Reconsidering Hierarchy and Egalitarianism in Austronesian Taiwan

References

• Bloch, Maurice. 1995. “People Into Places: Zafimaniry Concept of Clarity.” In The Anthropology of Landscape, edited by E. Hirsch, and M. O’Hanlon, 63–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blust, R. 1980. “Early Austronesian Social Organization: The Evidence of Language.” Curent Anthropology 21 (2): 205–226. doi: 10.1086/202430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blust, R. 1999. “Subgrouping, Circularity and Extinction: Some Issues in Austronesian Comparative Linguistics.” In Selected Papers From the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, edited by E. Zeitoun, and P. J. K. Li, 31–94. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
   Google Scholar
• Bouquet, Mary. 1993. Reclaiming English Kinship: Portuguese Refractions of British Kinship Theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannan, Laura. 1952. A Genealogical Charter. Africa 23: 301–315. doi: 10.2307/1156915
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, Bien. 1993. House and social hierarchy of the Paiwan. Unpublished PhD dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, Bien. [2000] 2009. “Customary Laws, Kinship and Beyond: A Critical Review of the Cultural Anthropological Studies of the Austronesian People in Taiwan.” In Austronesian Taiwan: Linguistics, History, Ethnology, Prehistory, edited by David Blundell, 201–245. Shung Ye Museum of Formosan Aborigines and Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Bronwen. 1979. “Rank, Power, Authority: A Reassessment of Traditional Leadership in South Pacific Societies.” The Journal of Pacific History 14 (1): 2–27. doi: 10.1080/00223347908572362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard, Edward Evan. 1940. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, James J. 1971. “Sister’s Child as Plant: Metaphors in an Indiom of Consanguinity.” In Rethinking Kinship and Marriage, edited by Rodney Needham, 219–252. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, James J. 1996. “The Transformation of Progenitor Lines of Origin: Patterns of Precedence in Eastern Indonesia.” In Origins, Ancestry and Alliance: Explorations in Austronesian Ethnography, edited by James J. Fox, and Clifford Sather, 130–153. Canberra: Department of Anthropology, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University. Comparative Austronesian Series, ANU E Press. http://epress.anu.edu.au/.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, James J. 2008. “Installing the ‘Outsider’ Inside: the Exploration of an Epistemic Austronesian Cultural Theme and its Social Significance.” Indonesia and the Malay World 36 (105): 201–218. doi: 10.1080/13639810802267942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, James J. 2009a. “Introduction: Precedence in Perspective.” In Precedence: Social Differentiation in the Austronesian World, edited by Michael P Vischer, 1–11. Canberra, Australia: ANU ePress.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Person, Time and Conduct in Bali.” In The Interpretation of Cultures, 360–411. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, Thomas, and Donald Tuzin. 2001. Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia: An Exploration of the Comparative Method. CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Ying-kuei. 1986. “Two Types of Social Systems among Taiwan Aborigines and Its Implications.” In Essays of Taiwanese Aboriginal Social and Cultural Studies, edited by Y. Huang, 1–43. Taipei: Linking Publishing. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Ying-kuei. 1996. “The “Great Men” Model among the Bunun of Taiwan.” In Astronesian Studies Relating to Taiwan, edited by P. J. Li, 59–107. Taipei: IHP.
   Google Scholar
• Hugh-Jones, Stephen. 1988. The Palm and the Pleides: Initiation and Cosmology in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, Margaret, and Mark Mosko. 1994. “Transformations of Hierarchy: Structure, History and Horizon in the Austronesian World.” History and Anthropology 7 (1-4): 1–409. doi: 10.1080/02757206.1994.9960839
   Google Scholar
• Ku, Kun-hui. 2002. “Religious Processes: Conversion vs. Indigenization—A Case Study of the Paiwan.” Cultural Studies Monthly 18), (e-journal in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Ku, Kun-hui. 2008. “Ethnographic Studies of Voting among the Austronesian Paiwan: The Role of Paiwan Chiefs in Contemporary State System of Taiwan.” Pacific Affairs 81 (3): 383–406. doi: 10.5509/2008813383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, Kun-hui. 2010. ““‘Who is Your Name?’” Naming Paiwan Identities in Contemporary Taiwan.” In Personal Names in Asia: History, Culture and Identity, edited by Zheng Yangwen, and Charles MacDonald, 199–223. Prefaced by James Scott, Singapore: Singapore University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, Kun-hui. 2016. “Naming Relationship and Constructing Hierarchy: Names, Value, and Hierarchy among the Austronesian Paiwan, Taiwan.” Pacific Studies 39 (1-2): 74–100.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, Edmund. 1977 (1954). Political Systems of Highland Burma: A Study of Kachin Social Structure. London: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1982. The Way of the Masks. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Yi-yuan. 1982. “Two Kinds of Socio-Religious Structural System among Indigenous Taiwan.” In Society and Culture of Indigenous Taiwan, edited by Yi-yuan Li, 381–394. Taipei: Linking Publishing. (In Chinese.).
   Google Scholar
• Mabuchi, Toichi. 1960a. “The Aboriginal Peoples of Formosa.” In Social Structure in Southeast Asia, edited by George Peter Murdock, 127–140. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology. Chicago: Quadrangle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mabuchi, Toichi. 1960b. The two types of kinship ritual among Malayo-Polynesian Peoples. in Proceedings of the 9th International Congress for the History of Religions. Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Mosko, Mark. 1994. “Transformations of Dumont: The Hierarchical, the Sacred, and the Profane in India and Ancient Hawaii.” History and Anthropology 7 (1-4): 19–86. doi: 10.1080/02757206.1994.9960840
   Google Scholar
• Paiwan Presbytery, PCT. 1993. Senai tua Cemas. Pingtung: Paiwan Presbytery Hymnbook Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, Marshall. 1963. “Poor man, Rich man, Big-man, Chief: Political Types in Melanesia and Polynesia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 5: 285–303. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500001729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Haoli, and R. Scagalion. 2019. “Austronesian Speakers and Hereditary Leadership in the Pacific.” Anthropological Forum 29 (3): 1–17. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/00664677.2019.1624502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Joyce. 1995. “Incorporating Heterarchy Into Theory on Socio-Political Development: The Case for Southeast Asia.” In Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies, edited by Robert M. Ehrenreich, Carole L. Crumley, and Janet E. Levy, 101–124. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No 6. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Shu-Yuan. 2005. “Political Systems of Highland Taiwan: Preliminary Analysis of the Bunun Case.” Taiwan Journal of Anthropology 3 (1): 185–219. (In Chinese).
   Google Scholar