The Origins of Collaborative Governance in South Korea: An Analysis of the First Ten Years after Democratisation

References

• Agrawal, A. and M. Lemos. 2007. “A Greener Revolution in The Making? Environmental Governance in the 21st Century.” Environment 49 (5): 36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practices.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardach, E. 1998. Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C. 1993. Critical Theories of the State: Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Post-Marxist. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S and A. Hindmoor. 2009. Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrini-Feyerabend, G. 1996. Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to The Context. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, D. 2008. “The State and International Development Management: Shifting Tides, Changing Boundaries, and Future Directions.” Public Administration Review 68 (6): 985–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., B. Crosby, and M. Stone. 2015. “Designing and Implementing Cross-sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging.” Public Administration Review 75 (5): 647–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. 2014. Resilience: The Governance of Complexity. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2009. “Collaborative Governance in Welfare Service Delivery: Focusing on Local Welfare System in Korea.” International Review of Public Administration 13 (sup. 1): 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. and J. Bryson. 2010. “Integrative Leadership and the Creation and Maintenance of Cross-Sector Collaborations.” Leadership Quarterly 21 (2): 211–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doberstein, C. 2016. “Designing Collaborative Governance Designing-Making in Search of a Collaborative Advantage.” Public Management Review 18 (6): 819–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. and E.-H. Klijn. 2006. “Managing Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Six Interactive Process in Netherlands.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 417–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh. 2012. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (1): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, G. and K. Smith. 2003. The Public Administration Theory Primer. Cambridge: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2015. “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future.” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, J. 2000. “Can Agencies Work Together? Collaboration in Public and Nonprofit Organizations.” Public Administration Review 60 (3): 275–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, T. 2011. “An Analysis of the Central Government Organization in the First Half of the Kim Young Sam Government.” Journal of Korean Policy Studies 11 (2): 367–402 (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Han, C. and S. Kim. 2017. “The Changing Modes of Administrative Reform in South Korea.” Transylvania Review of Administrative Sciences 50 (E/2017): 54–72.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. 1993. “Collaborative Capability: An Intra-Organizational Perspective on Collaborative Advantage.” Public Money & Management 13 (3): 21–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. and D. Macdonald. 1992. “Introducing Collaborative Advantage: Achieving Inter-Organized Effectiveness through Meta-Strategy.” Management Decision 30 (3): 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H. 2008. “Administrative Reform.” In Sixty Years of Korean Public Administration: State Governance, edited by Korea Institute of Public Administration, 455–488. Paju: Beopmun Publishing (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., D. Mazmanian, and S. Tang. 2009. “Collaborative Governance in the United States and Korea: Cases in Negotiated Policymaking and Service Delivery.” International Review of Public Administration 13 (sup 1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 2000. The Politics of Democratization in Korea: The Role of Civil Society. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 2010. “Collaborative Governance in South Korea: Citizen Participation in Policy Making and Welfare Service Provision.” Asian Perspective 34 (3): 165–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. and C. Han. 2015. “Administrative Reform in South Korea: New Public Management and the Bureaucracy.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81 (4): 694–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T. 2014. “The Contents of Governments.” In Roh Tae Woo Government, edited by Korea Institute of Public Administration, 250–280. Seoul: Daeyeongmunhwasa Publishing (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. 2008. “Governance and Governance Networks in Europe: An Assessment of Ten Years of Research on the Theme.” Public Management Review 10 (4): 505–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korea Institute of Public Administration. 2015. The Korean Government: Policies and Administration. Seoul: Daeyoungmoonwhasa Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. 2000. “The Failure of the Weak State in Economic Liberalization: Liberalization, Democratization and the Financial Crisis in South Korea.” Pacific Review 13 (1): 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, M. 1988. States, War and Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. and P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., M. Smith, and D. Richards. 2000. “Bureaucrats, Politicians and Reform in Whitehall: Analysing the Bureau-Shaping Model.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (3): 461–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. 2010. “Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: Exploring the Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration.” American Review of Public Administration 40 (4): 376–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 1974. “Structural Problems of the Capitalist State: Class Rule and the Political System. On the Selectiveness of Political Institutions.” In German Political Studies, Volume I, edited by V. Beyme, 31–54. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. 2009. “Reinventing Governance, Reinventing Democracy?” Policy & Politics 37 (4): 591–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. and B.G. Peters. 2020. Governance, Politics and the State. London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 1994. “The Hollowing Out of the State: The Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain.” Political Quarterly 65 (12): 138–151.
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, C. and N. O’Mahony. 2013. “Frustrations in Collaborative Working: Insights from Institutional Theory.” Public Management Review 15 (1): 83–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., J. Scholz, M. Lubell, D. Mindruta, and M. Edwardsen. 2003. “Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. and C. Thomas. 2017. “Unpacking the Collaborative Toolbox: Why and When Do Public Managers Choose Collaborative Governance Strategies?” Policy Studies Journal 45 (1): 191–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, M. 2013. Logics of Legitimacy: Three Traditions of Public Administration Practice. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1): 369–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholen, B. 2015. “Citizen Participation and Bureaucratization: The Participatory Turn Seen Through a Weberian Lens.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81 (3): 585–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zifcak, S. 1994. New Managerialism: Administrative Reform in Whitehall and Canberra. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar