Advocacy in the study of religion\s

References

• Antweiler, Christoph. 1998. “Ethnologie als gesellschaftlich relevante Humanwissenschaft: Eine Systematisierung praxisorientierter Richtungen und eine Position.” Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 123 (2): 215–255. doi:10.2307/25842559.
   Google Scholar
• Baffelli, Erica, and Ian Reader. 2012. “Editors’ Introduction: Impact and Ramifications: The Aftermath of the Aum Affair in the Japanese Religious Context.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 39 (1): 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, Carol A. 2008. “Public Ethnography.” In Handbook of Emergent Methods, edited by Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber and Patricia Leavy, 265–281. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, Eileen. 1995. “The Scientific Study of Religion? You Must Be Joking!” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34 (3): 287–310. doi:10.2307/1386880. doi: 10.2307/1386880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaman, Lori. 2014. “Woven Together: Advocacy and Research as Complementary.” Religion 44 (2): 276–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, Douglas E. 2009. “Researching Scientology: Perceptions, Premises, Promises, and Problematics.” In Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis, 53–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cush, Denise. 2005. “Engaged Religious Studies: Some Suggestions for the Content, Methods and Aims of Learning and Teaching in the Future Study of Religions.” Discourse: Learning and Teaching in Philosophical and Religious Studies 4 (2): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, Lorne L. 1998. Comprehending Cults: The Sociology of New Religious Movements. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Droogers, André. 2010. “Towards the Concerned Study of Religion: Exploring the Double Power–Play Disparity.” Religion 40 (4): 227–238. doi:10.1016/j.religion.2010.07.001. doi: 10.1016/j.religion.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, Mark Q., and Steven Engler. 2012. “Semantic Holism and the Insider–outsider Problem.” Religious Studies 48 (02): 239–255. doi:10.1017/S0034412511000205. doi: 10.1017/S0034412511000205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastrup, Kirsten, and Peter Elsass [with comments by Ralph Grillo, Per Mathiesen and Robert Paine]. 1990. “Anthropological Advocacy: A Contradiction in Terms? [and Comments].” Current Anthropology 31 (3): 301–311. doi:10.2307/2743631. doi: 10.1086/203842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Introvigne, Massimo. 2014. “Advocacy, Brainwashing Theories, and New Religious Movements.” Religion 44 (2): 303–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 2011. “Revisiting the Insider-Outsider Debate: Dismantling a Pseudo-Problem in the Study of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 23 (1): 29–47. doi:10.1163/157006811X549689. doi: 10.1163/157006811X549689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Gregory B. 2014. “Off the Stage, On the Page: On the Relationship Between Advocacy and Scholarship.” Religion 44 (2): 289–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klöcker, Michael, and Udo Tworuschka, eds. 2008. Praktische Religionswissenschaft: ein Handbuch für Studium und Beruf. Köln: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Korom, Frank J. 2001. “Introduction: Fieldwork, Ethnography, and the History of Religions.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 13 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1163/157006801X00020. doi: 10.1163/157006801X00020
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, Marie Friedman, and Manuel A. Vásquez. 2014. “From the Body: An Exchange on Scholarship and Advocacy.” Religion 44 (2): 233–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melvær, Knut, and Michael Stausberg. 2013. “What is the Study of Religion\s? Self-Presentations of the Discipline on University Web Pages.” http://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/2013/12/06/what-is-the-study-of-religionsself-presentations-of-the-discipline-on-university-web-pages/
   Google Scholar
• Mullings, Leith, Monica Heller, Ed Liebow, and Aland Goodman. 2013. “Science, Advocacy and Anthropology.” Accessed January 15, 2013. http://blog.aaanet.org/2013/02/17/science-advocacy-and-anthropology/
   Google Scholar
• Neitz, Mary Jo. 2014. “Doing Advocacy from a Feminist Standpoint.” Religion 44 (2): 259–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuyama, Michiaki. 2011. “Religious Problems in Contemporary Japanese Society: Two Cases After the Aum Shinrikyo Affair.” In Religion and Social Problems, edited by Titus Hjelm, 173–185. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Susan J. 2011. The New Heretics of France: Minority Religions, la République, and the Government-sponsored “War on Sects”. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reader, Ian. 2000. “Scholarship. Aum Shinrikyô and Integrity.” Nova Religio 3 (2): 368–382. doi: 10.1525/nr.2000.3.2.368
   Google Scholar
• Reader, Ian. 2008. “Buddhism and the Perils of Advocacy.” Journal of Global Buddhism 9: 83–112.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, James T. 1998. “The Accidental Expert.” Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions 2 (1): 31–43. doi:10.1525/nr.1998.2.1.31. doi: 10.1525/nr.1998.2.1.31
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, Thomas. 1998. “Objectivity, Advocacy, and Animosity.” Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions 2 (1): 24–30. doi:10.1525/nr.1998.2.1.24. doi: 10.1525/nr.1998.2.1.24
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, Cristina, and Martin Baumann. 2008. “Buddhists and Scholars of Buddhism: Blurred Distinctions in Contemporary Buddhist Studies.” Journal of Global Buddhism 9: 81–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sponsel, Leslie E. 2001. “Advocacy in Anthropology.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by J. Smelser, 204–206. Oxford: Pergamon. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767007841
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, Steven P. 2013. “Religious Studies and the FBI: Adventures in Academic Interventionism.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 81 (4): 959–995. doi:10.1093/jaarel/lft033. doi: 10.1093/jaarel/lft033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Duncan Ryûken. 2008. “At Ease in Between: The Middle Position of a Scholar-Practicioner.” Journal of Global Buddhism 9: 155–163.
   Google Scholar