Further comparison of faecal egg count reduction test procedures: Sensitivity and specificity

References

• Coles , GC , Jackson , F , Pomroy , WE , Prichard , RK , Samson-Himmelstjerna , G von , Silvestre , A , Taylor , MA and Vercruysse , J . 2006 . The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance . Veterinary Parasitology , 136 : 167 – 85 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen , MV . 1989 . An evaluation of techniques used for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of domestic livestock . Veterinary Research Communications , 13 : 455 – 66 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna , PB . 1990 . The detection of anthelmintic resistance by the faecal egg count reduction test: An examination of some of the factors affecting performance and interpretation . New Zealand Veterinary Journal , 38 : 142 – 7 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna , PB . 1994 . Criteria for diagnosing anthelmintic resistance by the faecal egg count reduction test . New Zealand Veterinary Journal , 42 : 153 – 4 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna , PB . 2005 . Practicalities of drench resistance testing . VetScript , 18 (10) : 10 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• McKenna , PB . 2006 . A comparison of faecal egg count reduction test procedures . New Zealand Veterinary Journal , 54 : 202 – 3 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor , MA , Hunt , KR and Goodyear , KL . 2002 . Anthelmintic resistance detection methods . Veterinary Parasitology , 103 : 183 – 94 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar