References
- Andrelo, R. (2013). The educational potential of radio language. Comunicação Midiática, 8(1), 176–197. https://www2.faac.unesp.br/comunicacaomidiatica/index.php/CM/article/view/255
- Dudo, A. (2015). Scientists, the media, and the public communication of science. Sociology Compass, 9(9), 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12298
- Ferreira, L. N. A., & Queiroz, S. L. (2011). Ciência Hoje articles as a didactic tool in chemistry teaching. Química Nova, 34(2), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-40422011000200033
- Goldman, T. (2018). The impact of podcasts in education. Advanced Writing: Pop Culture Intersections, 29. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/engl_176/29
- Hartings, M. R., & Fahy, D. (2011). Communicating chemistry for public engagement. Nature Chemistry, 3(9), 674–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1094
- Lancor, R., & Schiebel, A. (2018). Science and community engagement: Connecting science students with the community. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(4), 36–41.
- Lindgren, M. (2016). Personal narrative journalism. The Radio Journal—International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 14(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.14.1.23_1
- MacKenzie, L. E. (2019). Science podcasts: Analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018. Royal Society Open Science, 6(180932), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180932
- McLeish, R. (2005). Radio production (5th ed.). Focal Press/Elsevier.
- Murcott, T. H. L. (2009). Science journalism: Toppling the priesthood. Nature, 459, 1054–1055. https://doi.org/10.1038/4591054a
- National Science Teaching Association. (2011). NSTA position statement: Quality science education and 21st-century skills. https://static.nsta.org/pdfs/PositionStatement_21stCentury.pdf
- Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. (2005). Podcast. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/podcast
- Pérez, D. G., Montoro, I. F., Alís, J. C., Cachapuz, A., & Praia, J. (2001). Para uma imagem não deformada do trabalho científico. Ciência & Educação, 7(2), 125–153.
- Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. https://globaled.gse.harvard.edu/files/geii/files/framework_guide_v2.pdf
- Sotério, C., Silva, G. B., & Queiroz, S. L. (2019). Comunicação científica no ensino superior: estratégias na área de ciências naturais. Proceedings of the XVII Evento de Educação em Química, 17, 1–10.
- Train, T. L., & Miyamoto, Y. J. (2017). Encouraging science communication in an undergraduate curriculum improves students’ perceptions and confidence. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(4), 76–83.
- Trautmann, N. M. (2009). Designing peer review for pedagogical success. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(4), 14–19.
- Tuten, H., & Temesvari, L. (2013). Popular science journalism? Facilitating learning through peer review and communication of science news. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(4), 46–50.
- van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Compton, J. (2020). Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 566790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790
- Vicente, E. (2002). Gêneros e formatos radiofônicos. Núcleo de Comunicação e Educação NCE-ECA/USP. http://www.usp.br/nce/wcp/arq/textos/61.pdf
- Warhurst, S., Mccabe, P., & Madill, C. (2013). What makes a good voice for radio: Perceptions of radio employers and educators. Journal of Voice, 27(2), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.08.010