Are conditional cooperators willing to forgo efficiency gains? Evidence from a public goods experiment

References

• Andreoni , J. and Miller , J. 2002 . Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism . Econometrica , 70 : 737 – 753 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardsley , N. and Sausgruber , R. 2005 . Conformity and reciprocity in public good provision . Journal of Economic Psychology , 26 : 664 – 681 .
   Google Scholar
• Brandts , J. and Schram , A. 2001 . Cooperation and noise in public goods experiments: Applying the contribution function approach . Journal of Public Economics , 79 : 399 – 427 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosig , J. 2002 . Identifying cooperative behavior: some experimental results in a prisoner's dilemma game . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 47 : 275 – 290 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness , G. and Rabin , M. 2002 . Understanding social preferences with simple tests . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 117 : 817 – 869 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri , A. and Paichayontvijit , T. 2006 . Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to a public good . Economics Bulletin , 3 : 1 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Croson , R. 2007 . Theories of commitment, altruism and reciprocity: evidence from linear public goods games . Economic Inquiry , 45 : 199 – 216 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelmann , D. and Strobel , M. 2004 . Inequity aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments . American Economic Review , 94 : 857 – 869 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr , E. and Schmidt , K.M. 1999 . A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 114 : 817 – 868 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher , U. 2007 . Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments . Experimental Economics , 10 : 171 – 178 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher , U. , Gächter , S. and Fehr , E. 2001 . Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment . Economics Letters , 71 : 397 – 404 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher , U. and Gächter , S. 2010 . Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public good experiments . American Economic Review , 100 ( 1 ) : 541 – 556 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher , J. , Isaac , R. M. , Schatzberg , J. and Walker , J. 1995 . Heterogeneous demand for public goods: behavior in the voluntary contributions mechanism . Public Choice , 85 : 249 – 266 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaspart , F. and Seki , E. 2003 . Cooperation, status seeking and competitive behaviour: Theory and evidence . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 51 : 51 – 77 .
   Google Scholar
• Goeree , J. , Holt , C. and Laury , S. 2002 . “ Incentives in public goods experiments: implications for the environment ” . In Recent advances in environmental economics , Edited by: List , J. and de Zeeuw , A. Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar .
   Google Scholar
• Güth , W. , Kliemt , H. and Ockenfels , A. 2003 . Fairness versus efficiency: An experimental study of (mutual) gift giving . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 50 : 456 – 475 .
   Google Scholar
• Keser , C. and van Winden , F. 2000 . Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods . Scandinavian Journal of Economics , 102 : 23 – 39 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps , D. M. , Milgrom , P. , Roberts , J. and Wilson , R. 1982 . Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma . Journal of Economic Theory , 27 : 245 – 252 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kritikos , A. and Bolle , F. 2001 . Distributional concerns: equity- or efficiency-oriented? . Economics Letter , 73 : 333 – 338 .
   Google Scholar
• Levati , M. V. and Neugebauer , T. 2004 . An application of the English clock market mechanism to public goods games . Experimental Economics , 7 : 153 – 169 .
   Google Scholar
• Liebrand , W.B.G. 1984 . The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed motive game . European Journal of Social Psychology , 14 : 239 – 264 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ockenfels , A. 1999 . Fairness, Reziprozität und Eigennutz , Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck .
   Google Scholar
• Offerman , T. , Sonnemans , J. and Schram , A. 1996 . Value orientations, expectations and voluntary contributions in public goods . Economic Journal , 106 : 817 – 845 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada , A. and Riedl , A. 2005 . Inefficiency and social exclusion in a coalition formation game: Experimental evidence . Games and Economic Behavior , 50 : 278 – 311 .
   Google Scholar
• Park , E.-S. 2000 . Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: a further experimental study of framing effects on free-riding . Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 43 : 405 – 421 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks , C.D. 1994 . The predictive ability of social values in resource dilemmas and public goods games . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 20 : 431 – 438 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staffiero , G. Helping the meaner, hurting the nicer: the contribution versus distribution game . IESE Research Papers No. 652, University of Navarra, Spain .
   Google Scholar
• Sugden , R. 1984 . Reciprocity: the supply of public goods through voluntary contributions . Economic Journal , 94 : 772 – 787 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk , E. , De Cremer , D. and Handgraaf , M. 2004 . Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 40 : 697 – 707 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar