9
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Symposium: Preschool/School Vision and Eye Screening: Current Techniques and Future Trends

Practical Aspects of Pediatric Vision Screening

, M.D., F.A.C.S. & , C.O., C.O.T.
Pages 62-72 | Published online: 05 Apr 2018

References

  • American Academy of Ophthalmology: Infant and children's eye care—A position statement for the select panel on child health. Washington, DC, American Academy of Ophthalmology, Governmental Relations Office, 1980.
  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine: Vision screening and eye examination in children. Pediatrics 1986; 77:918–919.
  • Bettman JW Jr, Stern EL, Whitsell LJ, Gofman HF: Cerebral dominance in developmental dyslexia: Role of ophthalmology. Arch Ophthalmol 1967; 78:722–730.
  • Flax N: Visual function in learning disabilities. J Learning Disabilities 1968; 1:551.
  • Norn MS, Rindziunsky, Skydsgaard: Ophthalmologic and orthoptic examinations of dyslectics. Acta Ophthalmologica 1969; 47:147.
  • Ingram RM, Holland WW, Walker C, et al: Screening for visual defects in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol 1986; 70:16–21.
  • Ingram RM: Refraction as a basis for screening children for squint and amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1977; 61:8–15.
  • Ingram RM, Barr A: Changes in refraction between the ages of 1 and 3½ years. Br J Ophthalmol 1979; 63:339–342.
  • Ingram R, Traynar M, Walker C, Wilson J: Screening for refractive errors at age 1 year: A pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol 1979; 63:243–250.
  • Cross AW: Health screening in schools. Part I. J Pediatr 1985; 107(4):487–94.
  • American Optometric Association: The American Optometric Association guidelines on vision screening. Washington, DC, American Optometric Association Publication No ODE-11-879, 1979.
  • National Society to Prevent Blindness: A guide for eye inspection and testing visual acuity of preschool children—A screening process. New York, NY, 1976.
  • National Society to Prevent Blindness: 1977–78 Preschool vision screening program summary. New York, NY, 1979.
  • National Society to Prevent Blindness: 1980–81 Preschool vision screening program summary. New York, NY, 1981.
  • Kohler L, Stigmar G: Vision screening of 4-year-old children. Acta Paediatr Scand 1973; 62:17.
  • Ehrlich MI, Reinecke RD, Simons K: Preschool vision screening for amblyopia and strabismus: Programs, methods, guidelines. Survey Ophthalmol 1983; 28:145–163.
  • Simons K: A comparison of the Frisby, Random Dot E, TNO, and Randot Circles stereotests in screening and office use. Arch Ophthalmol 1981; 99:446–452.
  • Simons K: Visual acuity norms in young children. Survey Ophthalmol 1983; 28:84–92.
  • Rosner J: The effectiveness of the Random Dot E Stereotest as a preschool vision screening instrument. J Am Optom Assoc 1977; 49: 1121–1124.
  • Shea SL, Fox R, Aslin RN, Dumais ST: Assessment of stereopsis in human infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980; 19:1400–1404.
  • Reinecke RD: Screening 3-year-olds for visual problems. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104:33.
  • Hammond RS, Schmidt PP: A Random Dot E stereogram for the vision screening of children. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104:54–60.
  • Cooper J, Feldman J: Random-dot-stereograms performance by strabismic, amblyopic, and ocular-pathology patients in an operant discrimination task. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1979; 55:599–609.
  • Avilla CW, von Noorden GK: Limitation of the TNO random dot stereo test for visual screening. Am Orthopt J 1981; 31:87–90.
  • Von Noorden GK: Stereoacuity testing does not replace visual acuity testing. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104(8):1112–3.
  • Campos EC, Enoch JM: Amount of aniseikonia compatible with fine binocular vision: Some old and new concepts. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1980; 17:44–47.
  • Molteno E: Trans Ophthalmic Soc New Zealand 1983; 35:43–49.
  • Day SH, Norcia AM, and Allen D: Factors affecting the sensitivity and specificity of photorefraction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27:1.
  • Day S: Screening infant amblyopia. JAMA 1987; 257(8):1026.
  • Day SH, Norcia AM: Photographic detection of amblyopic factors. Ophthalmol 1986; 93(1): 25–28.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.