Publication Cover
Xenobiotica
the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems
Volume 50, 2020 - Issue 1
721
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Twenty years of metabonomics: so what has metabonomics done for toxicology?

Pages 110-114 | Received 27 Oct 2019, Accepted 20 Nov 2019, Published online: 12 Dec 2019

References

  • Ament Z, Waterman CL, West JA, et al. (2013). A metabolomics investigation of non-genotoxic carcinogenicity in the rat. J Proteome Res. 12:5775–90.
  • Bando K, Kunimatsu T, Sakai J, et al. (2011). GC-MS-based metabolomics reveals mechanism of action for hydrazine induced hepatotoxicity in rats. J Appl Toxicol 31:524–35.
  • Barupal DK, Fiehn O. (2019). Generating the blood exposome database using a comprehensive text mining and database fusion approach. Environ Health Persp 127:097008.
  • Bollard ME, Stanley EG, Lindon JC, et al. (2005). NMR-based metabonomic approaches for evaluating physiological influences on biofluid composition. NMR Biomed 18:143–62.
  • Buesen R, Chorley BN, DA Silva Lima B, et al. (2017). Applying 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment: Report of an ECETOC workshop. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 91:S3–S13.
  • Chong J, Soufan O, Li C, et al. (2018). MetaboAnalyst 4.0: towards more transparent and integrative metabolomics analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W486–W494.
  • Clayton TA, Baker D, Lindon JC, et al. (2009). Pharmacometabonomic identification of a significant host-microbiome metabolic interaction affecting human drug metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:14728–33.
  • Coen M, Ruepp SU, Lindon JC, et al. (2004). Integrated application of transcriptomics and metabonomics yields new insight into the toxicity due to paracetamol in the mouse. J Pharm Biomed Anal 35:93–105.
  • Cottret L, Frainay C, Chazalviel M, et al. (2018). MetExplore: collaborative edition and exploration of metabolic networks. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W495–W502.
  • Ebbels TM, Keun HC, Beckonert OP, et al. (2007). Prediction and classification of drug toxicity using probabilistic modeling of temporal metabolic data: the consortium on metabonomic toxicology screening approach. J Proteome Res 6:4407–22.
  • Elbadawi-Sidhu M, Baillie RA, Zhu H, et al. (2017). Pharmacometabolomic signature links simvastatin therapy and insulin resistance. Metabolomics 13:pii:11.
  • Eliasson M, Rännar S, Trygg J. (2011). From data processing to multivariate validation–essential steps in extracting interpretable information from metabolomics data. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 12:996–1004.
  • Ellis JK, Athersuch TJ, Thomas LD, et al. (2012). Metabolic profiling detects early effects of environmental and lifestyle exposure to cadmium in a human population. BMC Med 10:61.
  • Everett JR. (2015). Pharmacometabonomics in humans: a new tool for personalized medicine. Pharmacogenomics 16:737–54.
  • Garrod S, Humpher E, Connor SC, et al. (2001). High-resolution (1)H NMR and magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopic investigation of the biochemical effects of 2-bromoethanamine in intact renal and hepatic tissue. Magn Reson Med 45:781–90.
  • Gavaghan CL, Holmes E, Lenz E, et al. (2000). An NMR-based metabonomic approach to investigate the biochemical consequences of genetic strain differences: application to the C57BL10J and Alpk:ApfCD mouse. FEBS Lett 484:169–74.
  • Heffernan AL, Gómez-Ramos MM, Gaus C, et al. (2017). Non-targeted, high resolution mass spectrometry strategy for simultaneous monitoring of xenobiotics and endogenous compounds in green sea turtles on the Great Barrier Reef. Sci Total Environ 599-600:1251–62.
  • Holmes E, Loo RL, Stamler J, et al. (2008). Human metabolic phenotype diversity and its association with diet and blood pressure. Nature 453:396–400.
  • Huang Q, Aa J, Jia H, et al. (2015). A pharmacometabonomic approach to predicting metabolic phenotypes and pharmacokinetic parameters of atorvastatin in healthy volunteers. J Proteome Res 14:3970–81.
  • Lee J, Yoon SH, Yi S, et al. (2019). Quantitative prediction of hepatic CYP3A activity using endogenous markers in healthy subjects after administration of CYP3A inhibitors or inducers. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 34:247–52.
  • Lewis GD, Wei R, Liu E, et al. (2008). Metabolite profiling of blood from individuals undergoing planned myocardial infarction reveals early markers of myocardial injury. J Clin Invest 118:(10):3503–12.
  • Li S, Cirillo P, Hu X, et al. (2019). Understanding mixed environmental exposures using metabolomics via a hierarchical community network model in a cohort of California women in 1960's. Reprod Toxicol pii:30603–8.
  • Lindon JC, Keun HC, Ebbels TM, et al. (2005). The Consortium for Metabonomic Toxicology (COMET): aims, activities and achievements. Pharmacogenomics 6:691–9.
  • Lindon JC, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, et al. (2003). Contemporary issues in toxicology the role of metabonomics in toxicology and its evaluation by the COMET project. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 187:137–46.
  • Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E. (1999). Metabonomics': understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica 29:1181–9.
  • Plumb RS, Stumpf CL, Gorenstein MV, et al. (2002). Metabonomics: the use of electrospray mass spectrometry coupled to reversed-phase liquid chromatography shows potential for the screening of rat urine in drug development. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 16:1991–6.
  • Rappaport SM. (2012). Biomarkers intersect with the exposome. Biomarkers 17:483–9.
  • Southam AD, Lange A, Al-Salhi R, et al. (2014). Distinguishing between the metabolome and xenobiotic exposome in environmental field samples analysed by direct-infusion mass spectrometry based metabolomics and lipidomics. Metabolomics 10:1050–8.
  • Warth B, Spangler S, Fang M, et al. (2017). Exposome-scale investigations guided by global metabolomics, pathway analysis, and cognitive computing. Anal Chem 89:11505–13.
  • Watanabe T, Suzuki T, Natsume M, et al. (2012). Discrimination of genotoxic and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens by statistical analysis based on gene expression profiling in the mouse liver as determined by quantitative real-time PCR. Mutat Res 747:164–75.
  • Waterman CL, Currie RA, Cottrell LA, et al. (2010). An integrated functional genomic study of acute phenobarbital exposure in the rat. BMC Genomics 11:9.
  • Waters NJ, Holmes E, Williams A, et al. (2001). NMR and pattern recognition studies on the time-related metabolic effects of alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate on liver, urine, and plasma in the rat: an integrative metabonomic approach. Chem Res Toxicol 14:1401–12.
  • Waters NJ, Waterfield CJ, Farrant RD, et al. (2005). Metabonomic deconvolution of embedded toxicity: application to thioacetamide hepato- and nephrotoxicity. Chem Res Toxicol 18:639–54.
  • Yip LY, Aw CC, Lee SH, et al. (2018). The liver-gut microbiota axis modulates hepatotoxicity of tacrine in the rat. Hepatology 67:282–95.
  • Zhang L, Nichols RG, Correll J, et al. (2015). Persistent organic pollutants modify gut microbiota-host metabolic homeostasis in mice through aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation. Environ Health Persp 123:679–88.
  • Zhou J, Tang L, Wang JS. (2019). Assessment of the adverse impacts of aflatoxin B1 on gut-microbiota dependent metabolism in F344 rats. Chemosphere 217:618–28.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.