Bibliometrics and the study of religion\s¹

References

• Adams, Jonathan. 2009. “The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Quality in UK Higher Education Institutions.” Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis 57: 19–32. doi:10.1007/s00005-009-0003-3 doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0003-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, Nancy J., and Anne-Wil Harzing. 2009. “When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 8 (1): 72–95. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, E. S. 1929. “Periodicals for Mathematicians.” Science 70 (1825): 592–594. doi: 10.1126/science.70.1825.592
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amsterdamska, Olga, and L. Leydesdorff. 1989. “Citations: Indicators of Significance?.” Scientometrics 15 (5–6): 449–471. doi: 10.1007/BF02017065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault, Éric, and Étienne Vignola-Gagné. 2004. The Use of Bibliometrics in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Montreal: SSHRCC/Science-Metrix.
   Google Scholar
• Archambault, Éric, Étienne Vignola-Gagne, Grégoire Côté, Vincent Larivière, and Yves Gingras. 2006. “Benchmarking Scientific Output in the Social Sciences and Humanities: The Limits of Existing Databases.” Scientometrics 68 (3): 329–342. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0115-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald, G., and M. B. Line. 1991. “The Size and Growth of Serial Literature 1950–1987, in Terms of the Number of Articles per Serial.” Scientometrics 20 (1): 173–196. doi: 10.1007/BF02018154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunachalam, S., and K. Manorama. 1989. “Are Citation-Based Quantitative Techniques Adequate for Measuring Science on the Periphery?.” Scientometrics 15 (5–6): 393–408. doi: 10.1007/BF02017061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartol, Tomaz, Gordana Budimir, Doris Dekleva-Smrekar, Miro Pusnik, and Primoz Juznic. 2014. “Assessment of Research Fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the View of National Research Evaluation in Slovenia.” Scientometrics 98 (2): 1491–1504. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8 doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blizeka, William L., Michele Marie Desmaraisa, and Ronald R. Burkea. 2011. “Religion and Film Studies through the Journal of Religion and Film.” Religion 41 (3): 471–485. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2011.590698 doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2011.590698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Tibor, and András Schubert. 2007. “The Growth of Research on Inter- and Multidisciplinarity in Science and Social Science Papers, 1975–2006.” Scientometrics 73 (3): 345–351. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1933-3 doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1933-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgstock, M. 1991. “The Quality of Single and Multiple Authored Papers; An Unresolved Problem.” Scientometrics 21 (1): 37–48. doi: 10.1007/BF02019181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodman, Estelle. 1944. “Choosing Physiology Journals.” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 32 (4): 479–483.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cantú, Anselmo Garcia, and Marcel Ausloos. 2009. “Organizational and Dynamical Aspects of a Small Network with Two Distinct Communities: Neo-creationists vs. Evolution Defenders.” Scientometrics 80 (2): 457–472. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2065-0 doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2065-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, Francis Joseph, and Nellie B. Eales. 1917. “The History of Comparative Anatomy. Part I: A Statistical Analysis of the Literature.” Science Progress 11 (43): 578–596.
   Google Scholar
• Collazo-Reyes, Francisco. 2014. “Growth of the Number of Indexed Journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: The Effect on the Impact of Each Country.” Scientometrics 98 (1): 197–209. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1036-2 doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1036-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danell, Jenny-Ann Brodin, and Rickard Danell. 2009. “Publication Activity in Complementary and Alternative Medicine.” Scientometrics 80 (2): 539–551. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2078-8 doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2078-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bellis, Nicola. 2009. Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dou, H., L. Quoniam, and Parina Hassanaly. 1991. “The Scientific Dynamics of a City: A Study of Chemistry in Marseille from 1981 to the Present.” Scientometrics 22 (1): 83–93. doi: 10.1007/BF02019276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, Tim C. E., Truyken L. B. Ossenblok, and Eric H. J. Spruyt. 2012. “Changing Publication Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009.” Scientometrics 93 (2): 373–390. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2 doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Steven, and Michael Stausberg. 2010. “Acknowledging Peer Review.” Religion 40 (3): 147–151. doi:10.1016/j.religion.2010.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.religion.2010.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Steven, and Michael Stausberg. 2011. “Crisis and Creativity: Opportunities and Threats in the Global Study of Religion\s.” Religion 41 (2): 127–143. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2011.591209 doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2011.591209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errami, Mounir, and Harold Garner. 2008. “A Tale of Two Citations.” Nature 451 (7177): 397–399. doi: 10.1038/451397a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkenstaedt, T. 1990. “Measuring Research Performance in the Humanities.” Scientometrics 19 (5–6): 409–417. doi: 10.1007/BF02020703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, Eugene. 1955. “Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas.” Science 122 (3159): 108–111. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, Eugene. 1973. “Citation Impact Depends Upon the Paper, not the Journal! Don't Count on Citation by Association.” Current Contents 22: 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, Eugene. 1979. “Is Citation Analysis a Legitimate Evaluation Tool?.” Scientometrics 1 (4): 359–375. doi: 10.1007/BF02019306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, Eugene. 1980. “Is Information Retrieval in the Arts and Humanities Inherently Different from That in Science? The Effect That ISI®’s Citation Index for the Arts and Humanities Is Expected to Have on Future Scholarship.” The Library Quarterly 50 (1): 40–57. doi: 10.1086/629874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, Eugene. 2006. “The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor.” JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 295 (1): 90–93. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.1.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geilker, Charles D. 1968. “Matthew, Mark, or Luke Effect.” Science 159 (3820): 1185. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3820.1185-b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît. 2002. The Social Sciences in Canada: What Can We Learn From Bibliometrics? Working paper no. 1. Québec: Institut national de la recherche scientifique.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît. 2006. “On the Origins of Bibliometrics.” Scientometrics 68 (1): 109–133. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0086-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, Benoît. 2009. “The Value of Science: Changing Conceptions of Scientific Productivity, 1869 to circa 1970.” Social Science Information 48 (4): 547–586. doi:10.1177/0539018409344475 doi: 10.1177/0539018409344475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, P. L. K., and E. M. Gross. 1927. “College Libraries and Chemical Education.” Science (n.s.) 66 (1713): 385–389. doi: 10.1126/science.66.1713.385
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross, P. L. K., and A. O. Woodford. 1931. “Serial Literature Used by American Geologists.” Science 73 (1903): 660–664. doi: 10.1126/science.73.1903.660
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hackh, Ingo. 1936. “The Periodicals Useful in the Dental Library.” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 25 (1–2): 109–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinzkill, Richard. 1980. “Characteristics of References in Selected Scholarly English Literary Journals.” The Library Quarterly 50 (3): 352–365. doi: 10.1086/600992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemlin, S., and M. Gustafsson. 1996. “Research Production in the Arts and Humanities: A Questionnaire Study of Factors Influencing Research Performance.” Scientometrics 37 (3): 417–432. doi: 10.1007/BF02019256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Michael, Simon Shurville, and Ken Fernstrom. 2009. “The Quantitative Crunch: The Impact of Bibliometric Research Quality Assessment Exercises on Academic Development at Small Conferences.” Campus-Wide Information Systems 26 (3): 149–167. doi:10.1108/10650740910967348 doi: 10.1108/10650740910967348
   Google Scholar
