Build It Better: Tinkering in Feminist Maker Pedagogy

Works cited

• Adam, Alison. Artificial Knowing: Gender and the Thinking Machine. Routledge, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. “A Feminist Approach to Teaching Quantum Physics.” Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering, edited by Sue Vilhauer Rosser, Teacher College, Columbia University, 1995, pp. 43–78.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke UP, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bilimoria, Diana, and Xiangfen Liang. “State of Knowledge about the Workforce Participation, Equity, and Inclusion of Women in Academic Science and Engineering.” Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies, edited by Mary Wyer, et al., Routledge, 2013, pp. 21–50.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bratich, Jack Z, and Heidi M Brush. “Fabricating Activism: Craft-Work, Popular Culture, Gender.” Utopian Studies, vol. 22, no. 2, 2011, pp. 233–60.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, Barbara. The Culture of Sewing: Gender, Consumption and Home Dressmaking. Bloomsbury Academic, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chidgey, Red. “Developing Communities of Resistance? Maker Pedagogies, Do-It-Yourself Feminism, and DIY Citizenship.” DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, edited by Matt Ratto and Megan Boler, The MIT Press, 2014, pp. 101–13.
   Google Scholar
• Cipolla, Cyd, et al. editors. Queer Feminist Science Studies: A Reader. U of Washington P, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• “Clare Jen | Faculty & Staff | Denison University.” 2 July 2018, https://denison.edu/people/clare-jen.
   Google Scholar
• Clover, Darlene. “Sewing Stories and Acting Activism: Women’s Leadership and Learning through Drama and Craft.” Ephemera, vol. 5, 2005, pp. 629–42.
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, Millie. “Spinning Silk, Weaving Selves: Nostalgia, Gender, and Identity in Japanese Craft Vacations.” Japanese Studies, vol. 21, no. 1, 2001, pp. 5–29. doi:10.1080/10371390120048722.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Sarah R. Hackerspaces: Making the Maker Movement. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Hester, Christina. “Geeks, Meta-Geeks, and Gender Trouble: Activism, Identity, and Low-Power Fm Radio.” Social Studies of Science, vol. 38, no. 2, 2008, pp. 201–32. doi:10.1177/0306312707082954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Hester, Christina. “Beyond “Dudecore”? Challenging Gendered and “Raced” Technologies through Media Activism.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 54, no. 1, 2010, pp. 121–35. doi:10.1080/08838150903550451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar-Hester, Christina. “Radical Inclusion? Locating Accountability in Technical DIY.” DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, edited by Matt Ratto and Megan Boler, The MIT Press, 2014, pp. 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, Stephen. Notes from Underground: Zines and the Politics of Alternative Culture. Verso, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, Ellen K. Making Cultures: Politics of Inclusion, Accessibility, and Empowerment at the Margins of the Maker Movement. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Ann Arbor, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, Elizabeth. “Craft as Activism.” The Journal of Social Theory in Art Education (Online), vol. 33, 2013, pp. 53.
   Google Scholar
• Gauntlett, David. Making Is Connecting. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• George, Linda A., and Johanna Brenner. “Increasing Scientific Literacy about Global Climate Change through a Laboratory-Based Feminist Science Course.” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 39, no. 4, 2010, pp. 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, Sara. “Building New Bioethical Practices through Feminist Pedagogies.” IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, pp. 81–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, Sara. “Theorizing Feminist Tinkering with Science Methodologies.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 3, 2018a, pp. 222–31. doi:10.1007/s42330-018-0027-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, Sara. “New Democratic Sciences, Ethics, and Proper Publics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 43, no. 3, 2018b, pp. 401–30. doi:10.1177/0162243917723078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, Jennifer. “Envisioning Cyborg Bodies: Notes from Current Research.” The Gendered Cyborg: A Reader, edited by Gill Kirkup, Routledge, 2000, pp. 74–88.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Sarah A. “‘Boundless Possibilities’: Home Sewing and the Meanings of Women’s Domestic Work in the United States, 1890-1930.” Journal of Women’s History, vol. 16, no. 2, 2004, pp. 68–91. doi:10.1353/jowh.2004.0045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, Betsy. Knitting for Good!: A Guide to Creating Personal, Social, and Political Change Stitch by Stitch. Shambhala Publications, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Greer, Betsy. Craftivism: The Art of Craft and Activism. Arsenal Pulp Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Groeneveld, Elizabeth. “‘Join the Knitting Revolution’: Third-Wave Feminist Magazines and the Politics of Domesticity.” Canadian Review of American Studies, vol. 40, no. 2, 2010, pp. 259–77. doi:10.3138/cras.40.2.259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, Sally. Pleasure, Power and Technology: Some Tales of Gender, Engineering, and the Cooperative Workplace. Taylor & Francis, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney, Fiona. “‘Use Your Hands for Happiness’: Home Craft and Make-Do-And-Mend in British Women’s Magazines in the 1920s and 1930s.” Journal of Design History, vol. 19, no. 1, 2006, pp. 23–38. doi:10.1093/jdh/epk003.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney, Fiona. “Quiet Activism and the New Amateur: The Power of Home and Hobby Crafts.” Design and Culture, vol. 5, no. 2, 2013, pp. 169–93. doi:10.2752/175470813X13638640370733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammonds, Evelyn. “The Matter of Women in Science.” Debates and Issues in Feminist Research and Pedagogy, edited by J. Holland and M. Blair, Open University, 1995, pp. 70–89.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, 1988, pp. 575–99. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra G. The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell UP, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, Flis. “Establishing Gender Perspectives on Information Technology.” Gendered by Design? Information Technology and Office Systems, edited by Eileen Green, et al., Taylor & Francis, 1993, pp. 31–52.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, Marc, et al., editors. “Disrupting and Displacing Methodologies in STEM Education: From Engineering to Tinkering with Theory for Eco-Social Justice.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 3, 2018, pp. 187–290. doi:10.1007/s42330-018-0020-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “The Interactive Fiction Archive.” 3 July 2018, https://www.ifarchive.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, Alan. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development. Routledge, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Steven J. “Rethinking Repair.” Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, et al., 2014, pp. 221–39.
   Google Scholar
• Jen, Clare. “Do-It-Yourself Biology, Garage Biology, and Kitchen Science.” Knowing New Biotechnologies: Social Aspects of Technological Convergence, edited by M. Wienroth and E. Rodrigues, Routledge, 2015, pp. 125–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Yasmin B., and Kylie A. Peppler. “Transparency Reconsidered: Creative, Critical and Connected Making with E-Textiles.” DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, edited by Matt Ratto and Megan Boler, MIT Press, 2014, pp. 179–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kempson, Michelle. “‘My Version of Feminism’: Subjectivity, DIY and the Feminist Zine.” Social Movement Studies, vol. 14, no. 4, 2015, pp. 459–72. doi:10.1080/14742837.2014.945157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleif, Tine, and Wendy Faulkner. “‘I’m No Athlete [But] I Can Make This Thing Dance!’—Men’s Pleasures in Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 28, no. 2, 2003, pp. 296–325. doi:10.1177/0162243902250908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langellier, K M. “Appreciating Phenomenology and Feminism: Researching Quiltmaking and Communication.” Human Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, 1994, pp. 65–80. doi:10.1007/BF01322767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, Faythe, and Cortney Heimerl. Handmade Nation: The Rise of DIY, Art, Craft, and Design. Princeton Architectural Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen E. “Can There Be a Feminist Science?” Hypatia, vol. 2, no. 3, 1987, pp. 51–64. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01341.x.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen E. “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues.” Synthese, vol. 104, no. 3, 1995, pp. 383–97. doi:10.1007/BF01064506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykke, Nina. “Between Monsters, Goddesses and Cyborgs: Feminist Confrontations with Science.” The Gendered Cyborg: A Reader, edited by Gill Kirkup, Routledge, 2000, pp. 58–73.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, Steve. “Learning by Being: Thirty Years of Cyborg Existemology.” The International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments, edited by Joel Weiss, et al., Springer, 2006, pp. 1571–92.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, Steve. “Maktivism: Authentic Making for Technology in the Service of Humanity.” DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, edited by Matt Ratto and Megan Boler, MIT Press, 2014, pp. 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, Carolyn. When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking about Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. Oxford UP, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberry, Maralee. “Reproductive and Resistant Pedagogies: The Comparative Role of Collaborative Learning and Feminist Pedagogy in Science Education.” Meeting the Challenge: Innovative Feminist Pedagogies in Action, edited by Maralee Mayberry and Ellen Cronan Rose, Routledge, 2013, pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• McCafferty, Sharisse D., and Geoffrey G McCafferty. “Spinning and Weaving as Female Gender Identity in Post-Classic Mexico.” Textile Traditions of Mesoamerica and the Andes: An Anthology, edited by Margot Blum Schevill, et al., U of Texas P, 1996, pp. 19–44.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, Peggy. Interactive Phases of Curricular Re-Vision: A Feminist Perspective. Wellesley College. Center for Research on Women, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Minahan, Stella, and Julie Wolfram Cox. “Stitch’nbitch: Cyberfeminism, a Third Place and the New Materiality.” Journal of Material Culture, vol. 12, no. 1, 2007, pp. 5–21. doi:10.1177/1359183507074559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, Josè Esteban. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York UP, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, Indira, and Sara Majetich. “Physics and Engineering in the Classroom.” Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering, edited by Sue Vilhauer Rosser, Teacher College, Columbia University, 1995, pp. 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, Ruth. “Boys and Their Toys: The Fisher Body Craftsman’s Guild, 1930-1968, and the Making of a Male Technical Domain.” Technology and Culture, vol. 38, no. 1, 1997, pp. 60–96. doi:10.2307/3106784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton-Johnson, Kate. “DIY Citizenship, Critical Making, and Community.” DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, edited by Matt Ratto and Megan Boler, MIT Press, 2014, pp. 141–55.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Rozsika. The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine. Women’s Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Peskowitz, Miriam. Spinning Fantasies: Rabbis, Gender, and History, Vol. 9. U of California P, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Piano, Doreen. “Resisting Subjects: DIY Feminism and the Politics of Style in Subcultural Production.” The Post-Subcultures, Reader, edited by David Muggleton and Rupert Weinzier, Berg Press, 2003, pp. 253–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, Anne, et al. “How Do Black Lives Matter in Teaching, Lab Practices, and Research?” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017. doi:10.28968/cftt.v3i1.28793.
   Google Scholar
• Ratto, Matt. “Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life.” The Information Society, vol. 27, no. 4, 2011, pp. 252–60. doi:10.1080/01972243.2011.583819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratto, Matt. “Textual Doppelgangers: Critical Issues in the Study of Technology.” DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, edited by Matt Ratto and Megan Boler, MIT Press, 2014, pp. 227–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ratto, Matt, and Megan Boler. DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media. MIT Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Ellen, and Maralee Mayberry editors. Meeting the Challenge: Innovative Feminist Pedagogies in Action. Taylor & Francis, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, Daniela K., and Miki Foster. “Woven Futures: Inscribed Material Ecologies of Critical Making.” DIY Citizenship: Critical Making and Social Media, edited by Matt Ratto and Megan Boler, MIT Press, 2014, pp. 189–99.
   Google Scholar
• Rosser, Sue Vilhauer editor. Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering. Teacher College, Columbia University, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, Deboleena. “Feminist Approaches to Inquiry in the Natural Sciences: Practices for the Lab.” Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis, edited by Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber, SAGE, 2011, pp. 313–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Jo. “Girls and Technology: Villain Wanted.” Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering, edited by Sue Vilhauer Rosser, Teacher College, Columbia University, 1995, pp. 147–59.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Joan Wallach, and Debra Keates. Going Public: Feminism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Private Sphere. U of Illinois P, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, Emma. “‘It’s Not a Hobby, It’s a Post-Apocalyptic Skill’: Space, Feminism, Queer, and Sticks and String.” Bad Subjects, vol. 83, 2012, p. 84.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, Banu. Ghost Stories for Darwin: The Science of Variation and the Politics of Diversity. U of Illinois P, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, Banu, and Angela Willey. “Introduction: Feminism’s Sciences.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy. “Located Accountabilities in Technology Production.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, 2002, p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, Sherry, and Seymour Papert. “Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 16, no. 1, 1990, pp. 128–57. doi:10.1086/494648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney, Joanne. The Culture of Knitting. English ed. Berg, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Varma, Roli. “Women in Computing: The Role of Geek Culture.” Science as Culture, vol. 16, no. 4, 2007, pp. 359–76. doi:10.1080/09505430701706707.
   Google Scholar
• Von Busch, Otto. “Exploring Net Political Craft: From Collective to Connective.” Craft Research, vol. 1, no. 1, 2010, pp. 113–24. doi:10.1386/crre.1.113_7.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, Angela. “Biopossibility: A Queer Feminist Materialist Science Studies Manifesto, with Special Reference to the Question of Monogamous Behavior.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 41, no. 3, 2016, pp. 553–77. doi:10.1086/684238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, Sara Ann, et al. “Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making Is Transforming Environmental Research.” The Information Society, vol. 30, no. 2, 2014, pp. 116–26. doi:10.1080/01972243.2014.875783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar