References
- *Anonymous. Welfare Quality Assessment Protocol for Cattle. http://www.welfarequalitynetwork.net/media/1088/cattle_protocol_without_veal_calves.pdf (accessed 14 September 2018). Welfare Quality Network, Uppsala, Sweden, 2009
- *Anonymous. Animal Welfare Standards for Dairy Cattle. http://www.humaneheartland.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3&Itemid=106&jsmallfib=1&dir=JSROOT/Animal+Welfare+Full+Standards+%2B+Supplements&download_file=JSROOT/Animal+Welfare+Full+Standards+%2B+Supplements/Dairy+Cattle+Full+Standards.pdf (accessed 14 September 2018). American Humane, Washington, DC, USA, 2017
- *Anonymous. Broken Tail. https://www.ucdcowcalfassessment.com/broken-tail.html (accessed 14 September 2018). University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA, 2018a
- *Anonymous. Dairy Cows: Broken Tails. http://www.assurewel.org/dairycows/brokentails.html (accessed 9 October 2019). AssureWel, UK, 2018b
- *Anonymous. RSPCA Welfare Standards for Dairy Cattle. https://science.rspca.org.uk/sciencegroup/farmanimals/standards/dairycattle (accessed 14 September 2018). RSPCA, UK, 2018c
- *Anonymous. Code of Welfare: Dairy Cattle. https://www.agriculture.govt.nz/dmsdocument/1415-dairy-cattle-animal-welfare-code-of-welfare (accessed 9 October 2019). Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, NZ, 2018d
- *Bryan MA, Fruean SN, Moono P. Tail damage and tail scoring in NZ dairy cows – what is normal? Newsletter of the Society of Dairy Cattle Veterinarians of the New Zealand Veterinary Association 36 (4), 10–11, 2019
- de Oliveira D, Keeling LJ. Routine activities and emotion in the life of dairy cows: Integrating body language into an affective state framework. PLoS One 13, e0195674, 2018 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195674
- *de Wolf A. A welfare assessment system for dairy cows on pasture and the comparison to a welfare scoring system for cows in cubicles. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/44627 (accessed 9 October 2019). PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2010
- Grandin T. On-farm conditions that compromise animal welfare that can be monitored at the slaughter plant. Meat Science 132, 52–8, 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.05.004
- Haslegrave CM, Tracy MF, Corlett EN. Force exertion in awkward working postures-strength capability while twisting or working overhead. Ergonomics 40, 1335–56, 1997 doi: 10.1080/001401397187405
- Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Beveridge L, Matthews LR. The welfare of extensively managed dairy cattle: a review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42, 161–82, 1995 doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(94)00538-P
- Laven RA, Fabian J. Applying animal-based welfare assessments on New Zealand dairy farms: feasibility and a comparison with United Kingdom data. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 64, 212–7, 2016 doi: 10.1080/00480169.2016.1149523
- *Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E, Tiefe Hals-, Rumpf-, Schwanzfaszie. Lehrbuch der Anatomie der Haustiere, Band 1 Bewegungsapparat [ Textbook of the Anatomy of Domestic Animals, Volume I: Musculoskeletal System]. 6th Edtn. Pp 336–7. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany, 1992
- *Nielsen BH, Angelucci A, Scalvenzi A, Forkman B, Fusi F, Tuyttens FAM, Houe H, Blokhuis HJ, Sørensen JT, Rothmann J, et al. Use of Animal Based Measures for the Assessment of Dairy Cow Welfare (ANIBAM) External Scientific Report EN-659. https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2014.EN-659 (accessed 9 October 2019). EFSA, Parma, Italy, 2014
- *Winckler C. On-farm welfare assessment in cattle from basic concepts to feasible assessment systems. Proceedings of the 24th World Buiatrics Congress. Pp 493–501, 2006
- Zurbrigg K, Kelton D, Anderson N, Millman S. Stall dimensions and the prevalence of lameness, injury, and cleanliness on 317 tie-stall dairy farms in Ontario. The Canadian Veterinary Journal 46, 902–9, 2005
- *Non-peer-reviewed