the influence of undergraduate teaching assistants in a gateway course for STEM majors. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 26–42.
   Google Scholar
• Philipp, S. B., Tretter, T. R., & Rich, C. V. (2016c). Undergraduate teaching assistant impact on student academic achievement. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, S. J. (2005, August 10–11). Transferring transformations: Learning gains, student attitudes, and the impacts of multiple instructors in large lecture courses [Paper presentation]. Physics Education Research Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Executive Office of the President.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, R. H., Sadler, P. M., & Loehr, J. F. (2005). Factors influencing success in introductory college chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42(9), 987–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, R. M., Hartley, L. M., & Liddick, L. (2015, April 11–14). Characterizing student engagement in a learning assistant supported biology course: The classroom as a social network [Paper presention]. National Association of Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, R. M., Hartley, L. M., Marzetta, K., & Wee, B. S. (2015). Transforming undergraduate science education with learning assistants: Student satisfaction in large enrollment courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(5), 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. N., Talbot, R. M., Doughty, L., Huvard, H., Le, P., Hartley, L., & Boyer, J. (2020). Development and application of the Action Taxonomy for Learning Assistants (ATLAs). International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Top, L. M., Schoonraad, S. A., & Otero, V. K. (2018). Development of pedagogical knowledge among learning assistants. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vygotksy, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, J.-S. S., Van Dusen, B., & Roualdes, E. A. (2016, July 20–21). The impacts of learning assistants on student learning of physics [Paper presentation]. Physics Education Research Conference, Sacramento, CA, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W. B. (2009). Innovations in teaching undergraduate biology and why we need them. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 25(1), 93–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar