Contextualizing founder identity in coworking spaces

References

• Aldrich, H. E. (2014). The democratization of entrepreneurship? Hackers, makerspaces, and crowdfunding. Annual meeting of the academy of management, Philadelphia, PA. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1371.6162
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2014). Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations (pp. 93–117). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M. M., Bouncken, R., & Görmar, L. (2021). The role of sociomaterial assemblage on entrepreneurship in coworking-spaces. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(8), 2028–2049. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2021-0564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R., Sauer, P. L., & Young, M. (1995). Composite reliability in structural equations modeling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. R., Bird, B. J., Singh, S. et al. (2011). The practical intelligence of entrepreneurs: Antecedents and a link with new venture growth. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednář, P., Danko, L., & Smékalová, L. (2021). Coworking spaces and creative communities: Making resilient coworking spaces through knowledge sharing and collective learning. European Planning Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1944065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, B. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2021). Helping entrepreneurs help themselves: A review and relational research agenda on entrepreneurial support organizations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 10422587211028736, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211028736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilandzic, M., & Foth, M. (2013). Libraries as co-working spaces: Understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning. Library Hi Tech, 31(2), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogazzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of strucutral equation models. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Boje, D. (2008). Storytelling organizations. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Pearl, J. (2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 301–328). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live (pp. 1–309).
   Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B. (2018). University coworking-spaces: Mechanisms, examples, and suggestions for entrepreneurial universities. International Journal of Technology Management, 77(NoSuppl. 1/2/3), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2018.091709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., & Aslam, M. M. (2019). Understanding knowledge exchange processes among diverse users of coworking-spaces. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(10), 2067–2085. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2018-0316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., & Aslam, M. M. (in press). Bringing the design perspective to coworking-spaces: Constitutive entanglement of actors and artifacts. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Brem, A. (2019). Permeability in coworking-spaces as an innovation facilitator. In 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893737
   Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Qiu, Y. (2020). Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 64(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Reuschl, A. J. (2018). The dark side of entrepreneurship in coworking-spaces. In A. T. Porcar & D. R (Eds.), Inside the mind of the entrepreneur (pp. 135–147). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R., Ratzmann, M., Barwinski, R., & Kraus, S. (2020). Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 114, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., & Reuschl, A. J. (2018). Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R., & Tiberius, V. (2021). Legitimacy processes and trajectories of co-prosumption services: insights from coworking spaces. Journal of Service Research, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705211050208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bounken, R. B., & Qiu, Y. (in press). Co-working-ecosystems: Institutionalization of ‘homes’ for innovation and venturing. In Companion to technology management. Ed. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, N. M., & Nowell, B. (2014). Psychological sense of community: A new construct for the field of management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492613491433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigham, K. H., Lumpkin, G. T., Payne, G. T., & Zachary, M. A. (2014). Researching long-term orientation: A validation study and recommendations for future research. Family Business Review, 27(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513508980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R. A. (1984). Designs for corporate entrepreneurship in established firms. California Management Review, 26(3), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs, S. M., & Eby, L. T. (1998). Psychological sense of community at work: A measurement system and explanatory framework. Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), 509–532. h ttps://d oi.org/1 0.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199811)26:6<509::AID-JCOP1>3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, T. (2018). Learning everyday entrepreneurial practices through coworking. Management Learning, 49(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507618757088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, V., & Winden, W. V. (2020). The promise of coworking environments: A content analysis of the positioning of collaborative workspaces in amsterdam. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 40(3), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2020.107804
   Google Scholar
• Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H. (1993). Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(5), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90021-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah, S., & Yuen-Ping, H. (2019). Coworking and sustainable business model innovation in young firms. Sustainability, 11(10), 2959. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, N., Fuzi, A., & Loudon, G. (2019). Coworking in the digital economy: Context, motivations, and outcomes. Futures, 135, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, M., McMullen, J. S., Bergman, B. J., Jr, & York, J. G. (2018). Category membership, identity control, and the reevaluation of prosocial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 16(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
   Google Scholar
• Cuérel, M., Loots, E., & Lavanga, M. (2019). Not from but in the same organization: cooperation, collaboration, and competition in creative coworking spaces. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 5, 132–156. http://www.journalcbi.com/uploads/3/1/8/7/31878681/not_from_but_in_the_same_organization_cooperation_collaboration_and_competition_in_creative_coworking_spaces_by_maulde_cu%C3%A9rel_ellen_loots_mariangela_lavanga.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de la Cruz, E., Marina, J., Verdú, A. J., & Gras, J. M. G. (2018). Influence of the entrepreneur’s social identity on business performance through effectuation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeGuzman, G. V., & Tang, A. I. (2011). Working in the unoffice: A guide to coworking for indie workers, small businesses, and nonprofits. Night Owls Press LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Estrada-Cruz, M., Verdú-Jover, A. J., Gómez-Gras, J. M., & Martinez, J. M. (2019). Entrepreneurial social identity and stakeholders: The socio-economic implications. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 14(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-10-2019-0103
   Google Scholar
• Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: the role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. F. (2019). To be or not to be digital, that is the question: firm innovation and performance. Journal of Business Research, 101, 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B. C., Simsek, Z., & Heavey, C. (in press). Top management team experiential variety, competitive repertoires, and firm performance: examining the law of requisite variety in the 3d printing industry (1986-2017). Academy of Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foy, S. E., & Gruber, M. (2021). Identity-society (mis)alignment and the instrumentalization of firm creation: creative destruction and creative reconstruction. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuzi, A. (2015). Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantert, T. M., Fredrich, V., Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2022). The moral foundations of makerspaces as unconventional sources of innovation: a study of narratives and performance. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1564–1574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M., & Bacevice, P. A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: the emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6), 821–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauger, F., Pfnür, A., & Strych, J.-O. (2021). Coworking spaces and start-ups: empirical evidence from a product market competition and life cycle perspective. Journal of Business Research, 132, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M., Sandulli, F. D., & Bogers, M. (2020). Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms. Research Policy, 49(10), 104049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. A. (2019). The mission of community and the promise of collective action. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, M. A., & Navis, C. (2013). Categories, identities, and cultural classification: moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124–1137. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görmar, L., Barwinski, R., Bouncken, R., & Laudien, S. (2021). Co-creation in coworking-spaces: Boundary conditions of diversity. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1740627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, M. G. (2018). The pivot: how founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1692–1717. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2017). Entrepreneurial behavior: a reconceptualization and extension based on identity theory. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.5465/256729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, R., & Schwery, M. (2020). Lean startup: operationalizing lean startup capability and testing its performance implications. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(1), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1659677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinzel, V., Georgiades, S., & Engstler, M. (2021). Corporate coworking – a catalyst for collaboration, creativity, and innovation. in M. Orel, O. Dvouletý, & V. Ratten (Eds.), The flexible workplace: coworking and other modern workplace transformations (pp. 81–96). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, H., & Gimeno, J. (2010). Becoming a founder: how founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23(6), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, T. (2022). Coworking spaces: an overview and research agenda. Research Policy, 51(2), 104447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hult, G., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M., & Brown, A. D. (2002). Narratives of organizational identity and identification: a case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies, 23(3), 421–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602233005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, P., & Roberts, P. W. (2000). Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 387–423. https://doi.org/10.1086/316965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, J., Malchow-Møller, N., & Sørensen, A. (2016). Success in entrepreneurship: a complementarity between schooling and wage-work experience. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9732-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambil, A., Eselius, E. D., & Monteiro, K. A. (2000). Fast venturing: The quick way to start web businesses. MIT Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 55.
   Google Scholar
• Ketokivi, M., & McIntosh, C. N. (2017). Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Operations Management, 52(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiani, A., Ali, A., Biraglia, A., & Wang, D. (2021). Why i persist while others leave? Investigating the path from passion to persistence in entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1938097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopplin, C. S., Gantert, T. M., & Maier, J. V. (2021). Acceptance of matchmaking tools in coworking spaces: an extended perspective. Review of Managerial Science, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00498-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krackhardt, D. (1992). A caveat on the use of the quadratic assignment procedure. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 3(4), 279–296. https://www.bebr.ufl.edu/sites/default/files/Krackhardt%20-%201992%20-%20A%20caveat%20on%20the%20use%20of%20the%20quadratic%20assignment%20pr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S., Bouncken, R. B., Görmar, L., González-Serrano, M. H., & Calabuig, F. (2022). Coworking spaces and makerspaces: mapping the state of research. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(1), 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C.-S., Chiu, C.-J., Yang, C.-F., & Pai, D.-C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: the mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0433-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashani, E., & Zacher, H. (2021). Do we have a match? Assessing the role of community in coworking spaces based on a person-environment fit framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(225). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leforestier, A. (2009). The co-working space concept. Indian Institute of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, R., Niemand, T., & Kraus, S. (2021). A tailored-fit model evaluation strategy for better decisions about structural equation models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias, B. D., McCann, B. T., & Whitman, D. S. (2021). A meta-analysis of agglomeration and venture performance: firm-level evidence. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(3), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, A. L., & Lévesque, M. (2014). Trustworthiness: A critical ingredient for entrepreneurs seeking investors. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1057–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenny, A. F., Aguinis, H., Short, J. C., & Anglin, A. H. (2018). What doesn’t get measured does exist: improving the accuracy of computer-aided text analysis. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2909–2933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316657594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenny, A. F., & Short, J. C. (2012). http://www.amckenny.com/CATScanner/
   Google Scholar
• Mora-Valentin, E. M., Montoro-Sanchez, A., & Guerras-Martin, L. A. (2004). Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, 33(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00087-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T. W., Renko, M., Block, E., & Meyskens, M. (2018). Funding the story of hybrid ventures: Crowdfunder lending preferences and linguistic hybridity. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.0361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbery, R., Lean, J., Moizer, J., & Haddoud, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial identity formation during the initial entrepreneurial experience: the influence of simulation feedback and existing identity. Journal of Business Research, 85, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E. S. (1999). “Order from chaos: applications of narrative theories andmethods to organizational research,” Academy of management proceedings & membership directory, A1–A6. Chicago, IL: Publisher Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Orel, M. (2019). Coworking environments and digital nomadism: balancing work and leisure whilst on the move. World Leisure Journal, 61(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2019.1639275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pidduck, R. J., & Clark, D. R. (2021). Transitional entrepreneurship: elevating research into marginalized entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(6), 1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1928149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, E. E., & Baker, T. (2017). In the beginning: identity processes and organizing in multi-founder nascent ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2381–2414. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 69(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rese, A., Görmar, L., & Herbig, A. (2021). Social networks in coworking spaces and individual coworker’s creativity. Review of Managerial Science, 16(2), 391–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00445-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives: examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109332834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2020). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, A. C., Yavorsky, J. E., & Sandoval, R. G. (2021). Organizational logic in coworking spaces: inequality regimes in the new economy. Gender & Society, 35(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220974691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarooghi, H., Sunny, S., Hornsby, J., & Fernhaber, S. (2019). Design thinking and entrepreneurship education: where are we, and what are the possibilities? Journal of Small Business Management, 57(sup1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2017). Researching at the intersection of innovation, operations management, and entrepreneurship. In Trailblazing in entrepreneurship (pp. 103–147). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2012). Properties of persons and situations related to overall and distinctive personality-behavior congruence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B. (2007). The application of diction to content analysis research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 1094428107304534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107304534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Lumpkin, G. T., & Broberg, J. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: a comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review, 22(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486508327823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieger, P., Gruber, M., Fauchart, E., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Measuring the social identity of entrepreneurs: scale development and international validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 542–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soublière, J.-F., & Gehman, J. (2020). The legitimacy threshold revisited: How prior successes and failures spill over to other endeavors on kickstarter. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 472–502. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C., Bodrožić, Z., Scaratti, G., & Ivaldi, S. (2019). “Coworking is about community”: But what is “community” in coworking? Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(2), 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918816357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: the moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.30744031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: a social structural version. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, Henri, Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 56–65).
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.2307/258398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidaillet, B., & Bousalham, Y. (2020). Coworking spaces as places where economic diversity can be articulated: towards a theory of syntopia. Organization, 27(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418794003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wales, W. J., Gupta, V. K., & Mousa, F.-T. (2013). Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: an assessment and suggestions for future research. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 31(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611418261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters-Lynch, J., & Duff, C. (2021). The affective commons of coworking. Human Relations, 74(3), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719894633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters-Lynch, J., & Potts, J. (2017). The social economy of coworking spaces: a focal point model of coordination. Review of Social Economy, 75(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2016.1269938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., Hartman, N., & Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: a review and comprehensive cfa marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 477–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110366036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimating nascent collective identities: coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22(2), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: the moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93–113. h ttps//d oi.org/1 0.1002/smj.2589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309335187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. (2007). Stories and the discursive dynamics of institutional entrepreneurship: the case of israeli high-tech after the bubble. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1035–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar