Moral distress in rural veterinarians as an outcome of the Mycoplasma bovis incursion in southern New Zealand

References

• *Anderson I. Foot and Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons to be Learned Inquiry Report. The Stationery Office, London, UK, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Arbe Montoya A, Hazel S, Matthew S, McArthur M. Moral distress in veterinarians. Veterinary Record 185, 631, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartram DJ, Baldwin DS. Veterinary surgeons and suicide: a structured review of possible influences on increased risk. Veterinary Record 166, 388–97, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.b4794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartram DJ, Yadegarfar G, Baldwin DS. A cross-sectional study of mental health and well-being and their associations in the UK veterinary profession. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 44, 1075–85, 2009a. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0030-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartram DJ, Yadegarfar G, Baldwin DS. Psychosocial working conditions and work-related stressors among UK veterinary surgeons. Occupational Medicine 59, 334–41, 2009b. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqp072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor C, McKeegan D. Survey of the frequency and perceived stressfulness of ethical dilemmas encountered in UK veterinary practice. Veterinary Record 170, 19, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.100262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor C, Creed A, McKeegan D. A preliminary investigation into the moral reasoning abilities of UK veterinarians. Veterinary Record 177, 124, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett A, Chamberlin S. Resisting moral residue. Pastoral Psychology 62, 151–62, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-012-0458-8
   Google Scholar
• *Biesta G. Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research. 2^nd Edtn. Pp 95–117. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n4
   Google Scholar
• *Biosecurity New Zealand. Rapid Risk Assessment: Mycoplasma bovis in Bovine Semen. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/34179-mycoplasma-bovis-in-bovine-semen-rapid-risk-assessment (accessed 12 December 2022). Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, NZ, 2019
   Google Scholar
• *Biosecurity New Zealand. Timeline: Mycoplasma bovis in New Zealand. https://www.mbovis.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/RESOURCES-M-bovis-timeline-web.pdf (accessed 30 July 2022). Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, NZ, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Boyce C, Jaye C, Noller G, Bryan M, Doolan-Noble F. Mycoplasma bovis in New Zealand: a content analysis of media reporting. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 16, 335–55, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2021.1879180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, 328–52, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 13, 201–16, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Toward good practice in thematic analysis: avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Bryman A. Sampling in qualitative research. In: Bryman A (eds). Social Research Methods. 4th Edtn. Pp 415–29. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2012
   Google Scholar
• Byskov M. What makes epistemic injustice an “injustice”? Journal of Social Philosophy 52, 116–33, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caceres S. The roles of veterinarians in meeting the challenges of health and welfare of livestock and global food security. Veterinary Research Forum 3, 155–7, 2012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calcutt M, Lysnyansky I, Sachse K, Fox L, Nicholas A, Ayling R. Gap analysis of Mycoplasma bovis disease, diagnosis and control: an aid to identify future development requirements. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 65, 91–109, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardwell J, Lewis E. Stigma: coping, stress and distress in the veterinary profession – the importance of evidence-based discourse. Veterinary Record 184, 706–8, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.l3139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čartolovni A, Stolt M, Scott PA, Suhonen R. Moral injury in healthcare professionals: a scoping review and discussion. Nursing Ethics 28, 590–602, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020966776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Convery I, Mort M, Baxter J, Bailey C. Animal Disease and Human Trauma: Emotional Geographies of Disease. Palgrave MacMillan, London, UK, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227613
   Google Scholar
• Crane MF, Phillips JK, Karin E. Trait perfectionism strengthens the negative effects of moral stressors occurring in veterinary practice. Australian Veterinary Journal 93, 354–60, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean W, Talbot S, Dean A. Reframing clinician distress: moral injury not burnout. Federal Practitioner 36, 400–2, 2019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Doolan-Noble F, Bryan M, Noller G, Jaye C. A Summary of the Preliminary Findings of the Two Year Project: The Psychosocial Impact of Mycoplasma bovis on Rural Communities in Southern New Zealand. Ministerial Briefing: The Hon. Damien O’Connor, Minister of Agriculture. University of Otago, Dunedin, NZ, 2021
   Google Scholar
• Dow M, Chur-Hansen A, Hamood W, Edwards S. Impact of dealing with bereaved clients on the psychological wellbeing of veterinarians. Australian Veterinary Journal 97, 382–9, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek K, Nicholas RAJ, Szacawa E, Bednarek D. Mycoplasma bovis infections – occurrence, diagnosis and control. Pathogens 9, 640, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9080640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnberger C. Am I actually a veterinarian or an economist? Understanding the moral challenges for farm veterinarians in Germany on the basis of a qualitative online survey. Research in Veterinary Science 133, 246–50, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enticott G. Navigating the veterinary borderlands: ‘heiferlumps’, epidemiological boundaries and the control of animal disease in New Zealand. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42, 153–65, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enticott G, Donaldson A, Lowe P, Power M, Proctor A, Wilkinson K. The changing role of veterinary expertise in the food chain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366, 1955–65, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Environment and Natural Resources Committee. Enviroment and Natural Resources Committee Inquiry Into the Control of Ovine Johne’s Disease in Victoria. Parliament of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Epstein E, Delgado S. Understanding and addressing moral distress. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 15, 1, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol15No03Man01
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett A, Mullan S. Managing moral distress in practice. In Practice 40, 34–6, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.j5124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Fricker M. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• *Gibbs A. Focus groups. Social Research Update 19, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Goldkuhl G. Pragmatism v interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems 21, 135–46, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. 3rd Edtn. Pp 95–150. Sage, London, UK, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• *Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Pp 105–17. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Hansen B, Østerås O. Farmer welfare and animal welfare – exploring the relationship between farmer’s occupational well-being and stress: farm expansion and animal welfare. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 170, 9, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennink M, Kaiser B, Weber M. What influences saturation? Estimating sample sizes in focus group research. Quality Health Research 29, 1483–96, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318821692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jameton A. Nursing Practice: The Ethical Issues. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1984
   Google Scholar
• Jaye C, Noller G, Bryan M, Doolan-Noble F. “No better or worse off”: Mycoplasma bovis, farmers and bureaucracy. The Journal of Rural Studies 88, 40–9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaye C, McHugh J, Doolan-Noble F, Wood L. Wellbeing and health in a small New Zealand rural community: assets, capabilities and being rural-fit. Journal of Rural Studies 92, 284–93, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinkerson J. Defining and assessing moral injury: a syndrome perspective. Traumatology 22, 122–30, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1037/trm0000069
   Google Scholar
• Kwok C. Epistemic injustice in workplace hierarchies: power, knowledge and status. Philosopy and Social Criticism 47, 1104–31, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720961523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Long M, Springer S, Burgener I, Grimm H. Small animals, big decisions: potential of moral case deliberation for a small animal hospital on the basis of an observational study. In: Schübel H, Wallimann-Helmer I (eds). Justice and Food Security in a Changing Climate. Pp 261–6. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Netherlands, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-915-2_39
   Google Scholar
• Low J. A pragmatic definition of the concept of theoretical saturation. Sociological Focus 52, 131–9, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544514
   Google Scholar
• Moir F, Van den Brink A. Current insights in veterinarians’ psychological wellbeing. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 68, 3–12, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2019.1669504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley G, Bradbury-Jones C, Ives J. The moral distress model: an empirically informed guide for moral distress interventions. Journal of Clinical Nursing 31, 1309–26, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley G, Ives J, Bradbury-Jones C, Irvine F. What is ‘moral distress’? A narrative synthesis of the literature. Nursing Ethics 26, 646–62, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017724354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses L, Malowney M, Boyd J. Ethical conflict and moral distress in veterinary practice: a survey of North American veterinarians. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 32, 2115–22, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas R, Fox L, Lysnyansky I. Mycoplasma mastitis in cattle: to cull or not to cull. Veterinary Journal 216, 142–7, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noller G, Doolan-Noble F, Jaye C, Bryan M. The psychosocial impact of Mycoplasma bovis on southern New Zealand farmers: the human cost of managing an exotic animal disease incursion. Journal of Rural Studies 95, 458–66, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor E. Sources of work stress in veterinary practice in the UK. Veterinary Record 184, 588, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.104662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Office of the Chief Science Adviser. Report on Mycoplasma bovis Casing and Liaison Backlog. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/35538/direct (accessed 12 December 2022). Ministry of Primary Industries, Wellington, NZ, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 42, 533–44, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Paskin R. Mycoplasma bovis in New Zealand: A Review of Case and Data Management. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/35541/direct (accessed 12 December 2022). Dairy NZ, Wellington, NZ, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Pauly B, Varcoe C, Storch J. Framing the issues: moral distress in health care. HEC Forum 24, 1–11, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-012-9176-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Remnant J. Ensuring the Veterinary Profession Meets the Needs of Livestock Agriculture Now and in the Future. Nuffield Farming Scholarships Trust, Taunton, UK, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Riedel PL, Kreh A, Kulcar V, Lieber A, Juen B. A scoping review of moral stressors, moral distress and moral injury in healthcare workers during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, 1666, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson WD, Springer PR, Bischoff R, Geske J, Backer E, Olson M, Jarzynka K, Swinton J. Rural experiences with mental illness: through the eyes of patients and their families. Families, Systems, & Health 30, 308–21, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shadbolt N, Saunders C, Paskin R, Cleland T. The Mycoplasma bovis Programme: An Independent Review 2021. Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, NZ, 2021
   Google Scholar
• Sim J, Saunders B, Waterfield J, Kingstone T. Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21, 619–34, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1454643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonovich S, Webber-Ritchey K, Spurlark R, Florczak K, Mueller Wiesemann L, Ponder T, Reid M, Shino D, Stevens B, Aquino E. Moral distress experienced by US nurses on the frontlines during the COVID-19 pandemic: implications for nursing policy and practice. Sage Open Nursing 8, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221091059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Statistics New Zealand. Which Industries Contributed to New Zealand’s GDP? https://www.stats.govt.nz/tools/which-industries-contributed-to-new-zealands-gdp/ (accessed 27th July 2022). Statistics New Zealand, Wellington, NZ, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Stenfors T, Kajamaa A, Bennett D. How to assess the quality of qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher 17, 596–9, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroegindewey GV, Kertis K. Veterinary behavioural health issues associated with disaster response. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 36, 78–84, 2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting TL, Marion CR. Perpetration-induced traumatic stress – a risk for veterinarians involved in the destruction of healthy animals. Canadian Veterinary Journal 52, 794–6, 2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson V, Stevelink SAM, Greenberg N. Occupational moral injury and mental health: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry 212, 339–46, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2018.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Non-peer-reviewed
   Google Scholar