Positive animal welfare states and encouraging environment-focused and animal-to-animal interactive behaviours

References

• Balcombe JP. Laboratory environments and rodents’ behavioural needs: A review. Laboratory Animals 40, 217–35, 2006 doi: 10.1258/002367706777611488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcombe JP. Animal pleasure and its moral significance. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118, 208–16, 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Beaver BV. Chapter 4 - Canine social behavior; Chapter 7 - Canine ingestive behavior. In: Canine Behavior: Insights and Answers. 2nd Edtn. Pp 133–92 and 223–42. Saunders Elsevier, St Louis, USA, 2009
   Google Scholar
• Bergvall UA, Leimar O. Plant secondary compounds and the frequency of food types affect food choice in herbivores. Ecology 86, 2450–60, 2005 doi: 10.1890/04-0978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergvall UA, Schapers A, Kjellander P, Weiss A. Personality and foraging decisions in fellow deer, Dama dama. Animal Behaviour 81, 101–212, 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge KC. Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 20, 1–25, 1996 doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(95)00033-B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge KC, Robinson TE. Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences 9, 507–13, 2003 doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00233-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boissy A, Dumont B. Interactions between social and feeding motivations on the grazing behaviour of herbivores: Sheep more easily split into subgroups with familiar peers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79, 233–45, 2002 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00152-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, Winckler C, Forkman B, Dimitrov I, Langbein J, et al. Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiology and Behavior 92, 375–97, 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brando SICA. Advances in husbandry training in marine mammal care programs. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 23, 777–91, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Broad KD, Curley JP, Keverne EB. Mother-infant bonding and the evolution of mammalian social relationships. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361, 2199–214, 2006 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broom DM. Cognitive ability and awareness in domestic animals and decisions about obligations to animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 126, 1–11, 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgdorf J, Panksepp J. The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 30, 173–87, 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro TM, Graham CM, Stoner CJ, Vargas JK. Adaptive significance of antipredator behaviour in artiodactyls. Animal Behaviour 67, 205–28, 2004 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2002.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter CS, Keverne EB. The neurobiology of social affiliation and pair bonding. Hormones, Brain and Behavior 1, 299–337, 2002 doi: 10.1016/B978-012532104-4/50006-8
   Google Scholar
• Cooke BM, Shukla D. Double helix: Reciprocity between juvenile play and brain development. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 1, 459–70, 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzi A, Sighieri C, Gazzano A, Nichol CJ, Baragli P. Post-conflict friendly reunion in a permanent group of horses (Equus caballus). Behavioural Processes 85, 185–290, 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushing BS, Kramer KM. Mechanisms underlying epigenetic effects of early social experience: The role of neuropeptides and steroids. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 29, 1089–105, 2005 doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins MS. Battery hens name their price: Consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological “needs”. Animal Behaviour 31, 1195–205, 1983 doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80026-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins MS. Through the eyes of animals: What behaviour tells us. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100, 4–10, 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dawkins MS. Why Animals Matter: Animal Consciousness, Animal Welfare, and Human Well-being. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Day JEL, Kyriazakis I, Lawrence AB. The effect of food deprivation on the expression of foraging and exploratory behaviour in the growing pig. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42, 193–206, 1995 doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)93889-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deag JM. Behavioural ecology and the welfare of extensively farmed animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49, 9–22, 1996 doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00663-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dickman CR. Rodent-ecosystem relationships: A review. In: Singleton GR, Hinds LA, Leirs H, Zhang Z (eds). Ecologically-Based Management of Rodent Pests, ACIAR Monograph 59. Pp 113–133. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Dumont B, Boissy A. Grazing behaviour of sheep in a situation of conflict between feeding and social motivations. Behavioural Processes 49, 131–8, 2000 doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00082-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan IJH. Science-based assessment of animal welfare: Farm animals. Scientific and Technical Review, Office International des Epizooties 24, 483–92, 2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan IJH, Petherick JC. The implications of cognitive processes for animal welfare. Journal of Animal Science 69, 5017–22, 1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrell JL, Beattie VE, Sneddon IA, Kilpatrick D. Pre-mixing as a technique for facilitating subgroup formation and reducing sow aggression in large dynamic groups. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84, 89–99, 2003 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Edwards LN. Animal well-being and behavioural needs on the farm. In: Grandin T (ed). Improving Animal Welfare: A Practical Approach. Pp 139–59. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Fisher HE, Aron A, Brown LL. Romantic love: A mammalian brain system for mate choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 361, 2173–86, 2006 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser D. Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: The interplay of science and values. Animal Welfare 12, 433–43, 2003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fraser D. Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in its Cultural Context. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2008
   Google Scholar
• Fraser D, Duncan IJH. “Pleasures”, “pains” and animal welfare: Toward a natural history of affect. Animal Welfare 7, 383–96, 1998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green TC, Mellor DJ. Extending ideas about animal welfare assessment to include “quality of life” and related concepts. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 59, 316–24, 2011 doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.610283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen K, Broom DM. Cattle discriminate between individual familiar herd members in a learning experiment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82, 13–28, 2003 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00053-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howery LD, Provenza FD, Banner RE, Scott CB. Differences in home range and habitat use among individuals in a cattle herd. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49, 305–20, 1996 doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01059-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes BO, Duncan IJH. The notion of ethological “need”, models of motivation and animal welfare. Animal Behaviour 36, 1696–707, 1988 doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80110-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulet CV, Anderson DM, Smith JN, Shupe WL, Taylor Jr CA, Murray LW. Bonding of goats to sheep and cattle for protection from predators. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22, 261–7, 1989 doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(89)90021-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemoto S, Panksepp J. The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: A unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Research Reviews 31, 6–41, 1999 doi: 10.1016/S0165-0173(99)00023-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kiley-Worthington M. Equine psychological needs and quality of life. In: McIlwraith CW, Rollin BE (eds). Equine Welfare. Pp 94–112. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Kirkden RD, Pajor EA. Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animals’ feelings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100, 29–47, 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruuk H, Turner M. Comparative notes on predation by lion, leopard, cheetah and wild dog in the Serengeti area, East Africa. Mammalia 31, 1–27, 1967 doi: 10.1515/mamm.1967.31.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Kuczaj S, Lacinak T, Fad O, Throne M, Solangi M, Ramos J. Keeping environmental enrichment enriching. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 15, 127–37, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Lim MM, Young LJ. Neuropeptidergic regulation of affiliative behavior and social bonding in animals. Hormones and Behavior 50, 506–17, 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lynch JJ, Hinch GN, Adams DB. Grazing behaviour of sheep. In: The Behaviour of Sheep: Biological Principles and Implications for Production. Pp 9–47. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, and CSIRO Publications, Melbourne, Australia, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Mason G. Species difference in responses to captivity: Stress, welfare and the comparative method. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25, 713–21, 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mason G, Rushen J. Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Implications for Animal Welfare. 2nd Edtn. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Mason G, Clubb R, Latham N, Vickery S. Why and how should we use environmental enrichment to tackle stereotypic behaviour? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102, 163–88, 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehan CL, Millam JR, Mench JA. Foraging opportunity and increased physical complexity both prevent and reduce psychogenic feather picking by young Amazon parrots. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80, 71–85, 2003 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00192-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor DJ. Animal emotions, behaviour and the promotion of positive welfare states. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 60, 1–8, 2012 doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.619047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor DJ. Enhancing animal welfare by creating opportunities for “positive affective engagement”. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 63, 3–8, 2015a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor DJ. Positive animal welfare states and reference standards for welfare assessment. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 63, 9–16, 2015b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ. Integrating practical, regulatory and ethical strategies for enhancing farm animal welfare. Australian Veterinary Journal 79, 762–8, 2001 doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10895.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor DJ, Stafford KJ. Animal welfare implications of neonatal mortality and morbitity in farm animals. The Veterinary Journal 168, 118–33, 2004 doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2003.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mellor DJ, Patterson-Kane E, Stafford KJ. The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Pp 3–94. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2009
   Google Scholar
• *Mellor DJ, Diesch TJ, Johnson CB. Should mammalian fetuses be excluded from regulations protecting animals during experiments? Alternatives to Animal Experimentation (ALTEX) 27 (Special Issue), 199–202, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Mendl M, Paul ES. Do animals live in the present? Current evidence and implications for welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113, 357–82, 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettke-Hofmann C, Winkler H, Leisler B. The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots. Ethology 108, 249–72, 2002 doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mill DS, Charchant-Forde JN, McGreevy P, Morton DB, Nicol CJ, Phillips CJC, Sandoe P, Swaisgood RR. Affiliation. In: The Encyclopedia of Applied Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Pp 5–7. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Morton DB, Griffiths PH. Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Veterinary Record 116, 431–6, 1985 doi: 10.1136/vr.116.16.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray DL, Boutin S, O'Donoghue M, Nams VO. Hunting behaviour of a sympatric felid and canid in relation to vegetative cover. Animal Behaviour 50, 1203–10, 1995 doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80037-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson E, Panksepp J. Brain substrates of infant–mother attachment: Contributions of opioids, oxytocin, and norepinepherine. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 22, 437–52, 1998 doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(97)00052-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newberry RC. Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44, 229–43, 1995 doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00616-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newberry RC, Swanson JC. Implications of breaking mother-young social bonds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 2–23, 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Numan M, Insel TR. The Neurobiology of Parental Behavior. Springer, New York, USA, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Panksepp J. Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Consciousness and Cognition 14, 30–80, 2005 doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2004.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panksepp J. Emotional endophenotypes in evolutionary psychiatry. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 30, 774–84, 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panksepp J. Affective neuroscience of the emotional Brainmind: Evolutionary perspectives and implications for understanding depression. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 112, 383–99, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Panksepp J, Zellner MR. Towards a neurologically based unified theory of aggression. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology 17, 37–61, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Peterson HV, Vestergaard K, Jensen P. Integration of piglets into social groups of free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23, 223–36, 1989 doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(89)90113-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pfaff DW. Drive: Neurobiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Sexual Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Provenza FD. Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2010–20, 1996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Rolls ET. Emotion Explained. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Salter RE, Hudson RJ. Feeding ecology of feral horses in western Alberta. Journal of Range Management 32, 221–5, 1979 doi: 10.2307/3897127
   Google Scholar
• Schino G. Reconciliation in domestic goats. Behaviour 135, 343–56, 1998 doi: 10.1163/156853998793066302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott CB, Banner RE, Provenza FD. Observations of sheep foraging in familiar and unfamiliar environments: Familiarity with environment influences diet selection. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49, 165–71, 1996 doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01040-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi J, Dunbar R. Feeding competition within a feral goat population on the Isle of Rum, NW Scotland. Journal of Ethology 24, 117–24, 2006 doi: 10.1007/s10164-005-0170-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrader AM, Kerley GIH, Kotler BP, Brown JS. Social information, social feeding, and competition in group-living goats (Capra hircus). Behavioral Ecology 18, 103–7, 2007 doi: 10.1093/beheco/arl057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Singer P. Animal Liberation. 2nd Edtn. Thorsons/Harper Collins Publishers: Hammersmith, London, UK, 1990
   Google Scholar
• *Smith KS. Characterization of Environmental and Stimulus-directed Exploration in Preweaning and Adult Rats. Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, Newark, USA, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Spinka M, Newberry RC, Bekoff M. Mammalian play: Training for the unexpected. Quarterly Review of Biology 76, 141–68, 2001 doi: 10.1086/393866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern S, Andersen N. Performance, site preferences, foraging and excretory behaviour in relation to feed allowance of growing pigs on pasture. Livestock Production Science 79, 257–65, 2003 doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00171-9
   Google Scholar
• *Stevenson M. The captive environment: Its effect on exploratory and related behavioural responses in wild animals. In: Archer J, Birke L (eds). Exploration in Animals and Humans. Pp 176–97. Nan Nostrand Reinhold, Wokingham, UK, 1983
   Google Scholar
• Stolba A, Wood-Gush DMG. The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment. Animal Production 48, 419–25, 1989 doi: 10.1017/S0003356100040411
   Google Scholar
• Thouless CR. Feeding competition between grazing red deer hinds. Animal Behaviour 40, 105–11, 1990 doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80669-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoek CS, ten Cate C. Abnormal behavior in caged birds kept as pets. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 1, 51–64, 1998 doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0101_5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanderschuren L, Niesnik R, Van Ree J. The neurobiology of social play behavior in rats. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 3, 309–26, 1997 doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(96)00020-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wathes C. Lives worth living? Veterinary Record 166, 468–9, 2010 doi: 10.1136/vr.c849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler B, Lea SEG. Adaptation by learning: Its significance for farm animal husbandry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108, 197–214, 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wemelsfelder F. The concept of animal boredom and its relationship to stereotyped behaviour. In: Lawrence AB, Rushen J (eds). Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. Pp 65–95. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Wemelsfelder F. The scientific validity of subjective concepts in models of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 53, 75–88, 1997 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01152-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wemelsfelder F. How animals communicate quality of life: The qualitative assessment of behaviour. Animal Welfare 16, 25–31, 2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wemelsfelder F, Birke L. Environmental challenge. In: Appleby MC, Hughes BO (eds). Animal Welfare. Pp 35–47. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Westerath HS, Laister S, Winckler C, Knierim U. Exploration as an indicator of good welfare in beef bulls: An attempt to develop a test for on-farm assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 126–33, 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirsing AJ, Cameron KE, Heithaus MR. Spatial responses of predators vary with prey escape mode. Animal Behaviour 79, 531–7, 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Gush DGM, Vestergaard K. Exploratory behavior and the welfare of intensively kept animals. Journal of Agricultural Ethics 2, 161–9, 1989 doi: 10.1007/BF01826929
   Google Scholar
• Wood-Gush DGM, Vestergaard K. The seeking of novelty and its relation to play. Animal Behaviour 42, 599–606, 1991 doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80243-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Gush DGM, Vestergaard K, Petersen HV. The significance of motivation and environment in the development of exploration in pigs. Biology and Behaviour 15, 39–52, 1990
   Google Scholar
• Yeates JW, Main DCJ. Assessment of positive welfare: A review. The Veterinary Journal 175, 293–300, 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Young RJ. Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK, 2003
   Google Scholar