Louise Bourgeois: An Early Modern Midwife’s Observations on Female Infertility

Works cited

• Bourgeois, Louise. Midwife to the Queen of France: Diverse Observations. Translated by Stephanie O’Hara. Edited by Alison Klairmont Lingo. Iter, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cody, Lisa Forman. Birthing the Nation: Sex, Science, and the Conception of Eighteenth-Century Britons. Oxford UP, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Gayle, and Tracey Loughran, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Infertility in History. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• de Serres, Louis. Discours de la nature, causes, signes, et curation des empeschemens de la conception, et de la sterilité des femmes. Lyons: Antoine Chard, 1625.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Jennifer. Aphrodisiacs, Fertility and Medicine in Early Modern England. The Boydell P, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Evenden, Doreen. The Midwives of Seventeenth-Century London. Cambridge UP, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fissell, Mary. Vernacular Bodies: The Politics of Reproduction in Early Modern England. Oxford UP, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, Rebecca. “The Invention of Infertility in the Classical Greek World: Medicine, Divinity, and Gender.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine, vol. 87, no. Winter, 2013, pp. 565–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2013.0064.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, Monica. Making Women’s Medicine Masculine: The Rise of Male Authority in Pre-Modern Gynaecology. Oxford UP, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, Laurent. Erreurs populaires. Bordeaux: Simon Millanges, 1578.
   Google Scholar
• Joubert, Laurent. Popular Errors. Translated by G. de Rocher. U of Alabama P, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Liebault, Jean. Trois livres appartenant aux infirmités et maladies des femmes. Paris: Jacques Dupuis, 1582.
   Google Scholar
• Lingo, Alison Klairmont. “Editor’s Introduction.” Midwife to the Queen of France: Diverse Observations, translated by Stephanie O’Hara and edited by Alison Klairmont Lingo, Iter P, 2017a, pp. 1–65.
   Google Scholar
• Morphis, Catherine. “Swaddling England: How Jane Sharp’s Midwives Book Shaped the Body of Early Modern Reproductive Tradition.” Early Modern Studies Journal, vol. 6, 2014, pp. 166–94.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hara, Stephanie. “Translator’s Introduction.” Midwife to the Queen of France: Diverse Observations Iter P, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Oren-Magidor, Daphna, and Catherine Rider. “Introduction: Infertility in Medieval and Early Modern Medicine.” Social History of Medicine, vol. 29, no. 2, 2016, pp. 211–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkv141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré, Amboise. Deux livres de chirurgie. 1. De la generation de l’homme […]. Paris: André Wechel, 1573.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Katherine. Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human Dissection. Zone Books, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, Wendy. “Midwives versus Doctors: The Case of Louise Bourgeois.” The Seventeenth Century, vol. 3, 1988, pp. 135–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.1988.10555279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps Walsh, Katharine. “Marketing Midwives in Seventeenth-Century London: A Re-examination of Jane Sharp’s the Midwives Book.” Gender & History, vol. 26, no. 2, 2–14, pp. 223–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12067.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Penny. “Sterility and Sovereignty: The Succession Crisis of the Late Valois Monarchy.” The Palgrave Handbook of Infertility in History, edited by Gayle Davis and Tracey Loughran, Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 151–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rouget, François. “De la sage-femme à la femme sage: Réflexion et réflexivité dans les Observations de Louise Bourgeois.” Papers on French Seventeenth-Century Literature, vol. 48, no. 9, 1998, pp. 483–96.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, Jane. The Midwives Book or the Whole Art of Midwifry, 1671. Edited by Elaine Hobby. Oxford UP, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Siegemund, Justine. The Court Midwife. Edited and translated by Lynne Tatlock. U of Chicago P, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Sarah. A Complete Practice of Midwifery. Consisting of Upwards of Forty Cases or Observations in that Valuable Art. London: Thomas Cooper, 1737.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Samuel S. “Early Modern Midwifery: Splitting the Profession, Connecting the History.” Journal of Social History, vol. 43, no. 1, Fall, 2009, pp. 115–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.0.0215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, Holly. Fictions: Childbirth and the Fairy Tale in Early-modern France. Wayne State UP, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Adrian. The Making of Man-Midwifery, Childbirth in England 1660–1770. Harvard UP, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Worth-Stylianou, Valerie. “The Definition of Obscene Material 1570–1615: Three Medical Treatises Held to Account.” Early Modern France, vol. 14, 2010, pp. 148–67.
   Google Scholar
• Worth-Stylianou, Valerie. Les Traités d’obstétrique en langue française au seuil de la modernité. Droz, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Worth-Stylianou, Valerie. Pregnancy and Birth in Early Modern France: Treatises by Caring Physicians and Surgeons (1581–1625). Edited and translated by Valerie Worth-Stylianou. Iter P, 2013.
   Google Scholar