Imported Grave Goods and the Early Anglo-Saxon Economy

NOTES

• C. Renfrew, ‘Trade as Action at a Distance: Questions of Integration and Communication’, 3–59 in J. A. Sabloff and C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky (eds), Ancient Civilisation and Trade (Albuquerque, 1975), for example.
   Google Scholar
• A. L. Meaney, Anglo-Saxon Amulets and Curing Stones (Oxford, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Brit. Ser. 96, 1981): cowrie shells, crystal beads, crystal balls, amethyst beads; J. N. L. Myres and B. Green, The Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries of Caistor-by-Norwich and Markshall, Norfolk (Soc. Antiq. Res. Rep. 30, 1973): ivory rings; V. I. Evison, ‘Glass Cone Beakers of the Kempston Type’, J. Glass Studies, 14 (1972), 48–66: glass vessels; V. I. Evison, ‘Germanic Glass Drinking Horns’, J. Glass Studies, 17 (1975), 74–87: glass vessels; V. I. Evison, Wheel-Thrown Pottery in Anglo-Saxon Graves (Roy. Archaeol. Inst., 1979): wheel-thrown pottery; V. I. Evison, ‘Anglo-Saxon Glass Claw Beakers’, Archaeologia, 107 (1982), 43–76: glass vessels; V. I. Evison, Dover: The Buckland Anglo-Saxon Cemetery (London, Hist. Build. Monum. Comm. Engl. Archaeol. Rep. 3, 1987): ivory rings, cowrie shells; D. B. Harden, ‘Glass Vessels in Britain and Ireland, A.D. 400–1000’, 132–67 in D. B. Harden (ed.), Dark-Age Britain: Studies Presented to E. T. Leeds (London, 1956): glass vessels; D. B. Harden, ‘Anglo-Saxon and Later Medieval Glass in Britain: Some Recent Developments’, Medieval Archaeol., 22 (1976), 1–24: glass vessels; J. W. Huggett, ‘“Prestige” Grave Goods and the Pagan Anglo-Saxon Economy’ (Unpub. B.A. diss., Univ. Leeds, 1982): amber beads, crystal beads, cowrie shells, wheel-thrown pottery, crystal balls, amethyst beads, glass vessels, ivory rings.
   Google Scholar
• C. W. Beck, ‘Amber in Archaeology’, Archaeology, 27 (1970), 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 9.
   Google Scholar
• Meaney, op. cit. in note 2, 67.
   Google Scholar
• T. C. Lethbridge, ‘Recent Excavations in Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries in Cambridgeshire and Suffolk’, Cambridge Antiq. Soc. Quarto Pub., new ser. III (1931), 437.
   Google Scholar
• R. F. Jessup, Anglo-Saxon Jewellery (London, 1950), 52.
   Google Scholar
• T. D. Kendrick, ‘Polychrome Jewellery in Kent’, Antiquity, 7 (1933), 440; S. C. Hawkes, ‘The Dating and Social Significance of the Burials in the Polhill Cemetery’, 186–201 in B. J. Philp (ed.), Excavations in West Kent 1960–1970 (Kent Rescue Unit, 1973); Meaney, op. cit. in note 2, 76.
   Google Scholar
• Meaney, op. cit. in note 2, 76.
   Google Scholar
• E. T. Leeds, The Archaeology of the Anglo-Saxon Settlements (Oxford, 1913), 131–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, op. cit. in note 8, 192.
   Google Scholar
• Meaney, op. cit. in note 2, 76.
   Google Scholar
• J. Beckwith, Ivory Carvings in Early Medieval England (London, 1972), 116.
   Google Scholar
• A. MacGregor, Bone, Antler, Ivory and Horn: The Technology of Skeletal Materials since the Roman Period (London, 1985), 112.
   Google Scholar
• Myres and Green, op. cit. in note 2, 101; MacGregor, op. cit. in note 14, 110.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, op. cit. in note 14, 40.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 14.
   Google Scholar
• Myres and Green, op. cit. in note 2, 101.
   Google Scholar
• Meaney, op. cit. in note 2, 78.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 80.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 77.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 84.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 85.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 123.
   Google Scholar
• D. B. Harden, ‘Glass Vessels in Britain and Ireland, A.D. 400–1000’, 132–67 in D. B. Harden, Dark-Age Britain: Studies Presented to E.T. Leeds (London, 1956), 147.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 148.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 146–47; V. I. Evison, ‘Anglo-Saxon Glass Claw Beakers’, Archaeologia, 107 (1982), 58.
   Google Scholar
• Harden, op. cit. in note 25, 146–47.
   Google Scholar
• Evison, op. cit. in note 27, 58.
   Google Scholar
• V. I. Evison, Wheel-Thrown Pottery in Anglo-Saxon Graves (Royal Archaeol. Inst., 1979), 43, 45.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 45.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 48, 57; maps 4 and 5.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 48, 57.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 49.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 49.
   Google Scholar
• See fig. 33 in S. C. Hawkes, ‘Anglo-Saxon Kent c. 425–725’, 64–78 in P. E. Leach (ed.), Archaeology in Kent to A.D. 1500 (Counc. Brit. Archaeol. Res. Rep. 48, 1982).
   Google Scholar
• S. E. Rigold, ‘The Sutton Hoo Coins in the Light of the Contemporary Background of Coinage in England’, 653–77 in R. L. S. Bruce-Mitford, The Sutton Hoo Ship Burial I (London, 1975).
   Google Scholar
• For example, D. H. Thomas, Figuring Anthropology: First Principles of Probability and Statistics (New York, 1976), 336–37.
   Google Scholar
• The simulation routine was developed by M. R. Attwell and M. Fletcher—see M. R. Attwell and M. Fletcher, ‘An Analytical Technique for Investigating Spatial Relationships’, J. Archaeol. Science, 14 (1987), 1–11. 40 See M. S. Lewis-Beck, Applied Regression: An Introduction (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 1980), for example.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The equation of the curve is given by: Y = aXb, where a = intercept of the curve on the Y-axis, b = slope of the curve, Y = quantity, and X = distance. The linear relationship is given by: log(Y) = log(a) + b * log(X).
   Google Scholar
• The linear equation is given by: Y = a + bX.
   Google Scholar
• See, for example, J. R. Clark, ‘Measuring the Flow of Goods with Archaeological Data’, Econ. Geog., 55(1)(1979), 1–17; R. E. Fry (ed.), Models and Methods in Regional Exchanges (Soc. Amer. Archaeol. Papers 1, 1980); I. Hodder, ‘Regression Analysis of Some Trade and Marketing Patterns’, World Archaeol., 6(2) (1974), 172–89; I. Hodder, ‘Some Effects of Distance on Human Interaction’, 156–78 in I. Hodder (ed.), The Spatial Organisation of Culture (London, 1978); I. Hodder and C. Orton, Spatial Analysis in Archaeology (Cambridge, 1976); Renfrew, op. cit. in note 1; C. Renfrew, ‘Alternative Models for Exchange and Spatial Distribution’, 71–90 in T. K. Earle and J. E. Ericson (eds), Exchange Systems in Prehistory (New York, 1977).
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, op. cit. in note 1, 41.
   Google Scholar
• I. Hodder, ‘Trade and Exchange: Definitions, Identification and Function’, 151–56 in R. E. Fry (ed.), op. cit. in note 43.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder and Orton, op. cit. in note 43, 126–54.
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, op. cit. in note 1, 46–48.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 48.
   Google Scholar
• I. Hodder, ‘Some Effects of Distance on Human Interaction’, 156–78 in I. Hodder (ed.), The Spatial Organisation of Culture (London, 1978), 162.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 162.
   Google Scholar
• R. Hodges, Dark Age Economics: The Origins of Towns and Trade A.D. 600–1000 (London, 1982), 35–36.
   Google Scholar
• Continental examples of ivory rings include Meckenheim, Dangolsheim, Cividale, Oerlingen, Bolach, Ingersheim, Weimar, and Walheim (Myres and Green, op. cit. in note 2, 101; Meaney, op. cit. in note 2, 250).
   Google Scholar
• Evison, op. cit. in note 30, 50.
   Google Scholar
• Harden, op. cit. in note 25.
   Google Scholar
• J. Hines, The Scandinavian Character of Anglian England in the Pre-Viking Period (Oxford, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Brit. Ser. 124, 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, op. cit. in note 36, 70.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, op. cit. in note 55, 280.
   Google Scholar
• V. I. Evison, The Fifth-Century Invasions South of the Thames (London, 1965).
   Google Scholar
• See M. G. Welch, Early Anglo-Saxon Sussex (Oxford, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Brit. Ser. 112, 1983), vol. 1, 222.
   Google Scholar
• C.J. Arnold, review of Welch, op. cit. in note 59, Landscape Hist., 5 (1983), 85–86.
   Google Scholar
• I. N. Wood, The Merovingian North Sea (Occ. Papers on Medieval Topics 1, 1983), 17.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, op. cit. in note 51, 36.
   Google Scholar
• For example, Hawkes, op. cit. in note 36, 76.
   Google Scholar
• C. J. Arnold, ‘Wealth and Social Structure: A Matter of Life and Death’, 91 in P. Rahtz, T. Dickinson and L. Watts (eds), Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries 1979 (Oxford, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Brit. Ser. 82, 1980), fig. 4.5; Hodges, op. cit. in note 51, 36.
   Google Scholar
• P. H. Sawyer, ‘Kings and Merchants’, in P. H. Sawyer and I. N. Wood (eds), Early Medieval Kingship (Univ. Leeds, 1977), 150.
   Google Scholar
• Ibid., 144.
   Google Scholar
• G. Astill, ‘Archaeology, Economics and Early Medieval Europe’, Oxford J. Archaeol., 4(2) (1985), 221.
   Google Scholar
• For example, Hawkes, op. cit. in note 36, 76.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, op. cit. in note 51, 36.
   Google Scholar
• See Astill, op. cit. in note 67, 221; Wood, op. cit. in note 61, 18.
   Google Scholar
• R. Hodges, ‘The Evolution of Gateway Communities: Their Socio-Economic Implications’, 117–23 in C. Renfrew and S. Shennan (eds), Ranking, Resource and Exchange (Cambridge, 1982).
   Google Scholar