• Henkle, H. H. 1938. “The Periodical Literature of Biochemistry.” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 27 (2): 139–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hicks, Diana M., and James E. F. Skea. 1989. “Is Big Really Better?.” Physics World 2 (12): 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, David R., and Jeffrey R. Lacasse. 2011. “Ranking Disciplinary Journals with the Google Scholar H-Index: A New Tool for Constructing Cases for Tenure, Promotion, and Other Professional Decisions.” Journal of Social Work Education 47 (3): 579–596. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2011.201000024 doi: 10.5175/JSWE.2011.201000024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, Vincent, and Yves Gingras. 2010. “The Impact Factor's Matthew Effect: A Natural Experiment in Bibliometrics.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (2): 424–427. doi:10.1002/asi.21232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudel, Grit. 2006. “The ‘Quality Myth’: Promoting and Hindering Conditions for Acquiring Research Funds.” Higher Education 52 (3): 375–403. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6414-5 doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6414-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, Steve. 2001. “Free Online Availability Substantially Increases a Paper's Impact.” Nature 411 (6837): 521. doi: 10.1038/35079151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, Peter A. 2008. “Lost in Publication: How Measurement Harms Science.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8: 9–11. doi:10.3354/esep00079 doi: 10.3354/esep00079
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, Thed. 2006. “The Application of Bibliometric Analyses in the Evaluation of Social Science Research. Who Benefits from It, and Why It Is Still Feasible.” Scientometrics 66 (1): 133–154. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewison, G., and R. Igic. 1999. “Yugoslav Politics, ‘Ethnic Cleansing’ and Co-Authorship in Science.” Scientometrics 44 (2): 183–192. doi: 10.1007/BF02457379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. 1998. “Theories of Citation?.” Scientometrics 43 (1): 5–25. doi: 10.1007/BF02458391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linmans, A. J. M. 2010. “Why with Bibliometrics the Humanities Does Not Need to Be the Weakest Link: Indicators for Research Evaluation Based on Citations, Library Holdings, and Productivity Measures.” Scientometrics 83 (2): 337–354. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0088-9 doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0088-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNinch, J. H. 1949. “The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference, London, June 21–July 2, 1948.” Bulleting of the Medical Library Association 37 (2): 136–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, Carolin, and Ulrich Schmoch. 2014. “Impact of Bibliometric Studies on the Publication Behaviour of Authors.” Scientometrics 98 (1): 369–385. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1015-7 doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1015-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhof, A. J. 2006. “Bibliometric Monitoring of Research Performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review.” Scientometrics 66 (1): 81–100. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nederhof, A. J., R. A. Zwaan, R. E. De Bruin, and P. J. Dekker. 1989. “Assessing the Usefulness of Bibliometric Indicators for the Humanities and the Social and Behavioural Sciences: A Comparative Study.” Scientometrics 15 (5–6): 423–435. doi: 10.1007/BF02017063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Michael, Charles Oppenheim, and Fytton Rowland. 2008. “The Citation Advantage of Open-access Articles.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (12): 1963–1972. doi: 10.1002/asi.20898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouris, Anastassios. 2007. “Is Fundamentalism a Threat to Science? Evidence from Scientometrics.” Scientometrics 71 (2): 329–338. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1673-4 doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1673-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, Alan. 1969. “Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?.” Journal of Documentation 25 (4): 348–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santa, Samaly, and Victor Herrero-Solana. 2010. “Cobertura de la ciencia de America Latina y el Caribe en Scopus vs Web of Science.” Investigacion Bibliotecologica 24 (52): 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, Robert D., Patricia Foland, and Roman Gorelskyy. 2009. “Do New SCI Journals Have a Different National Bias?.” Scientometrics 79 (2): 351–363. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0423-1 doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0423-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivertsen, Gunnar, and Birger Larsen. 2012. “Comprehensive Bibliographic Coverage of the Social Sciences and Humanities in a Citation Index: An Empirical Analysis of the Potential.” Scientometrics 91 (2): 567–575. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3 doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stausberg, Michael. 2010. “Prospects in Theories of Religion: Introductory Observations.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 22 (4): 223–238. doi:10.1163/157006810X531021 doi: 10.1163/157006810X531021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stausberg, Michael, and Steven Engler. 2013. “Acknowledging our Referees (with Selected Review Statistics).” Religion 43 (4): 457–462. doi:10.1080/0048721X.2013.837664 doi: 10.1080/0048721X.2013.837664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó, A. T. 1985. “Alphonse de Candolle's Early Scientometrics (1883, 1885) with References to Recent Trends in the Field (1978–1983).” Scientometrics 8 (1–2): 13–33. doi: 10.1007/BF02025219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter, Joost C. F., Amir A. Zadpoor, and Dimitra Dodou. 2014. “The Expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: A Longitudinal Study.” Scientometrics 98: 1547–1565. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1089-2 doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1089-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Siluo, Junping Qiu, and Zunyan Xiong. 2010. “An Empirical Study on the Utilization of Web Academic Resources in Humanities and Social Sciences Based on Web Citations.” Scientometrics 84 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0142-7 doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0142-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yitzhaki, M. 1997. “Variation in Informativity of Titles of Research Papers in Selected Humanities Journals: A Comparative Study.” Scientometrics 38 (2): 219–229. doi: 10.1007/BF02457410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar