Works cited
- @sapinker (Steven Pinker). “Scientists’ March on Washington Plan Compromises Its Goals with Anti-Science PC/Identity Politics/Hard-Left Rhetoric.” https://goo.gl/AVB7mR. Twitter, 29 Jan. 2017a, 10:14 A.M., https://twitter.com/sapinker/status/825769152627482624?lang=en. Accessed 5 Feb. 19.
- @sapinker (Steven Pinker). “Glad to See that the March for Science Web Site Has Removed the Distractions. It‘s an Important Event.” https://www.marchforscience.com. Twitter, 30 Jan. 2017b, 9:02 A.M., https://twitter.com/sapinker/status/826113252585250816?lang=en. Accessed 5 Feb. 2019.
- Atkin, Emily. “Is the March for Science Bad for Scientists?” The New Republic, 1 Mar. 2017, https://newrepublic.com/article/140944/march-science-bad-scientists.
- Cippola, Cyd, et al. Queer Feminist Science Stuides: A Reader. U of Washington P, 2017.
- Fox, Rachel. “Too Fat to Be a Scientist?” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 17 June 2014, https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/conversation/2014/06/17/too-fat-to-be-a-scientist.
- Giordano, Sara. “Those Who Can‘t, Teach: Critical Science Literacy as a Queer Science of Failure.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–21. https://catalystjournal.org/index.php/catalyst/article/view/28790.
- Hamilton, Jennifer A., et al. “What Indians and Indians Can Teach Us about Colonization: Feminist Science and Technology Studies, Epistemological Imperialism, and the Politics of Difference.” Feminist Studies, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 612–23. doi:10.15767/feministstudies.43.3.0612.
- Haraway, Donna. Companion Species Manifesto: Dog‘s, People, and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm P, 2003.
- Harding, Sandra. “‘Strong Objectivity’: A Response to the New Objectivity Question.” Synthese, vol. 104, no. 3, 1995, pp. 331–49. doi:10.1007/BF01064504.
- Joseph, Miranda. Against the Romance of Community. U of Minnesota P, 2002.
- Longino, Helen E. “Can There Be a Feminist Science?” Hypatia, vol. 2, no. 3, 1987, pp. 51–64. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01341.x.
- March for Science. “Diversity.” The March for Science. 2 Feb. 2017a. Wayback Internet Archive, https://web.archive.org/web/20170202043304/https://www.marchforscience.com/. Accessed 5 Feb. 2019.
- March for Science. “March for Science Statement on the United States‘ Withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement.” Medium.com, 1 Jan. 2017b, https://medium.com/marchforscience-blog/march-for-science-statement-on-the-united-states-withdrawal-from-the-paris-climate-agreement-2444c0f1d197. Accessed 10 Feb. 2019.
- March for Science. “The Science behind the March for Science Crowd Estimates.” Medium.com, 17 May 2017c, https://medium.com/marchforscience-blog/the-science-behind-the-march-for-science-crowd-estimates-f337adf2d665. Accessed 10 Feb. 2019.
- March for Science. “Our Mission.” The March for Science, 10 Feb. 2019, https://www.marchforscience.com/our-mission. Accessed 5 Feb. 2019.
- Pitts-Tayor, Victoria. “Mattering: Feminism, Science, and Corporeal Politics.” Mattering: Feminism, Science, and Materialism, edited by Victoria Pitts-Taylor, New York UP, 2016, pp. 1–20.
- Rivers, Daniel Lanza. “Call for Papers: Women‘s Studies Special Issue.” Futures of Feminist Science Studies, 10 Sept. 2017.
- Snorton, C. Riley. Black on Both Sides: A Trans History of Black Identity, U of Minnesota P, 2017, pp. 17–53.
- Stern, Alexandra Minna. Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding. U of California P, 2005.
- Subramaniam, Banu. “Moored Metamorphoses: A Retrospective Essay on Feminist Science Studies.” Signs, vol. 32, no. 4, 2009, pp. 951–80. doi:10.1086/597147.
- Subramaniam, Banu. Ghost Stories for Darwin: The Science of Variation and the Politics of Diversity. U of Illinois P, 2014.
- Subramaniam, Banu, and Daniel Lanza Rivers. “Feminist Science Studies and the University: A Conversation with Banu Subramaniam and Daniel Lanza Rivers.” Women‘s Studies, vol. 48, no. 3, April/May 2019.
- Subramaniam, Banu, and Dobleena Roy. “Matter in Shadows: Feminist New Materialism and the Practices of Colonialism.” Mattering: Feminism, Science, and Materialism, edited by Victoria Pitts-Taylor. New York UP, 2016, pp. 23–42.
- Subramaniam, Banu, and Angela Willey. “Introduction: Science Out of Feminist Theory Part One: Feminism‘s Sciences.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–23. https://catalystjournal.org/index.php/catalyst/article/view/28784.
- Terry, Jennifer, and Jacqueline Urla editors. Deviant Bodies. Indiana UP, 1995.
- Willey, Angela. Undoing Monogamy: The Politics of Science and the Possibilities of Biology. Duke UP, 2016.
- Wyer, Wayne, et al. editors. Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies. Routledge, 2013.
- Young, Ed. “Six Months Later, Controversy Still Plagues the March for Science.” The Atlantic, 25 Oct. 2017, https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/10/six-months-later-controversy-still-plagues-the-march-for-science/543819/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2017.