Double Poverty: Class, Employment Type, Gender and Time Poor Precarious Workers in the South Korean Service Economy

References

• Ǻs, D. 1978. “Studies of Time-use: Problems and Prospects.” Acta Sociologica 21 (2): 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. 1984. “Manpower Strategies for Flexible Organisations.” Personnel Management 16 (8): 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, S. 2014. “Class and Precarious Work in Korean Service Economy.” Korean Social Policy Review 21 (2): 57–90 [in Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Baek, S., and S. Lee. 2014. “Changes in Economic Activity. Skills and Inequality in the Service Economy.” Development and Society 43 (1): 33–57 [in Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Bardasi, E., and Q. Wodon. 2006. “Measuring Time Poverty and Analysing Its Determinants: Concepts and Application to Guinea.” Economics Bulletin 10 (12): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bardasi, E., and Q. Wodon. 2010. “Working Long Hours and Having No Choice: Time Poverty in Guinea.” Feminist Economics 16 (3): 45–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. 1965. “A Theory of the Allocation of Time.” The Economic Journal 75 (299): 493–517..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, B. 1974. “Occupational Segregation, Wages and Profits When Employers Discriminate by Race or Sex.” Eastern Economic Journal 1 (2): 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Bittman, M. 1999. Social Participation and Family Welfare: The Money and Time Cost of Leisure. Sydney: UNSW Social Policy Research Centre Discussion Paper 95.
   Google Scholar
• Bittman, M. 2002. “Social Participation and Family Welfare: The Money and Time Costs of Leisure in Australia.” Social Policy & Administration 36 (4): 408–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. 2007. “Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks, and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (5): 495–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratberg, E., S. Dahl, and A. Risa. 2002. “The Double Burden: Do Combinations of Career and Family Obligations Increase Sickness Absence among Women?” European Sociological Review 18 (2): 233–249..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchardt, T. 2008. Time and Income Poverty. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion London School of Economics CASE Reports Case Report 57.
   Google Scholar
• Chatzitheochari, S., and S. Arber. 2012. “Class, Gender and Time Poverty: A Time-use Analysis of British Workers’ Free Time Resources.” British Journal of Sociology 63 (3): 451–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doeringer, P., and M. Piore. 1971. Internal Labour Markets and Manpower Analysis. New York: DC Heath and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Douthitt, R. 2000. “Time to Do the Chores? Factoring Home-Production Needs into Measures of Poverty.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues 21 (1): 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. 2010. “What Would Veblen Wear?” Leisure Sciences 32 (3): 295–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P., S. Häusermann, B. Palier, and M. Seelieb-Kaiser. 2012. The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evan, J., and E. Gibbs. 2009. Moving from Precarious Employment to Decent Work. Geneva: International Labour Organisation Discussion Paper 13.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. 2000. On Sociology: Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R., J. Rice, A. Parpo, and L. Eriksson. 2008. Discretionary Time: A New Measure of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R., J. Rice, M. Bittman, and P. Saunders. 2005. “The Time-pressure Illusion: Discretionary Time vs Free Time.” Social Indicators Research 73 (1): 43–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, H. 1979. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union?” Capital & Class 3 (2) 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A., and A. Mukhopadhyay. 2007. “When Twenty-Four Hours is Not Enough: Time Poverty of Working Parents.” Social Indicators Research 82 (1): 57–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyclak, T., G. Johnes, R. Thornton. 2004. Fundamentals of Labour Economics. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin College.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. 2011. From Precarious Work to Decent Work: Policies and Regulations to Combat Precarious Employment. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. 2012. From Precarious Work to Decent Work: Outcome Document to the Workers’ Symposium on Policies and Regulations to Combat Precarious Employment. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Jessoula, M., P. Graziano, and I. Madama. 2010. “Selective Flexicurity in Segmented Labour Markets: The Case of Italian Mid-siders.” Journal of Social Policy 39 (4): 561–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, E. 2015. “Wage Inequality in Korea in Comparative Perspective.” Korean Journal of Sociology 49 (4): 65–100 [in Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Kalenkoski, C. and K. Hamrick. 2013. “How Does Time Poverty Affect Behavior? A Look at Eating and Physical Activity.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 35 (1): 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalenkoski, C., K. Hamrick and M. Andrews. 2011. “Time Poverty Thresholds and Rates for the US Population.” Social Indicators Research 104 (1): 129–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. 2000. “Nonstandard Employment Relations: Part-time, Temporary and Contract Work.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 341–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. 2003. “Flexible Firms and Labour Market Segmentation.” Work and Occupations 30 (2): 154–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. 2009. “Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition.” American Sociological Review 74 (1): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A., and K. Hewison. 2013. “Precarious Work and the Challenge for Asia.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (3): 271–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A., K. Hewison, and K. Shin. 2021. Precarious Asia: Global Capitalism and Work in Japan, South Korea, and Indonesia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kes, A., and H. Swamiethan. 2006. “Gender and Time Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Gender, Time Use, and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa, edited by C. Blackden and Q. Wodon, 13–32. Washington, DC: World Bank Working Paper 73.
   Google Scholar
• KIET. 2020. Key Indicators of Major Industries. Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade 16 (2) [in Korean]. Accessd November 13, 2021. https://www.kiet.re.kr/trends/pointerList.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., and N. Lee. 2018. “From Gender Disparity to Gender Justice – Patriarchal Welfare System and Transformative Alternatives.” Korean Journal of Social Welfare 70 (2): 7–33 [in Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2013. 2014 Minimum Cost of Living 1.63 Million Won, 5.5% Increase [in Korean]. Accessed December 8, 2021. http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=289337&page=641.
   Google Scholar
• Kroon, B., and J. Paauwe. 2013. “Structuration of Precarious Employment in Economically Constrained Firms: The Case of Dutch Agriculture.” Human Resource Management Journal 24 (1): 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H., Y. Kim, and H. Kwon. 2015. “Durable Gender Inequality in the Growing Low-wage Service Economy.” Economy and Society 107: 44–78 [in Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2011. “The Shift of Labour Market Risks in Deindustrializing Taiwan, Japan, and Korea.” Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 10 (2): 241–269.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2012. “Labour Market Risk Shifts in 18 Post-industrial Economies: An Application of Fuzzy-set Ideal Type Approach.” Korea Social Policy Review 20 (3): 47–76 [in Korean].
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2016. “Institutional Legacy of State Corporatism in De-industrial Labour Markets: A Comparative Study of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.” Socio-Economic Review 14 (1): 73–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., and Y. Kim. 2020. “Female Outsiders in South Korea’s Dual Labour Market: Challenges of Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value.” Journal of Industrial Relations 62 (4): 651–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindbeck, A., and D. Snower. 1988. “Cooperation, Harassment, and Involuntary Unemployment: An Insider-Outsider Approach.” The American Economic Review 78 (1): 167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021a. Hours Worked (indicator). Paris: OECD. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://data.oecd.org/emp/hours-worked.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021b. Wage Levels (indicator). Paris: OECD. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://data.oecd.org/earnwage/wage-levels.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021c. Employment: Time Spent in Paid and Unpaid Work by Sex (indicator). Paris: OECD. Accessed December 4, 2021. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=54757.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. 2003. “Labour Market Trends and the Goldthorpe Class Schema: A Conceptual Reassessment.” Swiss Journal of Sociology 29 (2): 241–262.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. 2006. Redrawing the Class Map: Stratification and Institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. 2008. “Remodelling Class to Make Sense of Service Employment: Evidence for Britain and Germany.” Paper, CREST-ENSAE Seminar on Sociology, Paris, November 20.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, M., D. Gordon, and R. Edwards. 1973. “Dual Labour Markets: A Theory of Labour Market Segmentation.” The American Economic Review 63 (2): 359–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. 2008. “Introduction: Revisiting the Feminism and Basic Income Debate?” Basic Income Studies: An International Journal of Basic Income Research 3 (3): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, G., and J. Rodgers. 1989. Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Schauer, J. 2018. Labour Market Duality in Korea. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund Working Papers 2018/126.
   Google Scholar
• Schwander, H., and S. Häusermann. 2013. “Who is In and Who is Out? A Risk-based Conceptualisation of Insiders and Outsiders.” Journal of European Social Policy 23 (3): 248–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2012. “The Precariat: From Denizens to Citizens?” Polity 44 (4): 588–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. 2004. New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuya, N., L. Bumpass, and M. Choe. 2000. “Gender, Employment, and Housework in Japan, South Korea, and the United States.” Review of Population and Social Policy 9 (9): 195–220.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions. New York: B. W. Huebsch.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T., and J. Galbraith. 1973. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, C. 1977. “The Time-Poor: A New Look at Poverty.” Journal of Human Resources 12 (1): 27–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosko, L. 2006. Precarious Employment: Understanding Labour Market Insecurity in Canada. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, T. 2003. “Class-and Gender-based Working Time? Time Poverty and the Division of Domestic Labour.” Sociology 37 (4): 733–752.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. 1989. The Debate on Classes. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y., and H. Chung. 2016. “New Forms of Dualization? Labour Market Segmentation Patterns in the UK from the late 90s until the Post-crisis in the Late 2000s.” Social Indicators Research 128 (2): 609–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilenawela, A. 2013. “Women’s Time Poverty: Differences by Family Structure, Employment, and Gender Ideology.” Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar