Different perspectives in measuring processes in psychodynamic child psychotherapy

References

• Ablon, S. J., Levy, R. A., & Smith-Hansen, L. (2011). The contributions of the Psychotherapy Process Q-Set to psychotherapy research. Research in Psychotherapy, 14(1), 14–48.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-IV. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bychkova, T., Hillman, S., Midgley, N., & Schneider, S. (2011). The psychotherapy process with adolescents: A first pilot study and preliminary comparisons between different therapeutic modalities using the Adolescent Psychotherapy Q. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 37(3), 327–348.
   Google Scholar
• Carlberg, G. (2010). Focused systematic case studies: An approach linking clinical work and research. In J. Tsiantis & J. Trowell (Eds.), Assessing change in psychoanalytic psychotherapy of children and adolescents: Today’s challenge (pp. 93–113). London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, H.-S. J., Røssberg, J. I., Bøgwald, K. P., Gabbard, G. O., & Høglend, P. A. (2012). Countertransference feelings in one year of individual therapy: An evaluation of the factor structure in the Feeling Word Checklist-58. Psychotherapy Research, 22(1), 12–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, H.-S. J., Røssberg, J. I., Crits-Christoph, P., Gabbard, G. O., Hersoug, A. G., Perry, J. C., … Høglend, P. A. (2014). Long-term effects of analysis of the patient–Therapist relationship in the context of patients’ personality pathology and therapists’ parental feelings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(3), 460–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lorenzo, M., Maggiolini, A., & Suigo, V. A. (2015). A developmental perspective on adolescent psychoanalytic psychotherapy. An Italian study with the adolescent Psychotherapy Q-Set. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 18(2), 102–113.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Moran, G. S., Steel, H., & Higgit, A. C. (1991). The capacity for understanding mental states: The reflective state in parent and child and its significance for security of attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 12(3), 201–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastaud, M. B., Carvalho, C., Goodman, G., & Ramires, V. R. R. (2015). Assessing levels of similarity to a “psychodynamic prototype” in psychodynamic psychotherapy with children: A case study approach (preliminary findings). Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 37(3), 161–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodman, G., & Athey-Lloyd, L. (2011). Interaction structures between a child and two therapists in the psychodynamic treatment of a child with Asperger’s disorder. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 37(3), 311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, G., Midgley, N., & Schneider, C. (2016). Expert clinicians’ prototypes of an ideal child treatment in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapy: Is mentalization seen as a common process factor? Psychotherapy Research, 26(5), 590–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. (1997). The strength and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedure and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, R. (2001). Patterns of consistency and deviation in therapists’ countertransference feelings. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 10(2), 104–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmqvist, R., & Armelius, B. Å. (1996). Sources of therapists’ countertransference feelings. Psychotherapy Research, 6(1), 70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E. (2000). Therapeutic action: A guide to psychoanalytic therapy. North Bergen: Book-mart Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2009). Understanding why psychotherapy leads to change. Psychotherapy Research., 19(4–5), 418–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundh, A., Kowalski, J., Sundberg, C. J., Gumpert, C., & Landén, M. (2010). Children’s global assessment scale (CGAS) in a naturalistic clinical setting: Inter-rater reliability and comparison with expert ratings. Psychiatry Research, 177, 206–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley, N. (2007). Researching the process of psychoanalytic child psychotherapy. In E. Kennedy & E. Midgley (Eds.), Process and outcome research in child, adolescent and parent-infant psychotherapy: A thematic review (pp. 8–53). North Central London Strategic Health Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, N., & Kennedy, E. (2011). Psychodynamic psychotherapy for children and adolescents: A critical review of the evidence base. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 37(3), 232–260.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A., Aron, L., Harris, A., & Suchet, M. (Eds.). (1999). Relational psychoanalysis. New York: Analytic.
   Google Scholar
• Odhammar, F., & Carlberg, G. (2015). Parents’ and psychotherapists’ goals prior to psychodynamic child psychotherapy. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 17(3), 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odhammar, F., Sundin, E., Jonson, M., & Carlberg, G. (2011). Children in psychodynamic psychotherapy. Changes in global functioning. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 37(3), 261–279.
   Google Scholar
• Pruetzel-Thomas, A. (2006). Exploring child Psychotherapy Process and Q-Sort methodology. London: Anna Freud Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Ramires, V. R. R., Carvalho, C., Schmidt, F. M. D., Fiorini, G. P., & Goodman, G. (2015). Interaction structures in the psychodynamic therapy of a boy diagnosed with Asperger’s disorder: A single-case study. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 18(2), 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., & Jones, E. E. (2004). The Child Psychotherapy Q-set coding manual. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., Midgley, N., & Duncan, A. (2010). A “motion portrait” of a psychodynamic treatment of an 11-year-old girl: Exploring interrelations of psychotherapy process and outcome using the Child Psychotherapy Q-Set. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 9(2–3), 94–107.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., Pruetzel-Thomas, A., & Midgley, N. (2009). Discovering new ways of seeing and speaking about psychotherapy process: The Child Psychotherapy Q-set. In N. Midgley, J. Anderson, E. Grainger, T. Nesic-Vuckovic, & C. Urwin (Eds.), Child psychotherapy and research: New approaches, emerging findings (pp. 72–84). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, T., Orlinsky, D., Rønnestad, M. H., & Willutzki, U. (2015). Psychotherapeutic process from the psychotherapist’s perspective. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome; psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 351–365). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D., Gould., M. S., Brasic, J., Ambrosini, P. A., Bird, H., & Aluwahlia, S. (1983). A children’s global assessment scale (CGAS). Archives of General Psychiatry, 11(40), 1228–1231.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, B., & Hansen, B. R. (2008). The emergent helper – Steps in the early phase of alliance formation with children. Matrix, 25(4), 297–322.
   Google Scholar