Innovative capabilities among SMEs in Malaysian manufacturing: An analysis using firm-level data

References

• Abdullah, M.A. (2002). An overview of the macroeconomic contribution of SMEs in Malaysia. In B.C.L. Charles Harvie (Ed.), The role of SMEs in national economies in East Asia (Vol. 2, pp. 181–200). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J., Hanel, P., & Sabourin, D. (2000). Determinants of innovative activity in Canadian manufacturing firms: the role of intellectual property rights. Statistics Canada Working Paper. No. 11F0019 MPE No. 122.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R.J., & Smith, C. (2002). Competitive conditions, competitive advantage and the location of SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9, 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R.E., Porter, M.E., Spence, A.M., & Scott, J.T. (1980). Competition in the open economy: A model applied to Canada. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. (1996). Empirical studies of innovative activity. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), The handbook of the economics of technological change (pp. 182–264). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Crespi, G., & Zúñiga, P. (2010). Innovation and productivity: Evidence from six latin American countries. IDB Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-18. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved from http://www.sela.org/attach/258/default/IDB_Innovation_and_productivity_(Gustavo_Crespi-Pulvia_Zuniga).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P.C., Haskel, J.E., & Slaughter, Matthew J. (2005). Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, 28(2), 191–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P., Nicolaou, N., & Salter, A. (2009). The elixir or burden of youth? Exploring differences among start-ups and established firms in innovation behaviour in the UK (Research Report 09-11). Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. Presented at the DRUID summer conference 2007 on appropriability, proximity, routines and innovation, Copenhagen, CBS, Denmark. Retrieved from: http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/corporate/migratedD/publications/D/DIUS_RR_09_11
   Google Scholar
• De Melto, D., McMullen, K., & Wills, R. (1980). Innovation and technological change in five Canadian industries (Discussion Paper No. 176). Ottawa: Economic Council of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• East Asia and Pacific Region. (2000). National survey of innovation in industry, 1997–1999. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Ettlie, J.E., Bridges, W.P., & O’Keefe, R.D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6), 682–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettlie, J.E., & Reza, E.M. (1992). Organizational integration and process innovation. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 795–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, D., Manso, G., & Silva, A.C. (2012). Incentives to innovate and the decision to go public or private. Review of Financial Studies. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhs070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. (2004). The behaviour of the maximum likelihood estimator of limited dependent variable models in the presence of fixed effects. The Econometrics Journal, 7, 98–119.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G.H., Huamao, B., Xiaojing, G., & Xiaoyun, Y. (2006). R&D performance in Chinese industry. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4–5), 345–366.
   Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., Lawson, C., Smith, H.S., Moore, B., & Wilkinson, F. (1998). Internationalisation processes, networking and local embeddedness in technology-intensive small firms. Small Business Economics, 11(4), 327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Lee, G.C. (2007). SME innovation in the Malaysian manufacturing sector. Economics Bulletin, 12, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, R.C., & Reiss, P.C. (1988). Cost-reducing and demand-creating R&D with spillovers. Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 538–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaysian Institute of Economic Research. (2000). Retrieved from http://www.mier.org.my/
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, S., & Lai, Y.W. (2000). Technological maturity and development without research: The challenge for Malaysian manufacturing. Development and Change, 31(2), 435–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Economic Model. (2000). The new economic model for Malaysia, Part 1. Kuala Lumpur: National Economic Advisory Council.
   Google Scholar
• New Economic Model. (2010). The new economic model for Malaysia concluding Part 2. Kuala Lumpur: National Economic Advisory Council. Retrieved from http://www.pmo.gov.my/.../NEM_Concluding_Part.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. A joint publication of OECD and Eurostat, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Luxembourg: Statistical Office of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Rasiah, R. (1995, August). Institutions and innovations: Technological learning in Malaysia's electronic industry. Paper prepared for the International Symposium on Innovation Networks: East Meets West, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Rasiah, R. (2003). Foreign ownership, technology and electronics exports from Malaysia and Thailand. Journal of Asian Economics, 14(5), 785–811.
   Google Scholar
• Rasiah, R. (2011). Financing small and medium manufacturing firms in Malaysia. In C. Harvie, S. Oum, & D. Narjoko (Eds.), Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) access to finance in selected East Asian economies (pp. 231–260). Jakarta: ERIA.
   Google Scholar
• Rasiah, R., & Malakolunthu, A. (2010). Economic performance and technological intensities of electronics firms in Johor: Does size matter? International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 3, 47–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, B.M., & Sadowski-Rasters, G. (2006). On the innovativeness of foreign affiliates: Evidence from companies in the Netherlands. Research Policy, 35(3), 447–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row (1975 reprint).
   Google Scholar
• Shefer, D., & Frenkel, A. (2005). R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis. Technovation, 25(1), 25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SME Corp. (2011). SME Census 2011. Retrieved from http://www.smecorp.gov.my/v4/node/2681
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R.M. (2000). Growth theory: An exposition (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, 224 pp.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Technology transfer to Malaysia: The electronics and electrical goods sector and the supporting industries in Penang. Kuala Lumpur: Author.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2007). Malaysia small and medium enterprises building and enabling environment. Kuala Lumpur: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, J.M., & Abernathy, W.J. (1975). A dynamic model for process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2005). Malaysia firm competitiveness, investment climate and growth (Report No. 26841). Growth Poverty Reduction, Economic Management and Financial Sector Unit (PREM) East Asia and Pacific Region, Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/8310.
   Google Scholar